I have played a couple of OCCC's and they were all great fun. The best of them all was emperor OCCC and -despite the fact that we barely managed to win it- it made some of us curious what would happen on demigod.

I don't want to make the game too strict on this level though.

So that's why I came with the following variant:

VARIANT RULES
-Demigod OCC, with Space or Conquest as Gold medal wins, 20K culture as Silver medal win and UN as bronze medal win.
-Small map
-AI Aggression: normal
-Opponents: 5 random AI's.
-Rules: Standard, all standard single player victories enabled
-Barbarians: No barbarians/sedentary
-Level: Demigod
-C3C 1.22
-No matter what, we stay optimistic/fatalistic and try our best. I have played a lot of games against the odds and they can be the most fun.
-EDIT (feb 5, 22:30 CET): With OCC I mean: at the end of the turn we may not have more than one city. During the turn we may have as many as we want. So we are allowed to demand cities for peace and then abandon them.
-We may not build cities ourselves!
-Popped settlers have to be joined into the city. END EDIT.

BANNED TACTICS
These tactics are banned in my SG's. I got my inspiration from RBCiv, with a few slight differences:

"Phony Peace Treaty": Making Peace Treaties without having the intention to stay at peace, just to get cheap techs, cities or money.

"Mass troop jumping": When you give away a city to another tribe, all the troops from that city are transported to your capital. This can be exploited. Especialy in scenarios where you need to take an important city (for example a possible 20K city) and after that want to get your troops home safely. It is OK to give away a city with up to two defenders in it.

"RoP Rape": Using Right of Passage to move whole armies into attack position.

"Resource Piracy": Sitting on resources or deny a civ access to a tile inside the borders of the rival while at peace.

"Seed Corn": It is not allowed to buy the LAST TWO workers from the AI before 1000 BC.

"Negative cash research": The penalty of negative cash is only one unit. So there are cases where this can be worthwile. Science spending must be lowered when the cash would go below zero.

"Great Library slingshot": When you capture the Great Library city before you have Education and keep it one turn, you will get ALL the technologies known by at least two other tribes. You can get from the Middle Ages into the Modern Age with this tactic. The Great Library slingshot is not a valid tactic in my SG's. You are allowed to capture the Great Library city as one of a number of cities to weaken the owner. But it can't be a campaign to capture this city alone, hold it for a turn and then abandon it.

Others:
Things that I didn't name but are in the spirit of what I mention above I would like to have discussed.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

roster is full

24hrs to post a "got it" notice, and up to 48hrs after that to finish and post your turns. First player can do 25 turns, after that 15 turns per player, 10 turns per player in war times.

We will play a small map. Probably pangaea, but maybe archipelago when we choose to be the Vikings... After winning it on regent with the Zulu, on monarch with the Arabs and on emperor with the Germans I think that a lot of civs are good choices for demigod. I really loved the Germans and can see us playing the Ottomans as well. I think a later UU (early/mid industrial) is best, but we barely made it to panzers in the emperor game. Vikings would also be interesting. I'm also open to other choices. Let's discuss!

Barbarians: No barbarians/sedentary
I am very much glad to see that. After dealing with 5CCC games and barbs, I could never go back.

I may regret it, but I don't think a 1CC will that much time. If I find new work I may be in trouble keeping all my games going...

One major request is a COASTAL city. The bonus on colussus (sp?) is just so important. My playing in Epic 47 proved that.

So you are in Lee? Welcome. Coastal I think is a must.

I'll also jump in this one if room is still available.

So you are in Lee? Welcome.

To make it clear - YES.

To make it clear - YES.

Same crew indeed!

Mark1031: You are too late for this one :( I think that 7 is a but much for an OCC. But there's room in the sid game, so you are in that team.

NP: Good luck this should be difficult. I think I'll shadow it as it should be relatively fast to play.

Well, I'll just follow this game from time to time, then. :blush: Good luck ! :)

ARGH! Sorry that I forgot about you krys :blush: You were in fact the first to volunteer :( I'm now thinking about creating two teams... We'd have 3 already if mark is still interested...

I'd be game.

Mmmmhwell, I replied because I saw you back and wanted to play with you, using your ruleset. :) The problem is I post more in a better forum, that's my mistake. :p No biggie. If you don't play in the other team, just forget it, my motivation was a sudden one-timer thingie while at work. ;)

OK krys. I make it up to you in another way then :) And I stick with one OCC game at the moment.

OK, back on topic then. I like to vote for civs and discuss their pros and cons. You can find my 2 cents in the first post.

Industrious would be nice (due to lack of workers), and either Seafaring or Agriculture as second trait.

That makes either Carthage or Maya. Also, Netherlands would be the 3rd choice.

This is just considering the traits. I've played many times Carthage, and currently playing Maya as well, plus Aggie would like Netherlands..so either one of the 3 would be OK for me.

Industrious would be nice (due to lack of workers), and either Seafaring or Agriculture as second trait.

What would be so good about agri for an OCC? I understand seafaring, because you get more commerce in your city. I'm a big fan of the Scientific Trait and I think that the free techs will still be a big help for us on demigod.

So without looking at the UU's that would mean:
-Byzantines
-Ottomans
-Persia

Ottomans have a super UU and Persia is not too bad, but an early war may not be our thing.

I'm not thinking about a possible cultural victory at the moment. The gold medal is for conquest or space, which don't have to rule each other out regarding the way we have to play it. And UN remains a last resort in all situations.

EDIT: I added a few rules to the variant in the first post. They explain what is allowed regarding cities in this OCC. Basically it means: we are allowed to capture cities and abandon them at the end of the turn and we are also allowed to demand cities for peace as long as we abandon them -again- at the end of the turn at the latest. This will allow us to create one or two armies. I will also increase unhapiness in our city. So it's not all good.

Scientific with the free techs is a nice trait for OOC, specially if we aim for the Space ship win, it also allows us to start collossus early.

Both germans and ottomans have great UU for conquest, and the science trait will allow easier fallback to space or diplomacy victory.

Agricultural IMO dont help much in OCC except allows us to grow to size 12 faster plus allows us to put out workers slightly faster.

Industrial will give us extra shield(s) from our capital most of the game, and workers can build roads to needed colonies faster.

Commercial gives us extra gold, the corruption gain is lost, but allows us to start with curraghs and alphabeth

Seafaring also gives extra gold, faster boats and start with alphabeth.. if we play on archipelagio then seafaring is very helpful...

Mil gives us more elite units.. however we will have limited use for leaders.

Expansionist is ok if on a pangea or continents.. popping huts can give us several techs plus settlers to join into our city.. early contacts is nice too.

Germans and Ottomans are both fine with me..
Vikings or possibly Bysantines (if we go for primary space/diplomacy)

Another civ to perhaps consider might be India, since their UU require no resources and have an extra hp, or japan for 4.4.2 unit that require just iron. On the other hand both these are religious, which isnt that useful when we have short anarchy anyway due to only 1 city.

Ofcourse.. if we want to raise our odds of winning, we should take a coastal start with many river tiles and ivory :p

I suppose we are going to build the GL? Sci isn't so big IMO. But it certainly is a good trait.

Every player in this game has played in the LK series. :crazyeye:
I guess that is what happens when you run 90+ SGs.


Commercial would we weak. Its main advantage is to lower corruption for a large empire. Since we have one city we only gain little extra cash.

Expansionist is very hard to say if the landmass type is random. Unless we agree to Pangaea I would say no to this trait.

Agricultural would let us grow a little faster. However, as a 1CC I don't think a non-river start is viable. If we have a river, we lost the cheap aqueduct.

Industrious means we can probably use less workers saving GPT, and an extra shield. I wouldn't mind this trait.

Scientific is always a good trait. We need to build library and university, and 1/2 price doesn't hurt. 3 free techs really help in the tech race.

Religious would also help. Getting luxuries will be hard, so cheap temples and churches don't hurt. If we go conquest, the ability to revolt to Monarchy to avoid WW is a big plus.

Seafaring for a little gold helps. The extra movement will speed contacts depending if we one a heavy island map.

Military is hard to say. If we go UN or space this is a wasted trait.


Without knowing the map type of Continents, Pangaea or Archipelago I can't make a clear choice.


Regardless of traits Sumeria still tempts me, just so I don't have to fact them.


Both Germans and Ottomans have great UU for conquest
I agree 100% with this. My first 5CCC win was with Panzers. That extra movement point is awesome.

Don't forget France. Superior starting techs, fast Workers, and especially a surprisingly strong UU in C3C.

my vote goes to Ottoman. their UU is really powerful. have to fave them in so many games and they can be a real pain there

Welcome back Aggie :D

I will vote for the Ottomans. I would be satisfied with most choices listed so far though.

Thabks Greebley. My civ burn-out has gone and so have my reasons for not playing the game. We know that this game is flawed, but we can work around that. For example by trying to win VERY difficult games :)

Anyway, I count the following preferences:
- Ottomans 3x (Aggie, Greebley, THeRat)
- Germans/Ottomans 1x (Ghyathaar)
- Netherlands/Maya/Carthage (microbe)

LKendter is undecided, but also mentions the Ottomans. Be assured: this will be a pangaea map. I only thought about archi with the Vikings.

This means that the Ottomans are the favorites. So I will start up a game with them!

What about this start? I overestimated the time I have today. So I will only be able to play tomorrow.

EDIT: And I have cold feet. I haven't played this game for a couple of months and am in doubt how to start. I was thinking: go north with the worker (on the game tile) and then start to chop. However, chopping for what? Barracks? I think that we need a couple of warriors first to scout, then granary and maybe temple and then go for the Colossus. Regarding science I'm thinking Iron Working, to gamble that we have it before others as it isn't a starting tech. Philo run doesn't seem possible with our techs. Lit run looks to be more logical.

What about this start?
Growth will be good once the game is irrigated and some forest cleared. However, I don't see a SINGLE grassland. Initial growth will really be bad.

We start with BW and Masonry? Only thing we have available to chop then is Barracks, spearmen and warriors..
The game tile is 2 food 2 shield 1 gold from the start.. the whale tile gives 2 food and 1 shield.. so we can delay chopping for up to 30 turns, but at that time we should be build collossus.. so the shields would be wasted

We do want some scouts out early.. how about chopping either the game or the silk tile first to complete a spearman in 4 turns?

Do you really want to settle on spot? Sure, the Whale is nice, but a city there would have too many water tiles for my taste (9).
I'd send the Worker to the game first, and unless something really ugly shows up, move the Settler 1 NW. You'll loose the Whale, but gain 5 more land tiles...

If a Grassland tile shows up there, what about that sequence:
Settler 1 NW, Worker to game. Found city, Wealth for 2 turns. Chop in 3 to complete scouting Warrior. Then growth to size 2 with completing a 2nd Worker.

I will try a few other rolls then...

I'm out of time (back in 24 h), so if anyone else will try to generate us a beauty of a start... I think we can be lenient towards ourselves here. We need a killer start. Or at least a very good one...

Aggie, do you want me to generate some starts?

That's OK. I was just checking in from another place. But since it's late I will not stay up much longer...

ok, I generated some starts. they are all coastal or we start in the vincinity of it. all with the settings we wished to have.

#1
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag13a.jpg

#2
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag13b.jpg

#3
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag13c.jpg

any comments?

Hmm..none look really good.

I think all those starts are fine, but I don't think they are a lot better than my first proposal.

I have done a few rolls myself this morning and came to this one. I think it's the best one that I roled:

The start:
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-OCCdemigtry2.JPG

I move the worker to the BG-tile:
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-OCCdemigtry2workermove.JPG

And the settler on the commerce of the silks:
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-OCCdemigtry2settlermove.JPG

Two BG's, a cow, 2 silks, 2 hills, more grassland and chop options, the river, only 2 sea tiles. Big risk of being blockaded and losing our rep when trading via the sea?

Shall we vote for one of the 5 proposals or do we want to try again? I myself want to choose from one of these 5. We can't get a LOT better I think...

Yeah, your start is better.

I agree with Aggie, let's choose one of those 5. what do we expect? 2 wheats and 3 cows with 1 coastal tile?
I want to add to the discussion option #3 once settler moves to coast

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag13c2.jpg

and to add to. my choice is either Aggie's #2 or the above mentioned #3.

I would go for my start. The silks are killer luxuries with a lot of extra commerce. Wouldn't it be nice to have Colossus with this start?

ok, so who is a going to start this? you?

I like to start it. But first I like the input on the starts of the other players.

I would go for the cow and silk one

I now notice that...my 2nd example is a normal sized map :mad: I played a few turns and saw that we have 8 opponents :(

I try other maps now...

I now notice that...my 2nd example is a normal sized map :mad: I played a few turns and saw that we have 8 opponents :(

I try other maps now...
Ouch, that sucks. I know that lousy feeling. I've restarted a few LK series games due to wrong setup.

I really did like the silks. Having a couple of high revenue tiles really helps.

Well, this is my 3rd option. Forget the 2nd one :( I think that the starts of ThERat are not strong enough for this ultra difficult game...

If we take this one, what will our first move be? I'm leaning towards SE because that we we will have less sea tiles and the cows within our first 9. Despite the fact that it is a BG tile.

EDIT: I think it's also vital to be somewhat in the centre of the map, for the early contacts.

If we take this one, what will our first move be? I'm leaning towards SE because that we we will have less sea tiles and the cows within our first 9. Despite the fact that it is a BG tile.

We can get stuck in a roll the starts forever mode. I say go with this one.

It is sad to settle the BG, but fast growth is key for us to build the Colossus. We also have the advantage the we can easily use the mountains and hills with all the excess food.

Thinking about it, we can go to the hill south first and reveal a lot more of the place. We would then lose only 1 turn more if we decide to go to the BG. Maybe worth it.

The lost shield from the BG should be regained at size 7.. plus at that point we also get bonus shield from industrial trait I believe.. does that turn the city square into 3shields?

I think we should go SE. What we can see makes me feel it is unlikely to want to move, we get a river and are on the ocean. As stated we get the BG back at size 7 which we will be in short order. I see no reason to waste a worker move.

OK. I'll go to the BG. Expect a turnlog within the hour.

This is a small pangaea map with sedentary barbs. The rest is random.

The worker goes to the cattle and the settler goes SE. It reveals a whale 2 tiles south! It will be wasted, because I will not move to another position anymore, risking even more turns.

Turn 1 (3950 BC) Istanbul founded and we see a 2nd silk. Starting with a warrior. I set science to min Iron Working, in the hope that we are the only one with Bronze Working...

Turn 2 - 5 (3900 - 3750 BC) :sleep:

IT: warrior->warrior

Turn 6 (3700 BC) Warrior goes NW on the hill.

Turn 7 (3650 BC) Istanbul to size 2, lux to 10%. We have wines close by.

Turn 8 (3600 BC) :sleep:

IT: warrior->warrior.

Turn 9 (3550 BC) 2nd warrior goes east.

Turn 10 (3500 BC) :sleep:

Turn 11 (3450 BC) We meet the Hittites and Persians. Both have Alphabet and Pottery. Persia also has Ceremonial Burial. No trade possible. Istanbul to size 3. Lux tax to 20%.

IT: Warrior->Colossus.

Turn 12 (3400 BC) We meet the Inca. They have the same techs as Persia last turn. Persia now also has Warrior Code. We give the Inca 4 gpt and 15 gold for Ceremonial Burial. The Hittites give us Pottery for CB and 10 gold.

Warrior stays home. Lux back to 10%. Production switched to granary.

Turn 13 (3350 BC) Inca have WC too now. We can't afford it though.

Turn 14 (3300 BC) The Hittites now also have WC. All three are up WC and Alpha.

Turn 15 (3250 BC) Size 4 Istanbul needs 20% lux tax.

Turn 16 (3200 BC) We meet Sumeria, who lack Masonry and CB, but have WC :) Masonry gives us Warrior Code and 35 gold.

Turn 17 (3150 BC) :sleep:

IT: 5 Hittite warriors enter our lands!!!

Turn 18 (3100 BC) This is looking bad...

IT: Yup, they are next to our gates!!

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-Hittietresspass.JPG

Turn 19 (3050 BC) FWIW, size 5 Istanbul needs 30% tax...

IT: The Hittites turn around!!!

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-Hittitesleave.JPG

Sumeria asks us to leave their borders. Persia starts the Pyramids.

Turn 20 (3000 BC) So we are still alive!

IT: The Hittites leave permantly(?) A Persian spear and warrior are coming towards us now. Granary->Colossus. The most powerful nations are:

-Persians
-Dutch
-Inca
-Hittites
-Sumerians
-Ottomans

Turn 21 (2950 BC) :sleep:

IT: The Hittites come back!!!!

Turn 22 (2900 BC) :sleep:

IT: The Hittites appear to follow the Persians...

Turn 23 (2850 BC) Size 6 Istanbul needs 40% tax. The Inca know The Wheel.

IT: OK, the Hittites leave us AGAIN.

Turn 24 (2800 BC) All but Sumeria knows The Wheel. Persia and Inca know Iron Working.

Turn 25 (2750 BC) Istanbul is size 7 now. 15 turns for Colossus, but we COULD still switch to temple without losing shields (11 spt now, we need another 20 for temple). I daren't take that risk though. Colossus is vital imho. I haven't hooked up the silks in my 25. I think we shouldn't wait too long for this. We need to lower tax and get back into the tech dealing business.

To the west of us both Hittites and Persians have a SoD walking around.

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2500BC.jpg

2750 BC save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2750BC.zip)

EDIT: changed the last link to point to the actual save!

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie ----- just played
microbe -- up
ThERat --- on deck
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

The "2750 Save" is a link to a picture. Can we have a link to the save.

:crazyeye: This crazy Hittie 'SoD' made this beginning one of the more entertaining SG starts I've read so far... :lol:

After winning an OCC emperor space race on a standard map in Epic 46, I'm curious to see how a DG OCC on a small map will play out. Good luck!

-Kylearan

LKendter, he has the wrong extension. The Real Save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2750BC.zip). Good luck with this game. Colossus + Silks (2!) = Gold. Very powerful.

@LKendter: changed it!

EDIT: Lee, you now have 3 links to choose from :lol:

@Kyrealan: note that I returned to CIV because of the lack of intelligence of the AI in the other games I played in the last months :lol: I am curious about the outcome myself. Especially considering the fact that my emperor OCCC SG (AG10) already appeared to be asking the best of the team. But I started this one to find out. The most fun SG's are those which seem impossible but somehow challenge you and possibly even turn out to be winnable :)

looks like the save is at: http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2750BC.zip

Edit: Crossposted with Aggie so nm :)

@Kyrealan: note that I returned to CIV because of the lack of intelligence of the AI in the other games I played in the last months :lol: I am curious about the outcome myself. Especially considering the fact that my emperor OCCC SG (AG10) already appeared to be asking the best of the team. But I started this one to find out. The most fun SG's are those which seem impossible but somehow challenge you and possibly even turn out to be winnable :)
Btw.. I assume you know about the barbarian fix Aggie? Could be the random hittite troop movements is from AIPatroling if you have that turned on

Yes, even if sedentary there COULD be barbarians in this game. True. They may have popped a hut.

The barbarian fix also makes units move around randomly if they have no other tasks, not just barbarians

:lol: Those Hitties just wanted to say Hello.

I got it, will play today.

It's sad to see we could only use 2 of the 4 cattles.

Hittite Leader: King Aggie has just come back from a long hiatus so lets give a royal welcome. Take 5 bands of warriors and charge purposefully toward his only city, run around three times and come back. It should scare the pants off him and give us a good laugh.

Hittite General: Oh that sounds fun. Lets go men.

--------------

Looks good so far. I would stay on track with the Colossus.

preturn: We are running 40% lux. We should have built another MP before starting colossus..

2710BC: We meet Netherlands and trade Masonry+3g for Alphabet.

Now what? Do I abandon our min research on Iron Working and start on Writing? It's a tough call.

I raise sci to 20 to get Iron Working in 26 turns.

2670BC: Sumeria has monopoly on Mysticism! And it agrees to trade with Alphabet!

I dial up Inca to see what he offers for Mysticism. Iron Working? Plus Wheel probably? I add 38g and get both techs. Then sell Mysticism to Persia for 99g.

So we are tech leader? Great.

Min on Writing as that's what we could afford.

I lower food and work on the forests to get Colossus in 10 turns instead of 13, and 3fpt instead of 5. By working on the silks I can lower lux to 30.

We have two sources of horses close to us, one just outside of our border. We have iron close too, but AI will settle on it.

2550BC: I pillage roads which connects 3 Dutch cities just to screw it up a bit. :evil:

2510BC: We connect silks. Huh? Just? But we cannot lower lux.

2470BC: Pillage another Dutch road. It's capital is disconnected. :D

2430BC: Netherlands has Writing but lacks a bunch of techs. Monopoly techs are expensive, but I get it by Iron Working, CB, Wheel and 91g. I then sell Mysticism back and get 104g.

Since I have the gold, I set to Philosophy in 15 turns with a bit deficit.

An Inca conscript warrior enters our territory..

I establish embassy with Inca, size-1, 3spt building Colossus in 47 turns. It's got ivory. Inca knows everyone except Netherlands. Phew, otherwise we'd not be able to buy Writing so easily.

2390BC: Netherlands and Persia has got HBR and no trade possible.

I establish embassy with Hitties, size-1, 3spt building Pyramids in 93 turns. It has furs.

We have 123g with -1gpt so I do not establish more, as I don't go below 100g and let AI demand all gold away causing us to lose buildings or workers.

2310BC: We build Colossus. I start rax. We need two vet spearmen to defend ourselves.

2230BC: Netherlands and Persia are at war!

Persia has no iron, that's good. It's cute to see a bunch of regular warriors and spearmen fighting each other.

Note: Philosophy in 5 turns. We could take CoL then start on Lit at a slow path. We should trade for HBR otherwise AI will demand it anyway.

After the spear we should be able to lower lux to 20. We should start MoM with max shield and should be able to build in about 13 turns. Then go full speed on Great Library by Pyramids.

We build Colossus.
We get the key wonder. When playing a limited number of city game a revenue boast is a major plus.

Netherlands/Persia battlefield:
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2230BC.jpg

Horses and iron. Somehow I suspect the Hittie town has to go. However, it's there better than Sumeria.
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-2150BC.jpg

Wow! A very encouraging start for an OCC. Colossus and close to Philo :) I agree with CoL and min science Lit. We don't want to lose TGL with a tech demand from one of the AI. We need to be at least quite far with a pre-build for that to be allowed to happen. I also agree with MoM and then TGL.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
microbe -- just played
ThERat --- up
Gyathaar -- on deck
Greebley
LKendter

great going so far, I got it and will play tonight

so the plan is to:

- build 2 spears, MoM and GLib?
- as for research. if the philo gamble pays, go for CoL? I would prefer to get the tech that's most expensive to research at that moment, whichever tech that is.

The free tech should be one that is quite far for most or all of the AI to research. This is often CoL. IIRC other techs are more populair. OTOH one demand and we lose our monopoly. I personally think it's more important NOT to choose Lit (but go for it min science) than anything else.

EDIT: I agree with the rest of the plan.

- as for research. if the philo gamble pays, go for CoL? I would prefer to get the tech that's most expensive to research at that moment, whichever tech that is.

It's Map Making, which AI is almost guaranteed to research first after Writing. I normally choose CoL as it's one step closer to Republic.

I agree with Aggie that which tech isn't important. The key is to time GL right (meaning research Lit in about 30 turns). If AI doesn't come up with techs fast, Philosophy or CoL will get demanded away.

Pre-turn
see that we can assign one tile differently making a beaker more for science :lol:
press enter

IT Dutch ask us to leave

1. 2210BC
philo now in 3

IT Sumer throw us out

2. 2070BC
2nd MP allows us to drop lux to 20%

3. 2030BC nada

IT Hittites demand writing, have to cave :(
Sumer asks us to leave, Persia demands 24g :mad:
we get philo and CoL as planned. start MoM, go for min run on literature

4. 2010BC
MM for max shield, get MoM in 12
trade CoL to Persia for 71g and HBR (want to give us headstart for MoM, don't trade philo yet)
calculate: MOM in 12 and pyramids in 24, so lit should be around 35, set science to 30% for 36 turns

we are up money and techs, hope it won't get all demanded away

5. 1950BC nth much

6. 1910BC
our borders expanded and city grows to 10
MoM in 9, we make 19spt (around 20 turns for GLib)

IT Incan demand HBR, cave :mad:

7. 1870BC
what's up with the AI, no new techs at all now for 7 turns
increase science to 40%, lit in 24

8. 1830BC nth

IT Dutch start Oracle

9. 1790BC
Persia knows MM, but refuses to trade with philo (also monopoly)

10. 1750BC
our warrior successfully blocks Hittite settler pair to enter, there is a choke in the west

11. 1725BC nth

12. 1700BC MM has been traded
try to keep our monopoly for now and trade CoL + 60g to Dutch for MM

IT Inca start to build pyramids, hope they need longer

13. 1675BClower science so we get lit in 22
realise we didn't establish embassies, do that with Sumer, their pyramids in 43 :lol:

14. 1650BC
Persia learned philo, no more monopoly

IT we get MoM

15. 1625BC
we make currently 20spt, but will grow in 1, pyramids in 20
lower lux to 10%, increase science to 40%, so we get lit in 16

I tried to get back our northern warrior, but he kept on getting booted back north.
the western warrior blocks the choke, we can send 3rd warrior to explore western part

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag131625.jpg

I haven't loaded the save, but I assume AI haven't completed any wonders. It would be good if someone gets Polytheism, so we have a safe fallback to ToA, otherwise, AI might cascade to pyramids before we do (at hindsight, we should probably have gotten Poly as free tech). If we haven't established all embassies, do for the remaining. I did two in my turns and AIs were like 47 turns from Oracle. Check how big those capitals are to see how much faster they might have got. We may just investigate those if not sure.

GL is very important. After GL we can connect horses, start a horse rush and start conquering the world? Raze the two Hittie towns, connect iron, and also build some swords.. Use wars to slow AI down.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
microbe
ThERat --- just played
Gyathaar -- up
Greebley --- on deck
LKendter

Looks great! Very clever to adjust the time to get Lit to the Pyramid prebuild :)

Got it.. seems like i am suddenly up in all my SGs, but will take this one first I think since it will be quickest

BTW, among all the wonder cities, only Cuzco (Inca) is coastal, this means others won't be able to cascade to it. By looking at the map, Cuzco has 8spt. It's probably close to completing Oracle, and I certainly hope so. If it switches to Great Lighthouse we may want to investigate at some point to decide how fast Lit should come.

1625BC, turn 0:
We still lack embassies with persia and netherlands, so I establish embassies:

Well.. I can immediately see that our pyramid prebuild will expire.. persepolis is size 6, making 10 shields per turn and is 2 turns away from completing pyramids.

Amsterdam is size 3, making 5 shields per turn and building oracle.. 37 turns to go.

I switch Istanbul to Great lighthouse (due in 15 turns) and raise Sci to 50% so literature will be done in 13 turns.

IBT:
Persia kicks our unit out of their territory

1600BC, turn 1:
put new citizen from growth on hill that is currently getting mined.
Have to raise lux to 20%

IBT:
Persia start Oracle
Persia complete pyramids
Summeria start ToA (good timing on researching that for us!)
Hittites start Oracle
Dutch start Oracle
Dutch start Great Lighthouse

1575BC, turn 2:
Summeria has monopoly on Polytheism. IW and Writing is doubtful to getting Poly.. Summeria also knows incas, so they are sure to trade poly for writing and IW to them..
So I sell them writing for all their gold (23gold)
Give Summeria MM,IW and CoL for polytheism (they are now even in techs with incas so they will have nothing to trade for poly)

Switch great lighthouse build to ToA and lower sci to 40% again

IBT:
nada

1550BC, turn 3:
Both netherlands and Persia has philosophy now

IBT:
Persia kicks out exploring warrior again

1525BC, turn 4:
nothing

IBT:
nothing

1500BC, turn 5:
nothing

IBT:
nothing

1475BC, turn 6:
worker finish mine.. start road

IBT:
persia kicks out exploring warrior yet again.. might as well wait till the unclaimed square between persia and dutch are filled before trying to move again

1450BC, turn 7:
nothing

IBT:
Incas start great lighthouse
Incas complete oracle
Dutch start great lighthouse

1425BC, turn 8:
incas picked up philosophy

IBT:
nothing

1400BC, turn 9:
Hittites picked up MM.

IBT:
nothing

1375BC, turn 10:
Worker goes north to hill
spot horses in hittite territory right past the choke

IBT:
nothing

1350BC, turn 11:
worker starts mine
The nearby hittitie town at the wines gets culture expansion and claims the iron

IBT:
hittities kick out exploring warrior

1325BC, turn 12:
nothing

IBT:
nothing

1300BC, turn 13:
looks like incas learned philosophy and traded it to Sumeria for polytheism
I lower sci to 20%, literature in 2 turns

IBT:
nothing

1275BC, turn 14:
nothing

IBT:
nothing

1250BC, turn 15:
Literature comes in. I switch the prebuild to GLib, due in 4 turns.

Dutch has a worker for sale.. not sure if we are allowed to buy it?
I set to research on 10% on republic.. this can be switched or turned off

Collossus has just started giving Tourism bonus :)

The save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13_1250BC.SAV)

Dutch has a worker for sale.. not sure if we are allowed to buy it?
They have been at war and may lack workers. Let's just not buy before 1000BC...

I have played demigod games being backward at this stage. Yet we are tech leaders and almost have TGL!

I guess we want to build temple, harbor, library and marketplace soon. Library may not be needed, but adds to the culture.

I like microbe's idea of razing a couple of cities in the not to far future :)

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar -- just played
Greebley --- up
LKendter --- on deck

I assume we will want republic btw?

Republic will be the best government for us. We won't be in constant wars :) But more than min science is wasting money. So: good call on min science :D

1250BC, turn 15:
Literature comes in. I switch the prebuild to GLib, due in 4 turns.


To be safest it'd be nice to get Lit and complete GL at the same turn, since we have ToA as prebuild.

What's our next target? I really like taking out Sumeria, since it's big and its territory can't be easily claimed by others. But they have good UU and we need swordmen, which means we may need to take out the Hittie town first. Or we can create a colony and use the iron before the town gets a temple. We also want to dogpile Sumeria probably.

To be safest it'd be nice to get Lit and complete GL at the same turn, since we have ToA as prebuild.
Yes, I would normally do that.. but in this case it should be safe. Only one civ was building ToA, then rest are building 300 shield wonders

great going so far. a horse rush to take them on, we are lucky with that choke I think can easily set up a defense there. razing some towns would give us hopefully some slaves as well. 1 worker is a little pathetic

Got it.

Preturn: Polytheism is known. I trade it for 128 gold from Persia. I would trade for the worker myself. I don't think it would hurt the AI and it we could use it for a Horse colony, but thats just my opinion. I respect the previous post and don't buy it. We can certainly live without it.

Early:
We get the GLib -> Library -> Spear

Build the Spear to block settlers from getting too close. I want them a bit farther away from the capitol

Mid:
Gilgamesh demands Literature. We give in.
Decide to give the rest of the AI Lit as well. That way he won't gain gold from the steal and they have nothing worth trading. The AI all go to Gracious.

Temple->Worker->Harbor

End:
Trade for a worker since it is after 1000BC and build a Horse Colony.

Horse->Horse->?

Trade our Silks to Inca for Ivory and 72 gold.
Get Math from the GLib.

Notes:
Hmm. I just noticed I miscalculated. I was supposed to stop in 875 not 825. Oops. Next player could take 18 to even things out.

We can disband our 2 warriors soon. I just want to see where we pop to up north now the city has expanded.

We can build units (costing us more gold), Wealth (for more money we can't yet spend), or Temple of Artimis.
We are at +16 gold so we have some gold for units. Problem is the only one I would want to beat up is Sumeria and a stack of horsemen doesn't seem sufficient. Since we can't claim land we don't want to beat up the Hittites in my book as we want the AI as balanced as possible in strength.

I wouldn't mind allying everyone vs the Sumerians and taking a stack of Horse and cats spear to damage them in any way we can. I would feel better if we damaged them early. Ideal timing would be right after we can build a market for more gold for the allying part. Sumeria could easily become a single dominant AI and we all know where that would leave us. :suicide:

With the GLib, we can continue to pump units till it expires, with occasional building of market or happiness buildings.

With the GLib, we can continue to pump units till it expires, with occasional building of market or happiness buildings.
We need to decide HOW we want to win. We make 21 culture in 825BC. We are in excellent shape to go for 20K.

I would take 20K culture as Silver medal win. Demigod and 20K is a challenge with a empire, yet alone one lousy city.

I tried to build the Temple and Library quickly with 20K in mind. I think we want to keep it open and build Culture Buildings as soon as we get the tech. Not sure if we can get the Temple of Artimis. We could try - we may be able to switch to something else. My only worry is Sumeria. Will we have to interfere to keep them from winning?

I would certainly try conquest, and it appears to be quite doable. Culture is not exciting.

I like us to go for conquest or space. The culture option is there when we find out that the other wins are not possible at all. In fact, I rather win UN while we tried conquest or space than culture without trying. We still have to get our UU, extremely powerful for a long period.

I like the idea of allying against the Sumerians (when we are ready!). They are not our closest neighbours, so we are not in direct danger in case of a war.

Next turn we will get Republic. So we need to revolt.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie ------ on deck
microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley --- just played
LKendter --- up

So, to make my position clear: I rather see us building troops now than the ToA. Naturally we should build the marketplace and other useful improvements when we can.

The only reason for me to add culture and UN as possible wins is the fact that our emperor game was so close. It was especially difficult to keep ourselves into the tech race at the end of the industrial age. However, without wanting to underestimate the fact that things will get tougher later on we are looking at a very healthy situation right now. We are tech frontrunners and we get our free tech very soon. We should be able to reach our Sipahi while still ahead our close to the tech leaders. A well-timed GA may make it possible to advance into the Industrial Age ahead. And this may lead to us getting ToE. But now I'm planning a bit ahead I think :) We naturally also have interest in the Knight's Templar and Shakespeare. That said, Shakespeare would need us to deviate from the required techs to advance. Something we possibly can't afford.

Imho our first big decision is whether or not we try to grab Copernicus and/or Newton. These are only a bit useful for conquest but very useful for Space. That said, getting Copernicus on demigod -the wonder that probably will end up in a cascade- is very difficult anyway.

I like the idea of allying against the Sumerians (when we are ready!). They are not our closest neighbours, so we are not in direct danger in case of a war. agree with this plan. I don't really like us to build horses since we waste a lot of shields. but with this set up we have no chance unless we want to create an archer rush.

[edit] didn't see your latest post, Aggie. yes, your long term plan sounds great. if it goes all that well, that is. Shakespeare is truly a great wonder for our situation, but we would need to broker techs to get there, I don't think we would want to research those techs ourselves.

I don't really like us to build horses since we waste a lot of shields. but with this set up we have no chance unless we want to create an archer rush.

I do understand that we can produce more than 15 spt. So that would mean that building horses is wasting these shields. How do we counter this? Can we emphasize a few tiles on gold (coastal squares) and get more income instead of shields above 15 spt? I say this without access to the save...

EDIT: I don't like archers. Besides them being slow we really want horses to upgrade to knights and then sipahi.

I say this without access to the save...
ok, for you: currently we have this situation:

max shield will be 24 spt at 33 gpt (once we grow to 12 next turn and if we would mine that hill)
working ocean doesn't help since that river gives us the commerce bonus already
so we are wasting 18 shields for every horse built and I don't think there is much we can do about it

edit: for knights this will be ideal at 70s with 24spt. we need 3 turns wasting only 2s.
for sipahi at 100s we can mine a cow and have 25spt, perfect actually
once we hit 12 pop, we should not forget to do that to get to 25spt

Thanks! What happens when we turn into a republic (within now and 5 turns this will be the case, two civs have the tech already)?

What happens when we turn into a republic oh man, I do all the calculations forgetting that we are in despotism :gripe:

ok based on republic we get this scenario:

29spt (if both cows are mined)
16spt, if we maximise commerce. (work those ocean and river tiles only)

that's a nice thing to play with depending on what we want to build

ok based on republic we get this scenario:

29spt (if both cows are mined)
16spt, if we maximise commerce. (work those ocean and river tiles only)

that's a nice thing to play with depending on what we want to build

These are all good analysis, but strategic decisions need to be made regardless of the micromanagement, so it really doesn't matter. If we go to war, we have to build horsemen or swordsmen.

Umm.. in republic:
city square (industrious on BG) : 3s 2f
4x mined BG: 8s 8f
3x mined hills: 9s 3f
2x mined cow: 4s 8f
3x forest: 6s 3f

this should give 30shields at 0 extra food at size 12 if I am not wrong (?)

I don't know who is right but I sure hope Gyathaar is :D (30 spt, no growth) Anyway, we are able to build horses with our own resource and that is a luxury in an OCC. We shouldn't waste this opportunity imvho...

city square (industrious on BG) : 3s 2f Gyathaar, sounds all good BUT for the city square, that gives only 2s 2f. small difference, big effect. anyway when we build horses, we simply maximise commerce and generate 17s.
but, if we really revolt next turn, lets build a unit that finished in 1 turn before we revolt. a spear?

If i am correct we should irrigate some normal grass tiles so we can have some extra growth and fill up the food bin when we dont need 30spt (so we can pop some workers if needed)

Gyathaar, sounds all good BUT for the city square, that gives only 2s 2f.
It only gives 2 shields in despotism because of the despotism penalty I think

Imho our first big decision is whether or not we try to grab Copernicus and/or Newton. These are only a bit useful for conquest but very useful for Space. That said, getting Copernicus on demigod -the wonder that probably will end up in a cascade- is very difficult anyway.
Regardless of how we want to win keeping up in tech is very difficult. This would really help with the tech pace. Without it we lock out the possibility of space IMO and if we don't snag some MA wonders we lock out the possibility of 20K. I think not going for it locks us to ONLY conquest. We will have to decide by then if we think our position is that strong for conquest.

I think you guys should determine and state clearly whether you're playing strict or relaxed OCC rules. As I recall, Aggie plays relaxed OCC and LKendter plays strict. It makes a fair bit of difference.....

Arathorn

The city square will have 2s out of despotism.

I think you guys should determine and state clearly whether you're playing strict or relaxed OCC rules. As I recall, Aggie plays relaxed OCC and LKendter plays strict. It makes a fair bit of difference.....

Arathorn

I stated this clearly in my variant rules (1st post). I play relaxed OCC...

I stated this clearly in my variant rules (1st post). I play relaxed OCC...
Oh... good thing you pointed that out since I always play strict too, and didnt even consider it was relaxed :p

I didn't want to sound harsh with my last remark by the way. I didn't have time but still wanted to answer Arathorn's question...

I actually didnt know to be honest.. so it was a good thing you point it out :p I looked back at first post and I see you added it after I last read that post :)
It makes a big difference since relaxed OCC allows armies, and thus HE, MA and possibly Pentagon :)

LKendter, do you know that you are up?

EDIT: 24 hrs are up and it is very tempting to skip LKendter, just because I can :D But that's not what what this time restriction is about and I'm sure that Lee will finish within now and 48 hours. He's probably sleeping at the moment, so can't possibly have seen my reminder.

LKendter, do you know that you are up? of all people its him... :lol:

btw something with the signature font seems wrong, size 1 becomes huge

LKendter, do you know that you are up?

EDIT: 24 hrs are up and it is very tempting to skip LKendter, just because I can :D But that's not what what this time restriction is about and I'm sure that Lee will finish within now and 48 hours. He's probably sleeping at the moment, so can't possibly have seen my reminder.


Somehow I totally lost that fact. Somewhere in all the talk I missed who was next. Got it...

Yes, I was asleep at 12:51 AM EST.

825 BC
I don't think there is a debate on Artemis vs. horses. With 4 civs already on Artemis we won't get it. To bad, as that would have all but locked a 20K win as a backup.

Turn 87 is a very odd place to be. I will play to 100 to get it back even.
(IT) The Great Library gives us Republic.


800 BC
I revolt and draw 4 turns despite one city.
(IT) This isn't the news I wanted. Sumeria declares on the Hittites.
The Great Library gives us Monarchy. I tell the domestic advisor that we are happy with Anarchy. :crazyeye:


775 BC
(IT) Sumeria captures Harran.


730 BC
I disband the trapped exploring warrior by Persia. It will keep being booted to the same useless spot.
I open up the choke point near the horses. I need the Hittites to get units to the front ASAP before Sumeria is a monster.


670 BC
(IT) The Sumerian monster completes Artemis.
The Inca complete Hanging Gardens.


650 BC
(IT) The Great Library gives us Currency.


630 BC
Simply trying to build up enough horsemen to intervene against Sumeria.
(IT) The Hittites have their GA.
:wallbash: I open of the choke to save the Hittites, and they repay us by building a city their. :wallbash:


610 BC
I don't feel that I have a choice. I declare war on Sumeria. I give the Netherlands Monarchy and $125 to join the party. The 2 other civs are just too expensive.
(IT) Well this was totally unexpected. Persia declares war on the Dutch.


590 BC
(IT) The Great Library is running on overdrive and gives us Feudalism.


570 BC
(IT) Persia completes Statue of Zeus.


550 BC
I get an elite horse killing an EW.


==========================

Summary:
Trying to get enough horses to go on the offensive.


ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (currently playing)
Microbe (on deck)
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-550BC.zip

Got it.

War vs Sumeria should be fun! We have to raze the new Hittite town Adana at one point. It will steal our horses.

Screenie for the lurkers:

We can sell Engineering to Persia for 25 gpt and 947 gold. I will do so. The Hittites and Inca have luxes for trade. This is cheap, but will bring us nothing (lux can't go from 10% to 0%).

We are not far from obtaining Chivalry. I don't know if a Knight's Templar is an option. We probably just as well can go for horses and then upgrade. The money we have already combined with what Persia gives should be good for this. Only thing...we lack iron and need to raze Harran for that.

EDIT: I will probably play tomorrow.

now this will get interesting. I still think we should go for knights templar. by the way, since we are now in republic, do we make 29spt or the magic 30spt?

As of my turns it was still less then 30 shields. I was still trying to figure out someway for 30 sheilds.

I was still trying to figure out someway for 30 shields rails would be the answer, but that will take some time :lol:

edit: hey what about mining that mountain, would that help?

Yes, sadly I was wrong.. seems the industrious bonus dont stack with the ragained shield from settling on BG or something.. anyone know of any research done on what exactly you gain from tiles you settle on?
(In my current game I see that a size 1 town that was built on a iron hill gives 3 shields to a non industrious civ..)

I see 2 possible ways to get 30 shields (before rails and size 13).. if an iron resource magically moves, or there is a bonus grass under one of the forests.. then can work the mountain instead of a forest

bonus grass under one of the forests
Well I know the silks forest won't have any bonus grasslands...

Yeah, forests with lux wont have BG in a random game (can be edited to have it).. so that leaves just one possible forest :)

The industrious shield doesn't come until size 13. I've only looked into settling on grassland and BG.

The industrious shield doesn't come until size 13. I've only looked into settling on grassland and BG.
Hmm.. guess the civliopedia is wrong then.. it says: "... and the center city square of all cities produces extra shields in cities and metros"

We can also grow for a bit then starve for a bit. If we grow at say 5 a turn, making 15+ shields for two turns, and then starve for 10 turns at 30 shields, we can make 11 Horsemen in 12 turns. It requires a lot of workers to switch quickly, so it probably wouldn't be that good fo course.

Since the CFC search feature is still disabled (making CFC a so-so site), I can give you a link where I posted the ultimate reference for city tiles, at least to my knowledge. ;) Here here here. (http://www.civ3duelzone.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2080) To be read like a processing code.

Since the CFC search feature is still disabled (making CFC a so-so site), I can give you a link where I posted the ultimate reference for city tiles, at least to my knowledge. ;) Here here here. (http://www.civ3duelzone.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2080) To be read like a processing code.
Thanks :)
That explains a lot

Krys, thanks for the info. I think you are a great guy, but I really don't care what you think of CFC. Even or especially when you tell us every other post ;)

The Turnlog:

IHT: We are making 27 spt. I switch a couple of laborers to work on sea tiles and get us more income. We now earn 3 gpt more (34 gpt).

We sell Engineering to Persia for 25 gpt and 947 gold.

IT: Horse->horse

Turn 1 (530 BC) The Persians get Monotheism.

IT: Sumeria starts Sun Tzu. Hittites start Great Wall.

Turn 2 (510 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Horse->horse

Turn 3 (490 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Hittites lose 3 warriors vs Sumeria.

Turn 4 (470 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Now the Hittites lose two spears. But their archer and spear win battles as well. Horse->horse.

Turn 5 (450 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Sumeria and Hittites keep fighting. I see a brave Hittite warrior kill a Sumerian sword!

Turn 6 (430 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Sumeria is winning the battle vs the Hittites.

Turn 7 (410 BC) Persia now also has Invention. 5/5 horse vs 1/4 sword: 1-1, horse wins. [1-0]

IT: Persia finishes Sun Tsu.

Turn 8 (390 BC) Zzzzz

IT: 3 MDI and 2 swords are at our borders. One Enkidu nears our city. Horse->Treb

Turn 9 (370 BC)

4/5 horse vs 3/3 Enkidu: 1-3, Horse retreats
4/4 horse vs 2/3 Enkidu: 2-0, Horse wins. [2-0]

IT: Sumeria asks straight peace, but we have a MA with the Dutch. They decide to split the troops. Part of it goes to us, part of it goes to the Hittites. We have to face 2 MDI and 1 sword.

Turn 10 (350 BC) Zzzzz

IT: Hittites and Persia sign an alliance vs the Dutch! Persia starts Knights Templar!! Treb->treb.

Turn 11 (330 BC) Treb takes a HP from a reg MDI.

4/4 horse vs 3/3 sword on hill: 1-3, horse retreats.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 MDI on hill: 1-3, horse retreats.
4/4 horse vs 2/3 MDI on hill: 2-1, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 2/3 MDI on hill: 2-2, horse wins and promotes.
4/4 horse vs 2/3 MDI on hill: 2-1, horse wins. This was a good day [party] [5-0]

IT: Hittites lose Tyrana to Sumeria.

Turn 12 (310 BC) Persia is very rich. But we have twice as much.

IT: 3 swords, and Enkidu and a MDI enter our lands. Treb->treb.

Turn 13 (290 BC) Sumeria now also has Monotheism.

IT: Sumeria joins another MDI in the SOD, which now climbs a hill NW of our capital. Persia demands silks. I accept. Silks would only give us 70 gold anyway... We get Mono from TGL.

Turn 14 (270 BC) Persia is the only civ with Invention and Chivalry.

2 trebs take a HP from vet swords.
5/5 horse vs 4/4 sword on hill: 4-2, horse wins.
5/5 horse vs 4/4 Enkidu on hill: 4-1, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 sword on hill: 3-0, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/4 sword on hill: 0-4, sword wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/4 sword on hill: 3-3, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 MDI on hill: 3-2, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 MDI on hill: 0-3, sword retreats.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 sword on hill: 3-3, horse wins. [11-1]

Another lucky break. Only one loss! I expected more retreats and losses, but overall a good outcome. We have 3 horses still ready for action. But they have no target.

IT: Sumeria finishes the Great Wall :mad: Treb->horse.

Turn 15 (250 BC)

3 trebs try to hit a MDO on a mountain. Only one manages to take a HP.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 Enkidu: 1-4, Enkidu wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 Enkidu: 2-2, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 MDI: 3-3, horse wins.
4/4 horse vs 3/3 MDI: 3-0, horse wins. [14-2]

The Sumerians have the Great Wall. That is a big drawback indeed :( It appears that they won't be running away with the game that easily though. We also have the Persians. The Dutch are doing 2CC, to compete with us. They will probably be dead soon.

I would have liked us thinking about attacking Sumeria soon, but tbh now they have walls I guess we have to wait for Sipahi. Unless we can can get ourselves iron. We have a lot of money: 2463 gold.

I also think that we can forget 20K... We are not able to keep up with Persia and Sumeria in the wonder-race it seems. Especially when we also want to weaken them militarily. That said: our city has twice the culture of nr 2.

250 BC save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-250BC.zip)

I played 15 turns while at war, but they were not very difficult. Those 10 turns are more meant for Industrial wars.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (just played)
Microbe (up)
ThERat (on deck)
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

Despite our help Sumeria is still hurting the Hittites. :eek:
What would have happenned if we totally ignored them?

A daring move may be needed. A MA with Persia vs Sumeria. Persia almost finished the campaign vs the Dutch, so their troops need other diversions.

Most important thought behind it is that the Persians and Sumerians will not be able to trade this way and also hopely will get into some sort of stalemate, resulting in a slower growth of both tribes. The Persians have knights, able to beat the Sumerians spears behind walls (no, they have Immortals and lack horses!!).

I think that we can handle the Sumerian invasion... As long as we pay gpt it should be ok. Gpt, because Persia will surely break the deal at one point.

EDIT: looking at the map more closely I see that the Persians don't have horses, but Sumeria has a town just south of them with a source. This might complicate things :(

we should try and raze those 3 Sumer towns (Adana as well once it's Sumer), connect iron and upgrade, if that's possible.

btw, if we now mine the cows, we can get to 30spt while starving a little. but we can do that and maximise output

Microbe, do you know you are up? Not that you are too late with your 'got it', but I was used to you taking the game the moment that it was available...

preturn: I pay 38gpt and MA with Persia.

230BC: I switch to market due in 4 turns. I'll let AI fight a bit before we take offense.

210BC: Kill 2 MDIs and 2 archers.

190BC: Kill a few more units and lose a horse.

170BC: Kill 2 more.

IBT market -> horse.

150BC: Kill 4 more MDIs. The killing zone works perfect.

IBT Netherlands and Sumeria make peace.

130BC: sign RoP with Hitties.

110BC: elite horse kill redlined archer..

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-firstLeader.jpg

I use it to rush cathedral.

90BC: Persia has got Theology. :(

IBT Persia kills 2 EW. It builds Knights Templar. :(

70BC: there are 2 reg EWs in Tyrana but we lose 3 horses in killing it including two elites. We gain 3 slaves.

IBT Dutch is destroyed.

50BC: we have 20% WW.

10AD: Inca and Persia MA vs Sumeria.

30AD: Persia has iron for sale for 11gpt. But Harran might fall soon.

IBT Sumeria razes Hittie town to our east. We get Chivalry.

50AD: note, we can buy iron now and start building knights, or we could wait for a couple of turns for Harran to be razed, and create iron colony.

Persia is going to be a big problem. It researches too fast. We need to turn the tide at some point. We have 5 turn MA left.

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-50AD.jpg

Microbe, do you know you are up? Not that you are too late with your 'got it', but I was used to you taking the game the moment that it was available...

I can tell you were away for too long. :) Things are a bit different now.

ok, got it, will play late tonight or tomorrow

one stupid question though 50BC: we have 20% WW.how can you actually tell how many %. the amount you need to increse lux?

save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-300AD.SAV)

Pre-turn
see that the cows are still not mined, so no 30spt possible. will change that, we do not need growth now since we are at 12pop

IT Harran is Persian, this is not good. but we can connect iron

1.70AD
send workers to road forrest to connect iron

IT Persians send a lot of units inot Harran. and in the end the town flips, that will hurt, at least 5 immortals and 2 AC's gone. what a twist :goodjob:

2. 90AD
time to move in and raze that town, move in many units on hill, see 5 Sumer MDI behind it

IT MDI fight and lose outside town, then Harran gets attacks by Persian units we can't see, Sumer lose 2 units but hold the town :)
that's extremely lucky.

3. 110AD
attack, lose horse immediately, then beat 3 units and raze it, take 2 slaves, next turn we will have iron, change build to court for shields
adjust production so we get 70shields after 3 turns for a knight

IT Hittities move in the MDI and thus get the counters from Sumer not us, nice of them

4. 130AD
iron is online now, since it's within our borders. upgrade 2 spears and 3 horses

5. 150AD
upgrade another 3 horses, we have 7 knights now

IT our deal with Persia is up, do not renew. Persia must be still having GA since they are so strong now. That's why Sumer were so strong initially as well
our GA will come once we have sipahi.
I don't think we can match Persia at the moment knights against their GA immortals and AC, we better wait
Persia found Tyre and that will snatch the iron sooner or later :mad:

6. 170AD
chopped the forrest hoping for BG but it is just G. since we will lose iron again, mine cows
make peace with Sumer and get 72g and 35gpt, they must be desperate

IT wine now online
Inca learn theology, we will get that soon

7. 190AD
nth much

IT Sumer and Hittities sign peace
as expected we learn Theology

8. 210AD
Persia of course knows education, GL might soon be obsolete. guess Hittities will face our army once their border exands to take away horses

9. 230AD
nth much

10. 250AD
nothing

IT Kisurra founded to snatch our wine away

11. 260AD
tech pace is too slow and I fear Persia runs away, steal invention immediately and since they have gunpowder, steal that as well :D
they have chemistry also, we have 1400g left and make 100gpt. they have salt to trade, but we have no MT yet
feel twice is enough luck for one round, better don't try 3 times

12. 270AD
we better get to MT as soon as possible, go for another steal and we get chemistry, finally Persia is not up any more :D
will now wait until they get metal or do we want to self research? we could get it in 19 turns, thats not worth the effort

IT Inca demand silks, but won't cave, they bugger off. I don't feel good about trading with Inca since the route goes through Hittite land and
we might have to fight them

13. 280AD nth much

IT Kissura gets razed and we get our wines back

15. 300AD nth much
kept on building knights since they upgrade to sipahi. Persia is up education and most likely more techs up that path, but we better save the money for metal and MT
we have now 10 knights, 1175g and make around 100gpt

our land
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag13300.jpg

kept on building knights since they upgrade to Sipahi. Persia is up education and most likely more techs up that path, but we better save the money for metal and MT
Copernicus is NOT being built. They may not be further up that path. I don't know if it is the war, or lack of tech why they aren't building it.


We need to make a decision soon on Copernicus. Without it space race and 20K are not possible. We will be locked into conquest as the only viable option.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
Microbe
ThERat (just played)
Gyathaar (up)
Greebley (on deck)
LKendter

Stunning steal luck :eek: I suggest to go for knights and MT and then attack Persia with our Sipahi.

I know that we like to have Copernicus, but I still lean towards going for MT asap. It's either one or the other. I think that we should get to our Super UU and GA asap to have the longest possible benefit from Sipahi. And OK, we might lose the iron, but for Sipahi we need horses and saltpeter.

Got it!
According to CivAssist we will end up with 17748 culture in 2050AD if we build no more culture buildings, so getting 20k victore is still possible (only problem would be preventing the AIs from getting victory before us if we are unable to win by conquest)

I had a look at the save a bit better. Our gpt is magnificent. This may allow us to go the Copernicus path when we are able to get Astronomy. But that means that we should switch to a wonder prebuild sooner rather than later. Next player's call I'd say.

I just remember from the previous OCC game (emperor) that we lost a lot of speed and money by getting Shakespeare. Later in the game this got us in a nasty position. Only the fact that we got ToE made our situation hopeful again. Astronomy however is a required tech to get to the next age. So that's another story.

I see culture by far as a less desirable win. I do believe that conquest or space are still valid options. We appear to be in control, more so than the emperor OCCC.

This may allow us to go the Copernicus path when we are able to get Astronomy.
My worry is by the time the Industrial Age arrives we simply can't keep up on science. One city is lousy for revenue and research. I want this to give us a chance to not fall to far behind in tech.

It's a very difficult decision to make.

If we go for Copernicus, we need to research Education/Astronomy ourselves. There is currently no wonder to prebuild with I think. We may make it, but it's hard to tell.

Otherwise, we'll not be able to keep up in tech by self-researching, but we could steal or buy. It is doable as we didn't get Copernicus in the emperor game either. With Sipahi we can rule the world for a long time, so tech isn't a big issue to me.

The problem is Persia is clearly running away in tech, and we need to stop it.

I am currently a bit inclined to beelining to sipahi. Do we have saltpeter?

I don't think that we should research Education. We get it from TGL. We can buy saltpeter from...Persia!

I had a look at the save a bit better. Our gpt is magnificent. This may allow us to go the Copernicus path when we are able to get Astronomy. But that means that we should switch to a wonder prebuild sooner rather than later. Next player's call I'd say.

I read this just as Astronomy was available, so I decided to go for Copernicus :p

300AD, turn 0:
Persia will give us saltpeter and 57 gold for silks, but we have no need for saltpeter atm.

IBT:
Hittites start Sixtine, and then Leo's

310AD, turn 1:
nothing

IBT:
Persia and hittites ally vs summeria
Persia offers us RoP for alliance vs summeris.. no deal :)

knight -> knight

320AD, turn 2:
nothing

IBT:
As normal watch a lot of persian and Summerians fight it out by our borders

330AD, turn 3:
nothing

IBT:
zzzz

340AD, turn 4:
notice our income has gone up despite builing units, and see he have gotten more tourism income

both inca and persia has education now, so GLib will expire next turn

IBT:
we learn education

knight -> university

350AD, turn 5:
Persia has astronomy

disband a regular warrior in istanbul and shortrush the university with a courthouse

IBT:
University -> sixtine (as prebuild for copernicus)

360AD, turn 6:
We will now reach 20k in 2042AD, so that option is still open.


370AD, turn 7:
nothing

380AD, turn 8:
Persia has banking now aswell..

IBT:
summeria want RoP and alliance vs hittites, say no

390AD, turn 9:
nothing

400AD, turn 10:
nothing

410AD, turn 11:
I see that peace deal with summeria will run out, so I turn off always reneg deals.

IBT:
Summeria renegs the peace deal despite the fact that I turned that off ?

420AD, turn 12:
the extra gold per turn from the peace deal is gone, so down to 60gpt now (since working high shield tiles for the prebuild)

IBT:
summeria and inca sign peace

430AD, turn 13:
persia and inca has printing press..

sell chemistry to incas for PP and 25gpt (one tech closer to shakespares if the AIs should research that)

Steal costs from persia seems to go up around 40 gold per turn, so decide to stop waiting for them to sell astronomy, and attempt a safe steal (could finally buy it now, but it would cost everything we had)

Safe steal is successful, take astronomy.

Copernicus due in 8 turns.

440AD, turn 14:
nothing

450AD, turn 15:

Copernicus is due in 6 turns. Noone else is building it, thou it could fall to a cascade since Leo's and Sixtine is still not finished.

The save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13_450AD.SAV)

Nice going Gyathaar. But as I see it we can get ourselves a lux and get luxury to 0%. Cops is a very nice extra if we'd get it. We now only need banks besides the obvious huge stack of Sipahi.

EDIT: I'd consider getting Cops a small miracle. It normally gets eaten in a cascade.

EDIT2: Our research speed would be very decent at 100%. We'd get Metallurgy in 12. Not that I like full research. I'd rather go the safe road. We need the money.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
Microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar (just played)
Greebley (up)
LKendter (on deck)

lots of things to comment:

after getting copernicus, we should focus on MT again. I'd say self research yes, if we can profit from it via trading. The reason I went for bold (and of course) lucky steals was simply due to the fact, there wasn't even a tech trading possible any longer and we couldn't afford to just sit and watch Persia run away. We need to raze some of their key cities.

sell chemistry to incas for PP and 25gpt this is exactly what I hoped for, tech brokering. and the reason I went for the steals

unfortunately salt is very far off to grab as a colony. I spotted some in Hittite and Inca land, but very far away. Trading with Persia is the only viable option. So, we need to get it, upgrade and then attack them 20 turns later

By the way, during my turns we were extremely lucky, that Harran was razed. When Persia took that town and subsequently send in a lot of units, I was so angry. you should have seen my face, when that town suddenly flipped :dance:
it took my a while to realize what happened, because the the turn sequence is Hittite, Sumer, Persia. I even reloaded later on just to see that again and laugh :D

I see no reason of full research after getting MT. Just follow AI research. The point is to slow AI (especially Persia) down, not by profitting from brokerage.

I see no reason of full research after getting MT. Just follow AI research. The point is to slow AI (especially Persia) down, not by profitting from brokerage.

I even see no point of full research to get MT. Same reason. I like the way things are going now.

I saw no reason for self research at all as well. I meant, only if we could get a tech ourselves for a follow up 2fer or so, then it would make sense. stealing and mongering our way up is the way to go for us with 0CC, copernicus doesn't change much.
are we still seeking Shakespeare or do we focus solely on MT and sipahi?

stealing and mongering our way up is the way to go for us with 0CC, copernicus doesn't change much.

Self-research is better if we get those scientific wonders.


are we still seeking Shakespeare or do we focus solely on MT and sipahi?

Persia is running away so we cannot waste time on the optional techs. We can build it when AI research it for us.

microbe: couldn't have said it better myself. Shakes only if we stumble upon it. Newton might be a more logical choice. But Sipahi are our first priority.

Greebley, do you know that you are up?

Ok, I got it. A bit of a feast mode for me.

Preturn: No Changes. Persia has Banking.

Early: Waiting for Copernicus

Mid: We get Copernicus and start a Colosseum (we may be able to go to 0 lux and the culture is nice).
Sistine and Leo's are completed. The Cascade is broken.

Late: Get Colosseum and we can lower Lux to 0%
There is a 2-fer avail if a steal works (steal Physics and trade for Banking).


560 AD:Safe steal fails and we are at war with Persia.

IBT: We have a Pike and some knights on our Iron. Persia loses 4 immortals, but kills a pike and a knight.

570 AD: We attack and kill 4 Immortals.
Buy Banking for 35 gpt and 460 gold (want Banking now to get addl money)

IBT: Not attacked on the mountains.

580 AD: Kill 3 Immortals

590 AD Kill 3 Immortals

600 AD: Don't attack this round.

Notes:
We are building a Bank that will be done in 2 turns.

Did some leader fishing. Got an Elite knight. Elite Horse generated no leader.

I kept on the 20K to keep it viable. The war was unfortunate, but unavoidable if we are going to steal our techs.

[Edit: I saw no reason to take out Tyre unless it gets a border expansion.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (on deck)
Microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter (currently playing)

Bad luck on the steal, but we can't win them all. I'm happy to see that Sumeria and Persia are still at war. And that we are able to face this big foe and even can aford building a bank instead of troops.

I hope that Persia doesn't get the opportunity to outresearch the rest of the tribes without us able to profit from it. And I hope that Sumeria and Persia don't make peace soon.

As war as I can see our biggest challenge is that we on the one hand have to get our techs and maybe even saltpeter from Persia but on the other hand don't like to see them grow even more. We had a similar situation in AG10, with France as our biggest friend but later on our biggest foe. But this is evil Persia, not nice France...

Bad luck on the steal, but we can't win them all the best part of it is, that the steals during my turns were 2 immediate and 1 careful and once we try safe, we get war :(
at least now we are far better prepared.

as for salt, I can see only one solution. build up knights, and get salt, upgrade them all and then beat Persia up

I kept on the 20K to keep it viable.
We will now win in 1982AD by 20K if we build no more culture buildings (and dont mobilize or sell off existing buildings)

We will now win in 1982AD by 20K if we build no more culture buildings (and dont mobilize or sell off existing buildings)

So we now have this as a back-up for a back-up. This has been done before and is nothing extremely special. Let's try to achieve that now :)

600 AD
We can't afford war with Sumeria also. With Copernicus money into research is more efficient. Once Persia talks and I can see their techs, I can make the steal vs. research decision. For the moment I stay on cash.


610 AD
(IT) I put Istanbul on -1 food to get to 30 shields a turn. I would prefer to man the fort line with pikes and free up the knights for potential offensives.


620 AD
(IT) The Inca and Persia sign peace.


630 AD
If this was a solo game I would have went with Metallurgy from 600 AD. I would have gone with Sipahi as long as possible before rifles. However, everyone in the game keeps talking about slowing the pace.

Persia is up to Physics, but doesn't have Metallurgy. I up the science rate to max to follow Persia with Physics. I would like a chance at Newton's. That would insure space race as a valid backup.


650 AD
(IT) The Inca stop paying us for Silks.


700 AD
(IT) The Inca demand silk. The Hittite choke city will keep their troops away for a long time. I tell them bite me, but no war starts.


740 AD
Tyre is RAZED for $27
The Inca start Smith's.


750 AD
My parting gift for the team:
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/LAK-583.jpg


==========================

Summary:
Total killed units: 13 immortals, 3 AC, 3 Muskets, and 1 crusader.
Total losses: 2 knights (vs. 1 hp musket and 1 hp immortal), 1 elite horseman, 1 pikeman and 1 warrior.
Units captured: 1 Sumerian catapult that was upgraded.

The Sumerian and Persia war has been a stalemate despite our help. Persia getting BOTH unit wonders is just so powerful.

I think we either need to go peaceful for a while and get Newton and Sipahi, or initiate a dog-pile against Persia now. By going peaceful Zeus will expire and weaken the Persian position.


ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (currently playing)
Microbe (on deck)
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-750AD.zip

Got it. Great going. I see that Persia is close to the Industrial age and that we can get a decent sum from them for peace.

I won't be able to play for Wednesday.

EDIT: At first glance I'd say that we'd better either had gone min science or for Military Tradition. Persia is up ToG and we are losing money while still 17 turns from it.

I'll be playing this tomorrow morning at the earliest. Tomorrow evening at the latest.

[quote]If this was a solo game I would have went with Metallurgy from 600 AD. I would have gone with Sipahi as long as possible before rifles. However, everyone in the game keeps talking about slowing the pace.[/bquote]

Ya, me too. The slower pace does make the 20k easier though. Probably makes conquests harder is the flip side.

I wasn't talking about slowing the pace (EDIT: I did, but didn't mean it this extreme)... I like Sipahi. But we are losing 13 gpt while researching a known tech and we are still 17 turns from it.

EDIT: So we are losing money needed for upgrades and buying the two techs towards Sipahi.

IHT: We have 20% war weariness. 20% of the unhapiness of our people is explained this way.

I don't understand why we are researching ToG at 40% (losing money) when Persia already has it. I stop research. I want to see us going for MT instead.

IT: Treb->knight. We lose the furs.

Turn 1 (760 AD) No need to buy the furs back. Persia has two saltpeter extra for trade, if we'd make peace. Selling world map gives me 3 gold. I do this every turn and won't mention it in the turnlog.

I redline a knight and immortal on a mountain. And a knight on grassland. My tactic is to redline the Persian troops and only attack the units when I can get to a safe position again. Sumeria can then help us with the other wounded troops.

4/4 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-3, our knight wins. [1-0]

IT: A lot of fighting between Sumeria and Persia.

Turn 2 (770 AD) An immortal is redlined.

4/4 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-1, our knight wins [2-0]

IT: 5/5 Crusader vs 4/4 pike on mountain: 3-5, our pike wins
4/4 knights vs 4/4 pike on mountain: 3-4, our pike wins and promotes
4/4 knight vs 4/4 knight on mountain: 4-3, Persian knight wins
4/4 knight vs 4/4 knight on mountain: 2-4, our knight wins [5-1]

Persia starts Shakes. They again didn't research Metallurgy.

Turn 3 (780 AD) I redline a vet knight and kill a redlined immortal with 4/4 knight. Trebs pillage the roads inside Persian borders. [6-1]

IT: Persian troops can't reach us this IT. Knight->knight. Hittites start Smith.

Turn 4 (790 AD) Crusader redlined by trebs. Elite knight kills the crusader, losing 3HP. [6-1]

IT: 5/5 AC vs 4/4 pike: 2-5, pike wins
4/4 knight vs 4/4 knight: 2-4, our knight wins [8-1] Sumeria starts Smith.

Turn 5 (800 AD) 2 immortals are redlined by our trebs.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 immortal: 1-0, knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 immortal: 1-1, knight wins and promotes. [10-1]

IT: 4/4 knight vs 4/4 pike: 2-4, pike wins. Sumerian troops start to use the safe road to Persia. [11-1]

Turn 6 (810 AD) Nothing much...

IT: knight->knight.

Turn 7 (820 AD) Trebs redline a musket and knight.

5/5 knight vs 1/4 musket: 1-1, knight wins and captures settler :)
5/5 knights vs 3/4 immortal: 3-3, knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-0, knight wins. [14-1]

IT: 4/4 knight vs 4/4 pike: 4-2, Persian knight wins
4/4 knight vs 4/4 pike: 4-3, Persian knight wins :(

Sumeria starts Shakes. Adana expands borders, we lose our horses. [14-3]

Turn 8 (830 AD) I redline 2 knights, a crusader and a musket.
5/5 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-1, our knight wins.
5/5 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-0, our knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 knight: 1-0, our knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/5 cruader: 1-0, knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 musket: 1-1, knight wins. [19-3]

Turn 9 (840 AD) Persia now has Metallurgy!

I redline a musket and immortal.
5/5 knight vs 1/4 musket: 1-0, knight wins.
4/4 knight vs 1/4 immortal: 1-1, knight wins. [21-3]

I make peace with Persia for 1040 gold (they pay :) ). Lux tax to 0%, we make 117 gpt. We can get a MPP with Persia, so their free tech is Nationalism :( I try a careful steal for 1327 gold. Steal succeeds and we get Metallurgy!

We still have 792 gold. I set science to 100%. We will have MT in 7 this way, losing 67 gpt. I think that Persia will go for Communism/Fascism instead of MT. That wouldn't be bad!

IT: The Inca declare on Sumeria and start Shakes. Knight->treb.

Turn 10 (850 AD) We MUST have the saltpeter. We want to have knights, cannons and Sipahi (those are in 6 turns). Persia is the only one with an extra resource. So I sell silks and 3 gpt for saltpeter. We give Sumeria our last silks and 15 gold for Horses and Spices.

We are now building a cannon, ready in 2. I mm-ed for 20 spt and income. We are doing -72 gpt, have 711 gold and MT is in 6. I didn't buy world map. I think that we need the money for upgrades.

IT: Sumeria advances more and more into Persian lands.

Turn 11 (860 AD) Nothing much.

IT: cannon->knight.

Turn 12, 13 (870, 880 AD) :sleep:

Turn 14 (890 AD) Science to 80%, we lose 36 gpt and have 419 gold.

IT: knight->knight.

Turn 15 (900 AD) We are 1 turn from MT. Science to 70%, MT in 1. No other tribe has it.

We don't want to be at peace with Persia for long. And we certainly don't want a long-lasting peace deal between Sumeria and Persia. They are still at war, but I think that we should dogpile Persia again within 5-10 turns. We need enough Sipahi of couse. And for that we need the Persian saltpeter. That saltpeter is far north in the Persian core (2 sources). Hittites have Magnetism. We might be able to trade with them next turn. Persia already reached the IA, Inca are level and Sumeria is backward, missing Metallurgy.

I'd stop research after MT. Although we will get the free tech in the IA, which will allow us to trade something. Persia is the runaway civ, but Sumeria leads in score and culture.

900 AD save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-900AD.zip)

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (just played)
Microbe (up)
ThERat (on deck)
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter

what's our short term strategy? get salt from Persia, so we got 20 more turns of peace? we have 14 left anyway.
but we got no horses, should we fight Hittites for a while to get rid of Adana?

We already have horses from Sumeria. And salt from Persia, but if we get them to declare (by trying to kick them out of our lands or another way) we will be at war a lot sooner than in 14 turns.

I guess that it can't harm a lot us to stay at peace for 15 turns, but this depends on the developments. It would be nice to keep Persia from Cavalry, but I think that won't work and certainly not if we wait too long. I think that we need at least 15 Sipahi, which we can have very soon indeed. We also need muskets.

EDIT: I like us too fight Persia. They are the big threat and we shouldn't allow them to grow. I wouldn't have made peace, but had to for Metallurgy and Saltpeter. If we can cripple them and raze about 3 core cities, then it's time to look at Hittites, Sumeria and Inca.

We already have horses from Sumeria. And salt from Persia, but if we get them to declare (by trying to kick them out of our lands or another way) we will be at war a lot sooner than in 14 turns.
now that you mention it, I can see it. did you edit your post or am I really getting horrible senile :crazyeye:

agree with your other plans

I mentioned it, but I will now put the Sumerian deal in Italic as well, so it sticks out.

OK I played one turn and here is the situation.

Hitties MA with Persia vs Sumeria.

1. Military+72gpt could give us ToG from Persia, and could get us into Industrial Ages, but then we'd be locked into longer peace (20 turns). We could build more sipahi in the mean time.

2. We could sell MT to other AI to get Magnetism, and/or sell to Persia for its 1438g+some gpt, and attempt a steal at some point (in 10 turns) to get ToG. In the mean time we build Sipahi. We could build only 2 in 10 turns though.

3. Get Persia's 1438g by gpt, upgrade our 4 vet knights and attempt a steal immediately for ToG. If it succeeds, it's definitely the best plan. If not, we are at war and only have 4 sipahi.

I am not sure which way to go. I like to have more sipahis (like 10+) before we fight Persia.

Also, how is the idea that a short war with Hitties? We could raze the choke and get our horses back, and get us a GA. Maybe we can even build Newton or Shakespear by it (or not?).

I'll play the rest tomorrow and give you a chance for discussion.

OK. Opportunity knocks!

I'm very afraid of the Persian cavalry/rifle combo that WILL come. But naturaly we can't avoid it. They will have them in 5 turns or earlier anyway.

We really want rifles too.

It might indeed be best to deal with Persia to get us in the IA. This may make it possible to sell a free tech to Persia, giving us a lot of money and gpt. Although the gpt shouldn't blind us. If feel that we will be at war again before the 20 turns are up.

EDIT: We might even be able to go for ToE.

microbe might be right that a Hittite short war is a good idea. They COULD however ask the Persians/Sumerians to join. Can we afford that?

My tactic is to redline the Persian troops and only attack the units when I can get to a safe position again.
That sounds familiar. That was the same tactic I was using with the one exception of some yellowed units to raze the city.


I'd stop research after MT.
Does this mean you are hoping for conquest with Sipahi? Even they have trouble with rifles...

Lee, no research at all anymore? No I don't mean that this drastically! Good thing that you ask me this :) I meant that we shouldn't needlessly spend money while we can buy our way into the IA. We'd need the money for ugrades. And once we have enough troops to start doing damage we could go researching again.

But as soon as we have a chance to get ToE we should go for it I'd say. The AI will research the government techs first, so we'd have a chance to go to Scientific Method.

Things have changed a bit now. We CAN get into the IA which changes everything (except for the need for more Sipahi).

I don't mind 20 turns of peace with Persia. We can afford to attack other civs in this game.

I would like to enter the IA and see where the coal is. If there is one nearby that may determine who I would like to attack.

I don't understand why we are researching ToG at 40% (losing money) when Persia already has it. I stop research.
I can sum that up in 1 word - Newton's. Persia still isn't building it after your turns. Regardless of how we want to win I feel Newton's is needed to keep up with research in the IA. In addition, it greatly increases the odds for the backup plans of Space and 20K.

Given that we lost our horses, I think attacking hittites and removing that town makes sense to me. Lets grab the choke again. (i.e. put a unit there so it isn't resettled)

I can sum that up in 1 word - Newton's. Persia still isn't building it after your turns. Regardless of how we want to win I feel Newton's is needed to keep up with research in the IA. In addition, it greatly increases the odds for the backup plans of Space and 20K.

I understand the reason and I really love to have Newton. But I bet that we will lose a Newton race in a cascade. The AI is building Smith, Shakes and Bach. Also: I felt that we needed troops and money in a war vs the super-power and that we didn't have room for 14 turns of research towards ToG losing money. If we buy ToG now we are only 3 turns later than with a self-research.

I agree with Greebley on the choke.

Summary: some difficult decisions to make, but in the end we control the choke, get a GA, Newton due next turn, have Nationalism and 1294g, and are still making +206gpt!

preturn: Hitties join the party and MA against Sumeria.

910AD: We get Military Tradition.

Now what to do? We can build a sipahi every 4 turns, but we could also build Newton's in 16 turns if we have the tech. I think it's worth having Newton's and then focus on military for the whole Industrial Ages. And what if we have an GA?

I sell MT to Persia for 36gpt+1437g (full price).

I upgrade 8 knights and 3 pikes by 990g.

We could sell MT+450g to get Magnetism from Hitties, but then it'd have cavs, so no way. I set research to ToG in 6 turns with -40gpt (MM very important. By one less commerce it'd be 7 turns).

MT to Sumeria for Navigation+28g+27gpt. I get Navigation as we could use Magallan's as prebuild for Newton's. With GA this is going to be faster.

920AD: Upgrade two more pikes. Declare on Hitties and move trebs next to Adana. We have 3 muskets defending, and 3 elite knights, but the elite knights show on top. :hmm:

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-GA.jpg

IBT 6 Hittie knights come out and some enter our territory, but none attack our fortified elite knight and our treb stack!

930AD: I sign RoP with Sumeria so it could move faster.

We lose a sipahi and raze Adana (3 muskets + LBM).

Kill 3 knights.

940-950AD: Kill some units at the choke. It's great killing zone.

IBT Persia starts JS Bach.

960AD: Hitties agree to talk, and it has MT now. I make peace and pay 2g for Magnetism. :lol: What a nice war with only 6 sipahi to use!

I then move musketman onto the choke.

IBT we enter IA and draw Nationalism as free tech! This is terrific. Inca builds Smith's.

970AD: Persia is up only Communism.

I shut off research for now.

Sumeria seems to have no saltpeter. It's tough for knights and pikemen to fight cav and riflemen, so at some point we need to help them.

990AD: IBT Persia gets a leader.

1000AD: We'll get Newton next turn.

I'll stop here.

We'll get Newton next turn. I think we need it more than Shakespear. But if people think we want Shake, we can trade for Democracy and Free Artistry and switch to it.

Then we should go full speed on Sipahi/rifle production and start dogpiling Persia. It's still researching fast at Monarchy (it just got Steam).

I also think we should block Sumeria to get to Persia, as it's better for it to fight in its home land rather than move units to the front simply being killed by those cavs.

We should consider gifting Sumeria into IA and maybe use Nationalism to get its free tech (if it's steam). Maybe not now, but before Sumeria starts to lose cities.

EDIT: I shut off research for a couple of turns, but we should turn it back on as with Copernicus and Newton researching gives more benefit to us. We should beeline to RP.

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-1000AD.jpg

Great job microbe! I'm amazed that we are able to get a 2nd science wonder in our city on demigod :D I agree with the path. We want to be at war with Persia very soon. We must help out Sumeria. As long as we are comfortable defending our lands it's a good idea to be at war with the superpower. It would even be better with Espionage, but we are not there yet. A war is good for conquest AND space I feel. But I'm still voting for conquest. It's seems possible. We are doing far better than in the Emperor game, aren't we?



ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
Microbe (just played)
ThERat (up)
Gyathaar (on deck)
Greebley
LKendter

got it, either late tonight or tomorrow

save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-1150AD.SAV)

Pre-turnassign citizens so we make 216gpt
we atill have a deal with Persia for 11 more turns, unless we get them to declare on us, we can't do a thing
set up a path for Sumer that they can occupy the mountains for better defense

IT Sumer using it, but Cav's are too strong for them, Persia founds a new city right in our face
Newton finishes, sipahi in 3

1. 1010AD
steam takes still 8 turns, maybe we gift Sumer
give Sumer ToG and magnetism for economics, MT and WM
they get medicine :cry: . ask Persia to leave and they declare
get Inca to join for nationalism , they also give 26gpt and democracy
kill 3 Cavs

IT Sumer and Persia fight in our territory, we do not get attacked

2. 1020AD
move carefully as not to lose precious sipahis

IT Sumer and Persia slug it out, that's ncie, Sumer doing better, gets a leader also

3. 1030AD
defeat 3 rilfes in that town, defeat one more cav and raze it for 2 slaves
defeat a cav outside

IT no counter, Sumer push more units forward, we get another sipahi
set production to rifle in 2

4. 1040AD nth much

IT Persia is asking for peace already. inca finish Shakespeare

5. 1050AD nth much

IT Persia and Sumer sign peace, Sumer got nationalism for it

6. 1060AD nth much
defeat a Cav and get Sumer back for 560g, they won't accept gpt, did we do sth wrong before?

IT we get steam, where is the coal?

9. 1090AD
Inca got 2 coal, Persia 1, Sumer 1 but not connected
trade steam with Sumer for medicine and wine, so they can give us coal soon
deal with Inca as well, so we got a second source since Sumer didn't connect yet
trade steam for 80gpt, 90g
we can set research to 1005 and get electricity in 10 still making 57gpt

IT our golden age ends

13. 1130AD
bactra is donw to pop 8, they must be pop rushing
electricity still in 7. GA end didn't hurt that much, but we only make 27spt for 1 rifle every 3 turns

15. 1150AD
Hittite border expanded and the choke is under their control, but we close one step behind

the war continues to be exclusive affairs amongst the others, we have not been attacked once
yet I feel we can't afford to attack oursleves. coal was not connected for us still.
at least tech pace is slow and Persia is fascist now, inca revolted into monarchy
electricity in 5

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/ag131150a.jpg

Without access to the game but having read the turnlog I say: good job! :D It looks like we are in a great position. I can't believe it! Soon we will have artillery and we have a shot at ToE.

You say that you traded Medicine for Medicine with Sumeria. I assumeyou mean Steam for Medicine?

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
Microbe
ThERat (just played)
Gyathaar (up)
Greebley (on deck)
LKendter

yup, are correct, changed the log. steam for medicine

actually, tech pace is considerably slower and with persia being fascist, it caqn only get better for us. let's hope we can trade for coal sooner

Do we want to keep building rifles, or switch to knights for upgrades when we get salt again?
If we mobilize, we can make 39spt I believe when building units, but this would slow down any possible 20k victory (newton's dropped date to 1958AD)

If we mobilize, we can make 39spt I believe when building units, but this would slow down any possible 20k victory (newton's dropped date to 1958AD)

I won't mobilize until we are 100% sure of conquest being the win type. At the moment conquest seems good, but you never now. Mobilize throws 20K out the window.

I noticed the leader is STILL in the capitol. This is why I think leaving a leader in a city is dangerous. Have we giving any thought to how to use him?

Now if we could only get coal somehow...

Another thought - we have a RoP with Sumeria. Do we want to send workers to connect the other coal in hopes we can get it in trade?

Not much to use the leader on unless we can capture 3 cities in a single turn...

The closest builds we can use leader to rush is factory, hospital, stick exchange or CIA

Only available thing to rush is a courthouse.. and that would be a huge waste :)

Edit: Actually.. Persia is willing to give us either Akshak or Vitcos for peace, doubtful for both.. so if we can manage to get them to the point where they will give up both plus we capture Bactra in same turn we could make an army

I don't think I want to ruin 20k yet. I wouldn't mobilize until we are sure we can destroy the civs.

Also lets make sure there aren't annoying 1 square islands. We should trade for world map.

I am surprised to find we declared so fast. We needed more sipahi before we could fight, and we lost gpt from Persia. Why in such a rush?

I am surprised to find we declared so fast. We needed more sipahi before we could fight, and we lost gpt from Persia. Why in such a rush?

True, I thought the same thing after I posted my first response... This small stack of Sipahi is annoying indeed.

Also lets make sure there aren't annoying 1 square islands. We should trade for world map.

This is the continent:

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-1150ADcontinent.jpg

There are islands. But we don't know everything yet:

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13-1150ADislands.jpg

Edit: Actually.. Persia is willing to give us either Akshak or Vitcos for peace, doubtful for both.. so if we can manage to get them to the point where they will give up both plus we capture Bactra in same turn we could make an army

Good idea! But we have an MA and when that's gone so will probably this great deal. They want to pay extra because of the Sumeria-MA.

And I think that we should build knights as well, for an upgrade.

EDIT: deleted incorrect comment about coal. Sumeria has two possible sources (not one).

Good idea! But we have an MA and when that's gone so will probably this great deal. They want to pay extra because of the Sumeria-MA.

And I think that we should build knights as well, for an upgrade.

EDIT: deleted incorrect comment about coal. Sumeria has two possible sources (not one).
We have 11 turns left on MAs, will aim to capture a city at end of that and ger 2 in peace so can make an army

Both Inca and Summeria has 2 coals each, one connected and one unconnected

Any preference on what to research next?
Replaceable parts for faster workers, atrillery and infantery
Sanitation so we can grow bigger
Industrialization for factory
Sci Methods for ToE

I am leaning towards Sanitation myself since AIs are usually slow at getting that, and getting our city to size 21 would increase gold/science and shields by a lot...

RP, definitely. We can't build sipahi, so we build artillery. And if we have rubber..

I wouldn't research Sanitation. We are barely happy-even at size-12, and more pop gives very little benefit, plus the pop pollution.

Industrialization might be the 2nd choice.

We are barely happy-even at size-12
10% lux would be more than enough to keep us happy at size 21

Rep Parts sounds like a good idea. Then I would go Sanitation or Sci Method, depending on the fact if AI can get to ToE first. I would definately want Sanitation soonish.

Good idea! But we have an MA and when that's gone so will probably this great deal. They want to pay extra because of the Sumeria-MA.


Almost certainly. We have almost NOTHING to use to attack. This war is pretty pointless without being able to go on offense. I am very disappointed. We have to make peace, build sipahi, then come back. It's a long time before we could hurt Persia.

Rep Parts sounds like a good idea. Then I would go Sanitation or Sci Method, depending on the fact if AI can get to ToE first. I would definately want Sanitation soonish.

If so, then go for Sanitation first.

We need to decide how to proceed with the war plan. If we can't go on offense for a long time, then delay RP to the AI would be good to do, otherwise when we get enough sipahi's they'd already have infantry. I'm afraid we'll lose the window to effectively use our sipahi against rifles.

We have to make peace, build sipahi, then come back.
We can't break the MA deal, unless we choose to have Sumeria declare war. That would mean that we have to fight Sumeria for a while and then get back to Persia. I expect no peace with Sumeria for 10 turns then. But at least we can get Sipahi...

We can end the ROP now (and also some resource lux deals!!).

We can't break the MA deal, unless we choose to have Sumeria declare war.

We have to wait until the MA is over, then another 20 turns for peace. That's why I said it's a long time. Even then we'd probably not have enough sipahi. I'd like to see 10-15 sipahi before we take on Persia again.

I think we need to get Sanitation and Industrialization in the mean time to improve our production.

OK, we missed a big opportunity here. But at least Sipahi are very effective until TOW.

OTOH, could we afford a war against Hitties? They have saltpeter (although that's pretty far). We could build rifles, so we could manage a big stack of them with those trebs. We have to do this after MA though. If we could kill them, we could even merge their workers to get to max pop immediately.

I think we need to do this anyway at some point, as we need permanent source of saltpeter.

OK, we missed a big opportunity here. But at least Sipahi are very effective until TOW.
I agree with you. I really was hoping for Sipahi during the age of muskets.

=======================

A factory with rails and Hoover could give us 1 turn military units. I would head toward ToE. If nothing else we need to deny Hoover to the AI. They will be hard enough to fight without a production booster.

I would avoid RP as that may speed up the AI getting to Infantry. At that point AI fighting is useless.

A factory with rails and Hoover could give us 1 turn military units. I would head toward ToE. If nothing else we need to deny Hoover to the AI. They will be hard enough to fight without a production booster.


I am absolutely against Hoover. This is a rather small world and it takes ages for AI to get to that tech. Even ToE isn't as big a deal to me. We need to push for military. The only thing I think it vital is factory (and MAYBE coal plant).

its turn 5, persia allied hittites vs us and inca after first making a trade embargo vs us :(
hittites captured the incan lux town, and thus broke the ivory and 80gpt incas was paying us, so research at higher than 70% is at a loss...

replacable parts will take 12 turns at 90% and -39gpt.
(sanitation 8 turns, ToE 9 turns, industrialization 10 turns)

The trade embargo will prevent us from buying salt from persia after the war unless persia and hittitites go to war..

So the choice is clear. We just take on Hitties. Let's go for Sanitation then.

EDIT: by the way, we shouldn't be blocking Sumeria after we get into the war with Persia.

I'm interested in the way we got to war with the Persians. I await the turnlog. How can we take on the Hittites while at war with Persia? Persia won't talk for a loooooong time (this being the 3rd or 4th war).

Persia will talk.. we have been to war with them for around 20 turns...

Both hittites and incas have weak armies vs us, so we can most likely kill off hittites if we want...

Still 6 turns left of our alliance vs Persia with sumeria.. persia has 2 size 1 towns and 1 size 2 town, so getting 2 of them for peace after capturing one town should be no problem...

Sorry Gythaar. Drank too much (1 glass) :crazyeye:

It costed 2 sipahi ( I should have attacked with knights first :( ) but we have an empty army now...
I assume I should make a sipahi army?

You assume correctly. This changes a lot. It won't be attacked and is a superb pillaging weapon :) And of course a lean mean killing machine!

Nice! Sipahi army! This means we'll always have sipahi to attack. :D Backed with an SoD of artillery, which we could always build, plus some riflemen, we could already go on offense toward even Persia. (did we make peace?)

Let's get the saltpeter if possible, then we can win the game!

Nice! Sipahi army! This means we'll always have sipahi to attack. :D Backed with an SoD of artillery, which we could always build, plus some riflemen, we could already go on offense toward even Persia. (did we make peace?)

Let's get the saltpeter if possible, then we can win the game!

I agree completely! Persia needs to learn a lesson :) If we have peace we can make them decalre without any effort at all. Just order them to leave. But I like to see Sumeria join the party. We can't fight on two fronts as OCC.

Oh, we have a lot of trebs. Upgrading is too expensive. They should be disbanded to accelerate artillery builds.

Oh, we have a lot of trebs. Upgrading is too expensive. They should be disbanded to accelerate artillery builds.
I agree with the condition that we keep the foreign ones. The cost ZERO gold to maintain.

(did we make peace?)

Let's get the saltpeter if possible, then we can win the game!
Yes, had to make peace to get the 4th town (captured 2)

We are still at war with Hittites,and they have salt too.. however we cant buy salt from Persia yet for another 5 tuwns I think, because they have a trade embargo vs us

Neither persia (they took the extra coal from incas) or sumeria has connected their 2nd coal yet.

1150AD, turn 0:
Switch build from rifle, move citizens around to make 24 shields per turn and more gold.. but it has no effect of number of turns left to electrisity, but will most likely allow to drop research a notch later.

IBT:
Summeria kills persian cav
persia kills summerian rifle

1160AD, turn 1:
incas has a worker for sale, give them WM and 110gold for it

IBT:
summeria and incas sign peace
summeria kills summerian rifle..
Hittites and persia signs trade embargo vs us.. that will make buying salt a bit harder..
hittites and persia ally vs inca
Persia kills summerian rifle and longbow

summeria start JS Bachs

1170AD, turn 2:
redline persian rifle, then kill it and yellow cav with sipati
can lower sci to 80%

IBT:
Persia and hittites ally vs us.. hmm..
persia loose 2 cavs, summeria a longbow and a rifle

knight -> knight

1180AD, turn 3:
hmm.. no enemy units in range.. so I use 2 sipati to pillage the fort and road on the choke

we are making negative gpt.. did hittites declaing on us broke the gold and ivory deal from incas..?
no.. we still have a valid trade route.. and now i see hittites captured the incan town with the ivory, so that broke the deal..
in addition to this Persia captured Oilantayambo in the same turn.. looks like incas are in trouble.

IBT:
persia moves a cav onto a grassland tile inside our territory

1190AD, turn 4:
redline the cav, then kill it with sipati (no loss of hp)
drop sci to 70%

IBT:
2 more persian cavs move into killzone

1200AD, turn 5:
electrisy comes in, set to replaceable parts.. 90% sci is -39gpt in 12 turns.. I decide to set it at 70% for 15 turns with -1gpt so we have a money researve invce we get a chance to do an upgrade turn.

redline and kill the 2 persian cavs

IBT:
Persia sends another cav to be turned into sausages

knight -> knight

1210AD, turn 6:
Persia got industrialization...
redline and kill the cav

IBT:
another persian cav arrives

1220AD, turn 7:
kill the cav

IBT:
Incas will no longer pay is 26gpt for alliance vs persia.. I dont renew it

1230AD, turn 8:
I start to move stack of units towards nearest persian town

IBT:
knight -> knight

1240AD, turn 9:
keep moving towards Bactra.. cant barely squeeze though all the sumerian units..

IBT:
Get attacked by hittite cav in persian lands.. we take no damage and the cav retreats

sumerians and persians dish it out

1250AD, turn 10:
kill the redlined cav

IBT:
persian and summerian units fight next to our stacks

1255AD, turn 11:
units finally in place to attack next turn

IBT:
Hittites want peace for steam.. :D

knight -> knight

1260AD, turn 12:
time to attack...

Bactra is defended by a constript and a vetrifle.. dont even need all cannons to redline them..

kill the constript with a rifle
kill the vet with the 2nd rifle (keep the sipati and knights in reserve incase I have to attack another town)

capture the town with a cannon
They will still only give one of the size 1 towns :(

attack Gordium with sipahi, get hit by cannon, do one damage to rifle and retreat
next sipahi attacks fully healed vet rifle, and kill it (but redline)
sipahi does one damage and retreats from 3/3 rifle
4/4 sipahi dies to 3/4 rifle (first loss :( )
4/4 sipahi dies to 2/4 rifle (2nd loss)
4/4 sipahi kills 1/3 rifle
4/4 sipahi kills 1/4 rifle.. capture Gordium with 2 slaves and a cannon

cancel the alliance vs persia with sumeria just in case

make peace with persia for Vilcabamca and 360gold

make an army with the leader...

Cant buy salt from Persia because of the trade embargo they have with hittites..

Getting persia to declare on hittites would cost 44gpt, so I would rather wait for it to expire and build up knights in meantime...
We can take on hittites with just knights and sipati army I think...

sell off the improvements in the 3 towns and abandon them

have to raise lux to 10% from the inherited unhappiness from drafing and poprushing
sci to 60% for replacable parts in 9 turns

IBT:
Persia founds a new towns between the 2 ruins.. ontop of a cow :D

Hittites captured the Incan capital..

1265AD, turn 13:
Just troop movements back towards our lands again

IBT:

Persia start JS Bachs
we loose wines

1270AD, turn 14:
We dont need wines since has have to run 10% lux anyway, so i dont tryto renew it

put 3 sipahi into army

IBT:
Hittites actually attack one of our rifles in fort/barricades at choke with a cav.. rifleman loose one hp..

Summeria wants to trade us free atristery for electrisity... no deal :p

knight -> knight

1275AD, turn 15:
Incas has taken back their old capital.. either though flip or military.. most likely flip since that is the shakespare town

I left army, knights, sipahi and the cannons unmoved.. I assume you want to send them into Hittite territory and perhaps take out some of their towns.. perhaps even take out their salt town so we can upgrade knights before we abandon it (or make a colony)

The Save (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13_1275AD.SAV)

Sounds like we are doing quite well. I will have to look at the game when I get home (or after Gyathaar posts). The decisions discussed so far sound good to me AFAICT (as far as I can tell).

Great job Gyathaar! Way to go to get us that army. I'm undecided on what to do now. We could wait with the Persian war in favour of saltpeter of the Hittites. Otoh Persia is BIG.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie
Microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar (just played)
Greebley (up)
LKendter (on deck)

I just made peace with persia.. thou it prolly isnt hard to get them into war again :p

Persia is the only ones that can sell us salt (when the trade embargo ends in 5 turns, or we ally them vs hittites)

Persia still has monopoly on industrialization, but it would cost us electrisity and over 100gpt to get that I think it was

Currently we have no active deals exceptthe peace deal with persia and rop and lux deals with sumeria (that can be cancelled I believe)

I would try to get saltpeter from Hitties and be done with that.

We shouldn't pay gpt to get techs from Persia. Money is better spent on self-research with our scientific wonders. Brokering with weaker AIs is another matter.

I got it. I have 2 games to play, but since they are both OCC, I may be able to turn this around tonight.

some comments:

I want explain the strategy for my moves a little, because I felt I get a little flamed. :(

I got Persia to declare against us soon, since it would take us a long time to get more sipahis to do real damage to a STRONG Persia. I allied Inca and Sumer in order to weaken Persia and that worked well, well enough for Gyathaar to take out 2 cities, because Persia had burned a lot of units.
I set up the strategy such that Persian units would always attack Sumer in our land. As I wrote, they did not attack us a single time. At the same time they changed to fascist which slowed there tech pace a lot. The whole world at war is defenitely better than us trying to do the rat race for techs.

Actually I opened the mountains for Sumer to use during those turns. I would redline or ping Persian units (I upgraded trebs to cannons for 30g each since trebs versus rifles are not that effective). I wold only attack redlined units in the open, units on mountain I would leave for Sumer to clear (Note: Sumer take their turn before Persia). it all worked out well and now we even have an army.

The Incan were very close to the 2nd Persian salt source and I had hoped they might capture it and we would be able to trade from there. Well, that hope was false, I agree.

I hope you all understand my moves a little better now.

Persia never attacked any of our units in my turns either.. I think because I always kept a cannon and rifle in stacks, and thius they saw the summerian rifles as easier targets

Persia never attacked any of our units in my turns either.. I think because I always kept a cannon and rifle in stacks, that's the great part, they see Sumer as the easier target, lucky for us, but it worked. great turns Gyathaar and exactly what I hoped would happen.

ThERat, don't feel offended by criticism. I understand why you did that, and I still think that was a mistake.

I got Persia to declare against us soon, since it would take us a long time to get more sipahis to do real damage to a STRONG Persia.

I don't get this. It would take us a long time to get sipahi's to fight a strong Persia, so we got into war without being prepared and started to fight an even stronger Persia?

I allied Inca and Sumer in order to weaken Persia and that worked well, well enough for Gyathaar to take out 2 cities, because Persia had burned a lot of units.


Sumeria was already at war with Persia and burning its units.

Sure, Gyathaar got us an army which is huge, but I'd rather say that was great execution with some luck. We had, what, 5 sipahi's to use? They might be enough to take on Hitties, but not the No.1 AI.

The fact is, we rushed into war without enough offense, lost saltpeter and gpt payment from Persia, then sat idle for 27 turns until we could take some action. Now what if we used that 27 turns to build 6 more sipahi's?

We would have done better if we prepared better. We could probably have taken more cities from Persia and even made sure it wouldn't come back.

I don't get this. It would take us a long time to get sipahi's to fight a strong Persia, so we got into war without being prepared and started to fight an even stronger Persia? maybe I have to rephrase

in the beginning of my turns, Persia was beating the crap out of Sumer and making their way towards them. They had plenty of Cavs as well. Even with 11 sipahis, I doubt we could have taken them on.
deleting their units with the help of Inca and Sumer, Sumer was able to slowly work their way into Persia territory and eating more Persian units, thus our 6 sipahis (+3 elite knights) were able to do damage. Maybe I should replay those turns one day to see whether your theory is correct.

and we didn't waste 27 turns in my mind. in 27 turns the AI researched almost zilch. why? due to slow down and lousy governments. Persia was too strong with only Sumer to fight and would have gotten techs much faster as well

Preturn: Move out Army

1280 AD: Get an ROP with the Inca.
Start moving workers to connect Sumerian coal if they are not already doing so.
Move out all Sapahi, Elite knights, Cannon, and some Rifles into Hittite Territory.

IBT: Sumeria replaces the town that Persia owned.

1285 AD: Attack Sulfer town with the Army.

IBT: We should build Mil Trad and Heroic Epic.

1290 AD: Army goes onto sulfer Mountain to Heal

1295 AD: Bombard Tarsus with our Cannon. Attack with our Sapahi and one Elite knight. Raze Tarsus for no losses. Kill a 1 hp Cav with an Elite Knight.

IBT: Persia and Sumeria sign a peace deal.

1300 AD: Healing. There is a single worker on the Coal.

1305 AD: Saltpeter City Razed by Army. We get 4 workers. The saltpeter is also in Hattusha's radius as well so wee need get that one too. We get RP and start on Sci Meth.


1310 AD: The embargo ended but the Saltpeter is no longer Available.
Tarsus attack force heads for Hattusas.

1315 AD: Hattusas attack force bombards a Rifle and settler on a Hill. Elite Sapahi kills the 1 hp Rifle. We get 2 more workers.

IBT: Persia and Hittites re-sign the trade embargo.

1320 AD: Attack Hattusha.

1325 AD: Heal army.

1330 AD: Sumeria connects their coal! We trade Electricity to Sumeria for Coal, Wines, Industrialization, 360 gold and 54 gpt, World Map, and Free Artistry (because I can).

Bombardment on Hattusas doesn't go well. We don't attack.

1335 AD: Again Bombardment doesn't go well. Army is Healing.

1340 AD: Army attacks and Razes Hattusha Grr. Saltpeter is in Incan lands now.
Bombardment on Hattusas goes poorly.

1345 AD: Bombardment is Mediocre. Army kills Rifles which should improve our chances of doing damage next turn.

1350 AD: Our cannon succeed vs Hattusas. We redline all defenders and destroy some Population. Elite units attack and we Raze Hattusuas without loss.

I build a furs Colony with a Worker we get from Hattusas

Notes:
The Incan capitol (Corihuayrachina) is keep us from building a Rubber Colony and a Saltpeter Colony. We should destroy them. They have only two cities.

The Hittites have 1 size 3 city left. We should destroy them too and build an Ivory Colony.

After that I think we shoul seal Sumeria away from Persian lands and go for the kill on Persia. We will have Artillery and Infantry so it shouldn't be hard. Then we finally kill Sumeria. (If we do it in that order we may keep our Colonies as Sumeria will have to ship Settlers over.

I feel we can win this game by Conquest.

Science Method in 1 turn. We are building the Mil Academy that can be switched to TOE. I would not take Atomic Theory and Electronics. Instead I would take 2 techs leading to flight and Moterized Transport.

We have an ROP with the Incas. IIRC, we can break this and take no hit provided that we don't have any units in enemy territory. Can anyone confirm or deny this? In other words, I don't think we have to wait the 6 turns for the ROP to run out

Sumeria is already sending settlers to resettle the lands we cleared. I suggest allying with Sumeria vs Persia so Persia will kill the settlers in its lands. Alternatively we could try to close off the choke just North on Incan territory.

Great just as I was about to end I noticed the big stack of workers near our territory. They belatedly start railing. Gyathaar, for idiots like me, could you wake up one worker in a stack of workers at the end of your turn? I have also missed settler fortified settler stacks to. You don't need to wake them all. Just one. Apologies to the team for not having our lands railed. I should have spotted them. I was looking above our city not below. :rolleyes:

I didn't MM after building some rails
http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads9/AG13_AD1350.JPG

The short form of my suggested game plan is

1) Declare war on the Incans ASAP.
2) Destroy their Capitol and build colonies on the Saltpeter, Coal, and Rubber.
3) Destroy the Hittite last city and Incans last city. Grab the Ivory and silks.
4) Prepare for war with Persia.
5) Attack Persia with help from Sumeria (this will hopefully kill Sumerian settlers in their lands and slow Sumeria from ruining our colonies).
6) Hold the choke North of the Incan lands so we only need to deal with boat landings.
7) Probably switch sides after 20 turns.

Definitely agree on taking out Inca, and then turn to Persia. Sumeria has no saltpeter, so it will be dealt with later with ease (with a pretty narrow front).

I would break the RoP.

On ToE: I don't think we ever need that. We'd still research 3 full techs to get tanks, and I doubt we'll ever need that. I'd rather have 7 more sipahi's (and if we shut off research we could rush units like mad), but that's just me.

Also, I definitely would consider mobolizing and going full speed on conquest.

The Mil Acad is probably worthwhile. We could complete that. Making our army stronger vs rifles would definitely help. I think it would add +2 attack strength to our army (and +1 defense)

On the TOE, You may be right. I am not sure I want the AI to get it though. If they have flight and we don't it is harder.

I think we will be strong enough to hurt Persia quickly so going for the Mil Acad seems reasonable to me. It is only if our attack fails or is very hard would I regret not building TOE.

Another great turn :)

I want to discuss a couple of things as well:
-We have Scientific Method next turn. We still want Sanitation and Espionage (don't we?). I would switch to ToE next turn, ready in 12 and maybe faster (when we railroad our lands). And stop research (forever?). Can be discussed though.
-We can break the ROP without any problems, as long as we don't have military in Incan lands.
-I would like to see us taking out that Incan city now. The Hittites are at war with Persia and Sumeria. They shouldn't be able to survive.
-I then would turn on Persia, with the help of Sumeria. It might be best if we start from the west and let Sumeria go after Persia through the centre, close to our capital (EDIT: city :p ). This should be most damaging for both and we don't want to see Sumeria grow peacefully very fast.
-Regarding mobilization: we also still want a factory and coal plant. Then we can mobilize.
-I definately like to win this by conquest with space as a back-up win.
-Lux tax can go to 0%!!
-EDIT: Why didn't we build a factory (and coal plant) before Military Acadamy???

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (on deck)
Microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley (just played)
LKendter (up)

-We have Scientific Method next turn. We still want Sanitation and Espionage (don't we?). I would switch to ToE next turn, ready in 12 and maybe faster (when we railroad our lands). And stop research (forever?). Can be discussed though.

Do we have industrialization? If not, we need that tech. (if yes, build it before ToE) Espionage has no use - what tech we are going to steal? We are the tech leader. I see us need Industrializaiton and probably Sanitation.

Do we have industrialization? If not, we need that tech. Espionage has no use - what tech we are going to steal? We are the tech leader. I see us need Industrializaiton and probably Sanitation.

We have industrialization! We should have built factory/coal plant imvho...

Great just as I was about to end I noticed the big stack of workers near our territory. They belatedly start railing. Gyathaar, for idiots like me, could you wake up one worker in a stack of workers at the end of your turn? I have also missed settler fortified settler stacks to. You don't need to wake them all. Just one.
Oops.. sorry about that, I should have mentioned i fortified the workers there in writeup too :)

this going very well, agree with all the plans and taking out cities from the west.
we can channel Sumer units the way we want it. if they are weaker than Persia, open mountains. if they are stronger, let them use flat land only. I like this game because we more or less steered the AI into wars.

maybe we get a leader to rush those improvements :rolleyes:

maybe we get a leader to rush those improvements :rolleyes:

Forgot about that! Good remark ;)

We didn't have industrialization before we started the Mil Acad as a pre-build for TOE.

Changing it to a factory (not sure what our shields are at) could be done. It was a another option. I just wanted to be sure we got TOE.

ROSTER (15 turns in peace time, 10 turns when at war):
Aggie (on deck)
Microbe
ThERat
Gyathaar
Greebley
LKendter (currently playing)

Had a quick look at save..
We can make more shields per turn by moving a round citizens a bit.. its currently working high commerce tiles

Persia still dont have rubber connected... its sitting between the old dutch cities they captured ages ago.. but since they are fascist they still havent been able to build culture in those cities :D

Because of this it would be relatively safe to trade replacable parts to persia for the corporation so we can build a stock exchange

Edit: Nevermind.. they have rubber on one of their islands

I took a look at the game and recent post and I am unsure of the game plan.

Are we planing for the standard ToE grab of AT / Electronics, or try to get closer to tanks. I can't play any turns as I would trade RP to some to get Corporation to free up better techs for the ToE game. Please voice your opinion and I will play tomorrow...

I still lean toward AT / Electronics.

The primary advantages of Atomic and Electronics is trading, denying Hover, and getting a pollution free powerplant.

Alternatively we could trade for Corp and get Refining and Steal. That makes us only 2 techs from Flight or 3 techs from Tanks. So the question is whether we think we need these or will the game be all but over by the time we research 3 (or 2) more techs.

The other issue is we may want to turn off Research for a while to upgrade our Cannon, Knights, and Rifles.

Thinking it through, I do want to upgrade our units, so maybe getting At Theory and Electonics is better. We can then trade At theory for Corp rather than RP which I don't like to do. We can turn of research and use or two techs for trading.

I think I do want to go for TOE so we have trading power without trading away RP.

in my opinion, AT and electronic do not benefit us much. we can get a coal plant with a leader.
we should either go for sanitation or tanks. sanitation will help boost our city. tanks of course will help a lot too.

The game plan? Well, most important to me is that we:

1-Get saltpeter (razing the Inca capital seems the way to go there, EDIT: it will also give us rubber)
2-Declare on Persia and hurt them (I like the help of Sumeria, they can't/shouldn't grow peacefully).
3-Ensure that one way or the other both Sumeria and Persia won't be able to take a breath until the end of the game, when we win by conquest!

The way I would go:
-Selling Replaceable Parts will NOT make this road easier. I hate that idea. We'd fight infantry too early with our few Sipahi.
-I would want to max out our production at some point, which we can do with Sanitation, Factory and Coal Plant.
-After maxing out production I can see us building Sipahi/Infantry/Artillery only. Maybe only interupted by Stock Exchange.
- I don't seee a need to research after getting ourselves ToE. I would choose Sanitation and Atomic Theory. Sanitation is needed, AT can be sold.
- We can get cheap techs in peacedeals. I'm sure Persia and Sumeria will help us advance!
- Pillage Persia. When moving our SoD through their lands, use our Sipahi(army) to cripple them.
- We can probably win this with artillery/Sipahi. Just look at our last 25 turns.

But to me the most important to me is that we don't allow Persia and Sumeria some rest. We have a Sipahi army, which won't be attacked when fully healed and is the best unit to walk this earth. Also: fully healed elite infantries are safe vs the AI as well (unless -maybe- vs elite cav)!

Sanitation is a very cheap tech. I would rather the AI research it and we trade for it than taking it our ourselves with TOE.

It sounds like we all agree on the main game plan. Inca followed by Persia almost immediately. Hittites can be destroyed on the way.

I don't think we need to pillage Persia. I would rather get our Cannon upgraded and destroy the cities rather than just pillaging.