View Full Version : The Battle of Las Navas de Tolsa


silver 2039
Dec 06, 2004, 06:18 AM
The Battle of Las Navas de Tolsa


In the year 711 AD a Muslim people known as the Moors crossed the Straits of Gibraltar and in five years after the Battle of Guadlete had conquered much of the Iberian Peninsula. The Visigoths who formerly inhabited the area were driven north into the mountains of Asturias. The Reconquest by the Visigoths and their descendants to retake the lost territories began in 718 AD but it would be 700 years before it ended. Perhaps the most important event during the Reconquest was The Battle of Las Navas de Tolsa.

The Battle of Las Navas de Tolsa took place northeast of Cordoba and Jaen on Monday July 16, 1212 AD. The battle occurred as a result of the Crusade called for by Pope Innocent III against the so-called Muslim “infidel”. The armies of Castile led by Alfonso VIII, Navarre led by Sancho VII, Aragon led by Peter II, and Portugal led by Alfonso II united in a massive battle against the Moorish armies led by Muhammad al-Nasir. The Christian Coalition as it was called was also joined by French and Italian knights responding to the Pope’s call for Crusade. The outcome of the battle would decide the fate of Southern Iberia.

The Christian armies massed at Toledo and then set off south. Their expedition got off to a bad start with most of the foreign Crusaders deserting, unable to stand the heat and disease. Undaunted the Iberian armies continued their journey finally arriving at Las Navas de Tolsa on Friday July 13 1212 AD. On Saturday and Sunday only small skirmishes took place between the Christians and Moors. But on Monday July 16 the Christian armies launched a large-scale attack.

The Castilian forces were flanked on the right by Navarrese troops and on the left by Aragonese troops. At first the Moors were driven back but once the bulk of the Moorish army entered the battle it looked as if the Christians would be defeated. It was then the Castilians led by Alfonso VIII and together with the armies of Aragon and Navarre advanced. The combined offensive was the decisive event of the battle. The attack even managed to reach the headquarter tent where the Moorish leader was. The Moorish retreat turned into a rout and their leader Muhammad al-Nasir fled to Jaen that night.

Here is an excerpt from the account of the battle: “ Then the Christian arose after midnight, the hour at which Christ, whom they worshipped, rose up victorious over death. After hearing the solemnities of masses, and being renewed by the life-giving sacrament of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God, they fortified themselves with the sign of the cross. They quickly took up their weapons of war, and with joy rushed to the battle as if they were invited to a feast. Neither the broken and stony places, nor the hollowness of the valleys nor the steep mountains held them back. They advanced on the enemy prepared to die or to conquer”

As a result of the Battle of Las Navas de Tolsa Moorish power in southern Iberia was shattered and they would never again dominate Iberia as they once had. In the ensuing 40 years the Christians conquered much of the formerly Moorish area.

The Kingdom of Castile gained much of the area and would go on to become the dominant power in Iberia, absorbing Aragon then later the last Moorish Kingdom of Granada in 1492. Later Navarre would be conquered as well uniting all of Modern Spain.

As for the Moors with the loss of Granada they disappeared into the sands of Africa the once powerful empire, which had spanned all across North Africa and into Iberia and the Middle East gone. But their impact on the culture and history of Iberia remains, a testament to time.

Sources:
www.wikipedia.com
www.deremilitari.org
www.colleage.hmco.com

silver 2039
Dec 06, 2004, 06:19 AM
My first history article go easy.

Adler17
Dec 06, 2004, 11:21 AM
Good first article.

Adler

SeleucusNicator
Dec 06, 2004, 11:38 AM
I must say, I am surprised to see you know so much on this topic, as most of your posts are decisively India-related. Then again, this is coming from the guy who uses an ancient Macedonian name to write about 19th century American Presidents. Isn't CFC wonderful.

Good job on the article. I hope to see more.

jonatas
Dec 06, 2004, 02:44 PM
nice article... im pleasantly surprised that your interested in this subject... it's one of my favourites

i would suggest adding more detail to your articles to improve on them... but i enjoyed it :goodjob:

Lord_Sidious
Dec 08, 2004, 04:19 PM
Very well, a pefect description of one of the most important battles in Iberia. Actually you say that the portuguese king was Alfonso II but in the portuguese language is AFONSO not Alfonso!

Verbose
Dec 08, 2004, 05:38 PM
Very well, a pefect description of one of the most important battles in Iberia. Actually you say that the portuguese king was Alfonso II but in the portuguese language is AFONSO not Alfonso!
In his defense, this is an English speaking environment. English name forms are accepted. Besides the list of kings up above is linguistic mess anyway with alternate forms of Alfonso/Afonso and Peter/Pedro/Peire etc.

calgacus
Dec 08, 2004, 06:39 PM
Later Navarre would be conquered as well uniting all of Modern Spain.


"as well as"? :confused:

Jorge
Dec 09, 2004, 03:21 AM
"as well as"? :confused:

As well as Granada. But in fact Navarra was annexionated, not conquered as Granada (I mean, there was not a war to gain Navarra).

Drakan
Dec 09, 2004, 03:43 AM
Good first article Silver2039. :goodjob:

Btw, isn't it Navas de Tolosa ?

Gagliaudo
Dec 14, 2004, 05:13 AM
Nice article, indeed :goodjob:
Of course is TolOsa, as Drakan wrote... :)

expeliarmus
Jan 07, 2005, 08:30 AM
Very nice description of the battle of Las Navas de TolOsa. (with a "o" between the l and the s).
It seems like if you had been there, hehe.
Just a little thing, Navarre was not conquered, was annexionated to Spain as a result of some treaties (I dont know exactly what kind of treaties), but there was no fight.
And i would like to say: in the Crusades, a lot of european kingdoms sent troops and helped very much to conquer the muslim kingdoms of Holy Land, but in the Spanish Reconquista, the iberian kingdoms were alone against the muslim kingdom, and I think the Iberian Paeninsula being european terrain, would have to be helped to conquer by all europeans..., because what would have happened if the iberian kingdoms had lost the Reconquista?
Greetings to you all.

jonatas
Jan 07, 2005, 08:56 AM
in the Crusades, a lot of european kingdoms sent troops and helped very much to conquer the muslim kingdoms of Holy Land, but in the Spanish Reconquista, the iberian kingdoms were alone against the muslim kingdom,

well, French, Flemish, German and English forces, knights and noblemen participated at various points in the Iberian Reconquista... many stopped off on their way to the holy land, and the Popes issued papal bulls that ruled fighting in Iberia against the muslims was equal to fighting the muslims in the holy land... so there were some who helped the christian iberians... and don't forget, at this time many of the muslim rulers in iberia allied with the christians against other muslims, and some christians allied with muslims against christian rulers.... remember El Cid ?? it is a fascinating era to study, but it can get quite complicated

yaroslav
Jan 07, 2005, 10:18 AM
in fact Portugal started out from some county gived to a one/some French crusaders that helped here in Spain (I don't rembember the details, Rolo, McDrear and other of our cousins from Portugal will propably know better)

jonatas
Jan 07, 2005, 10:24 AM
in fact Portugal started out from some county gived to a one/some French crusaders that helped here in Spain (I don't rembember the details, Rolo, McDrear and other of our cousins from Portugal will propably know better)

yes, to a nobleman of Burgundy... the first royal line of portugal would descend from this line, that is why the first dynasty is sometimes called the "burgundian" dynasty

later, in 1147, french and also english, flemish and germans participated in taking Lisbon, the first bishop appointed was english... many of these crusaders settled in Portugal

the crusaders were intending to go to Palestine, but Afonso Henriques managed to convince them to fight the muslims in his "kingdom"... the english would go on to form many treaties with Portugal, in fact Portugal's alliance with England is one of the oldest in Europe

MCdread
Jan 07, 2005, 10:49 AM
in fact Portugal started out from some county gived to a one/some French crusaders that helped here in Spain (I don't rembember the details, Rolo, McDrear and other of our cousins from Portugal will propably know better)

Yes, to a member of the family of the counts of Burgundy, Henrique, while his cousin got modern day Galicia. I guess the king of León didn't want it to be possible for the galician kingdom of king Garcia to become a reality again, so he split it. This was a period with very complex religious and dynastic struggles and Henrique became the iberian ally of the Cluny Abbey. When his son Afonso's cause to inherit Castille-León wasn't possible anymore, he started to break away from his cousin, king of Castille and eventually carved his own kingdom. Many french, flemmish, german and english knights took part in the Reconquista. These crusaders had a pivotal role in the conquest if Lisbon for example, and many foreigners were given new lands to colonize. My region of birth for example is called Proença, and it is believed that the name comes from the region of origin of the people who settled it in that time: the region of Provence in southern France.

@jonatas: actually the alliance between Portugal and England is the oldest in the world still in effect. The 100 years war was also felt in the Peninsula, with Portugal defending the english cause and Castille aligned with France. In the crisis of 1383-85, english longbowmen fought in the portuguese army, including in the battle of Aljubarrota. The alliance was officialised when João I, first king of the new dinasty ad interal order that came out of 1385 married the english princess Isabel/Elizabeth of house of Lancaster. But when Portugal emerged from the terrible 2nd half of the XVI century and the Habsburg rule, the alliance was no longer between equal peers, and at some point in the coming centuries Portugal turned almost into a british protectorate.

Lord_Sidious
Jan 07, 2005, 11:08 AM
Yes, to a member of the family of the counts of Burgundy, Henrique, while his cousin got modern day Galicia. I guess the king of León didn't want it to be possible for the galician kingdom of king Garcia to become a reality again, so he split it. This was a period with very complex religious and dynastic struggles and Henrique became the iberian ally of the Cluny Abbey. When his son Afonso's cause to inherit Castille-León wasn't possible anymore, he started to break away from his cousin, king of Castille and eventually carved his own kingdom. Many french, flemmish, german and english knights took part in the Reconquista. These crusaders had a pivotal role in the conquest if Lisbon for example, and many foreigners were given new lands to colonize. My region of birth for example is called Proença, and it is believed that the name comes from the region of origin of the people who settled it in that time: the region of Provence in southern France.

@jonatas: actually the alliance between Portugal and England is the oldest in the world still in effect. The 100 years war was also felt in the Peninsula, with Portugal defending the english cause and Castille aligned with France. In the crisis of 1383-85, english longbowmen fought in the portuguese army, including in the battle of Aljubarrota. The alliance was officialised when João I, first king of the new dinasty ad interal order that came out of 1385 married the english princess Isabel/Elizabeth of house of Lancaster. But when Portugal emerged from the terrible 2nd half of the XVI century and the Habsburg rule, the alliance was no longer between equal peers, and at some point in the coming centuries Portugal turned almost into a british protectorate.

Yeah, but later the English were only our friends when they wanted, see the example of the Ultimatum and when they conquerd Hormuz from us.
But that was off-topic
The Battle of Navas de Tolosa was one of the most important battles of the Reconquista and maybe the more important

MCdread
Jan 07, 2005, 12:10 PM
Yeah, but later the English were only our friends when they wanted, see the example of the Ultimatum and when they conquerd Hormuz from us.

Isn't that always the case in international relations?