deo
Apr 25, 2005, 07:24 AM
Now what's the better game? With which game do you have more pleasure?
For me C3C is still the best!
For me C3C is still the best!
|
View Full Version : Rome: Total War v.s. Civilization 3: Conquests! deo Apr 25, 2005, 07:24 AM Now what's the better game? With which game do you have more pleasure? For me C3C is still the best! classical_hero Apr 25, 2005, 09:55 AM This is my answer to that question. [c3c] Dell19 Apr 25, 2005, 11:01 AM You are posting it on a Civ site... ForbiddenPalace May 04, 2005, 05:22 PM I have tried out the demo for Rome and feels it is terrible. I do not know how on earth GameSpot gives this game 9.1. CivGeneral May 04, 2005, 09:47 PM C3C for me, I just like having modern armies. ShowMeTheMoney May 05, 2005, 01:06 AM Well, this is the civfanatics site after all.. I'll have to say it's C3C. I like the Total War games, but RTW is on my list of some of the most disappointing games of recent years. It was great the first few weeks, but after that it just felt really flat. Lord Sankra May 05, 2005, 03:01 AM I voted for civ. But, Rome is a totally different game if you use the Total Realism mod. It adds to the game in almost all areas, and it's the single reason i still play Rome from time to time. If interested, you can get it here: Rome Total Realism (http://www.rometotalrealism.com/) Princeps May 05, 2005, 03:18 AM I do like Rome: total war much, but i like Civ more... So, I play them both... Grohan May 05, 2005, 04:10 AM I voted for Civ because my computer doen't run Rome well :cry: WickedSmurf May 05, 2005, 04:26 AM Right now, I prefer R:TW. Harbringer May 05, 2005, 05:37 PM civ became to much of a routine for me, RTW hee. Azale May 05, 2005, 06:46 PM Civ, I cant FRIGGIN RUN RTW on my comp. So screw em, lol B-52 May 07, 2005, 01:59 PM Civ. Though surely the poll is a little biased? =/ LLXerxes May 13, 2005, 06:21 PM They're both cool, but C3C is better :cool: \ homeyg May 13, 2005, 07:26 PM I like C3C better. Why? I spent a total of $200 dollars to get RTW working and it turns out it is not that good and the graphics blow. C3C I by for $30 bucks or whatever it cost, and had hours of enjoyment. RTW I had hours of aggravation trying to get the game working and installing a new graphics card for a game I see isn't really that good once I could play it. Volstag May 23, 2005, 04:52 PM For now definitely Civ III. R:TW is soooo close to being a winner, but it's plagued by numerous bugs and weird AI. The save/load bug absolutely has to get squashed. In a way, R:TW reminded me of DungeonSiege -- incredible engine, great ideas... flawed execution. Here's hoping the $35 patch... er, expansion, rectifies many of R:TW's shortcomings, 'cause I desperately want to enjoy the game more. Stuie May 25, 2005, 08:48 AM I actually like RTW better (after it is properly modded of course). Marx May 26, 2005, 05:03 PM Rome Total War is fun, but after a couple of hours/days it becomes a little bit annoying. Civilization has such a better 'replay' Thunderfall May 26, 2005, 05:19 PM I played RTW for a while, but somehow couldn't really get into it like Civ. Lozzy_Ozzy Jun 25, 2005, 03:41 PM I voted R:TW, but I think Civ 3 has more lasting enjoyment in it. So basically I voted wrong :crazyeye:. North King Jun 26, 2005, 12:28 AM In all honesty they really messed up on RTW... I actually enjoy playing Shogun and Medieval more than Rome. Dell19 Jun 26, 2005, 05:07 AM I never really got into RTW because it seemed to easy and unlocking the different nations just took too much time when all you are doing is waiting for the next leader and then building a 1k army and then taking over the next province. The battles were cool though even if they were easy in general. NintendoNut Jun 28, 2005, 11:57 AM I don't have C3C, but I still voted for it because PTW kicks RTW's butt. Bungus Apr 06, 2006, 12:24 AM Wow, I'm surprise at everyone voting Civ3. Rtw is a good game with some big flaws, but then again, Civ3 has HUGE flaws. I wouldn't even play it before conquests. Someone mentioned the Rome Total Realism mod. My friend had it, I played it a bit, and over all I've come to the conclusion that (like so many Civ mods) it's better than regular RTW. The biggest problem with RTW was the poor AI. Not that Civ 3 or even 4 has great AI, but I think sprawling real-time battles showed its holes. Maybe the next installment will feature some better AI generals. Probably not though. Its a demographic thing, and most people don't notice. Swiss Bezerker Apr 06, 2006, 06:15 AM A tie. They are both outstanding games Kan' Sharuminar Apr 06, 2006, 06:36 AM I voted RTW, as I never really liked Civ3 that much. Civ2 or 4 vs. Rome though, that would be a tough choice.. Aramazd Apr 08, 2006, 11:29 AM C3C, but if it was R: TW vs. Civ4 I would say R: TW Dreadnought Apr 09, 2006, 10:15 AM Rome is better. I love great graphics and huge battles. leonel Apr 09, 2006, 01:52 PM If only they had Rome: Total War battles in Civ games. Then it'd be awesome. Move a stack of units around, etc etc. And there would be the option of doing it strategically or automatically. Ukas Apr 11, 2006, 06:57 AM Rome is definitely better as a game. Never have I had so intense experiments playing civ, which only offers bit longer playability. diablodelmar Apr 11, 2006, 12:27 PM Rome tw all the way! I never played rome at the time conquests was out but now I have it. Civ 3 did not age very well, where as Rome's graphics engine is still one of the best out there. cegman Apr 14, 2006, 10:57 AM Medieval: TW beats Civ but Rome just feel flat so I voted for civ. Truronian Apr 18, 2006, 04:32 AM I think that RTW was more impressive and enjoyable in the time that I played it, but C3C lasted much longer before I got bored of it. Therefore I'd say C3C Oruc Apr 23, 2006, 11:04 AM Medieval:total war beats Rome and Civ3 Cheezy the Wiz Apr 23, 2006, 12:37 PM I agree Medieval Total War owns Rome, but CIV III offers so many options for modding and whatnot. Sashie VII Apr 25, 2006, 10:32 AM I agree Medieval Total War owns Rome, but CIV III offers so many options for modding and whatnot. Civ is OT :scan: I'll agree I miss MTW still, even with the graphics and other cool things RTW are. Civfan333 Dec 31, 2007, 05:16 PM C3C RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D :D :D :D You're posting on a CivFANATICS website.:rolleyes: duckmanbro Dec 31, 2007, 06:43 PM C3C RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D :D :D :D You're posting on a CivFANATICS website.:rolleyes: Uh huh, even though it's the Total War forum :crazyeye: Heh, either way they both have their merits, where Total War you have to battle to win (basically), but in Civ, there are so many more options to go about dominating. Traitorfish Jan 01, 2008, 06:35 PM Have to say Civ3C. Much as I love Total War, the lifespan on C3C was just phenomenal... West 36 Jan 02, 2008, 02:08 AM Have to say Civ3C. Much as I love Total War, the lifespan on C3C was just phenomenal... IS phenomenal, my friend, is. Civ 3 has yet to die, to me anyway. Maybe if Civ 5 is better, but knowing the industry, it will suck. Total War vs Civ, I'm stuck. TW has the great graphics and battles, and is more in depth, but limited as far as the big picture is concerned; one era, limited area, you can't build cities, etc. Civ covers all history, has more than one map, can be modded by even me, and you can make you empire as you want it. Combining the two would be awesome but time-consuming. So that said, IDK. I think I've played more civ than TW though. Maniacal Jan 02, 2008, 02:19 AM Even though I own Civ3 and the two expansions, I doubt I'll ever install them. I rarely play Civ anymore. As such RTW wins. |
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.