View Full Version : am i the only one who hates ron?!


Vietcong
Jun 19, 2005, 09:56 PM
i cant stand it!!!!
my i have mgs overran and killed by as few as 2 knights!! wtf!? and mg has a Disatvantage agisnt guys on hourse?!?!!

grenadears, guys with freaking muskets destroy my panzers!!!
and its another one of thouse games whear heavey troops beat calvery, calvery beats meadeum, meadeaum beats light, light beads heavy!

i hate that!! and uus SUCK!! thear exacly the same as any other swords man but with a 5% bounus agisnt other heavey infanty.... the uus comletly suck....

Vietcong
Jun 19, 2005, 09:59 PM
oooo, and one of ther freaking watch towers shot my fighter down with a freaking AROW!!!!!!!!!!!! AN AROW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE HELL IS THAT!! THATS WORSE BS THEN MY TANK BEING BEATEN BY A FREAKING SPEAR MAN IN CIV!!!!

Splime
Jun 20, 2005, 10:40 AM
Have you patched the game? Machine guns are weak against tanks, and therefore horses. The arrow should damage you, but not take you down after a lot of shots (unless you're using biplanes, then it makes sense to be taken down).

Vietcong
Jun 25, 2005, 06:53 PM
no it dosent!!! u choldnt even hit a plane with a freaking araow, and if u happend to it wholdnt even pirce it or take it down!! ITS SO GAY!!!

yea mgs are eak agisnt tanks, but y shold thay be weak agisn hourses!

dojoboy
Jun 26, 2005, 07:27 AM
I rather enjoy RoN, but I understand your frustration.

LLXerxes
Jun 28, 2005, 07:18 PM
Chill out! This is a fun game. Every game has it's bugs, some games have alot of bugs. How about you not play RON and play... whatever fun Gothic Muslim games you like...

Fox Mccloud
Jul 03, 2005, 07:14 PM
Wth are mg's? Just write it out so I can understand, don't be lazy. Anyway, it never happened to me, buy I bought the Gold Edition. :p

Grohan
Jul 04, 2005, 02:55 AM
@Fox Mccloud: MG= Machinegun

Flintlock
Jul 04, 2005, 10:01 AM
u choldnt even hit a plane with a freaking araow, and if u happend to it wholdnt even pirce it or take it down!!I've always thought of that as more of a balance thing, so you don't easily bomb everyone into oblivion as soon as you reach aircraft.

Vietcong
Jul 04, 2005, 10:36 AM
but thear arows!! what thay shold have is for civs that are behind in teck able to buy guns or modren troops like merchanys from say a budlign named "black market" that whold be a way to balance the game out with out haveing bomers blown to crap with arows!!

dojoboy
Jul 04, 2005, 02:01 PM
but thear arows!! what thay shold have is for civs that are behind in teck able to buy guns or modren troops like merchanys from say a budlign named "black market" that whold be a way to balance the game out with out haveing bomers blown to crap with arows!!

You're expecting something that the game was never designed to for. As far as bi-planes go, they are very vulnerable to ground fire historically. In WWI, many pilots were shot by rifles because bi-planes were slow and made of fabric or soft wood. Being shot by an arrow is not much of a stretch. And, if you figure that 100 arrows are shot at a low flying bi-plane, one is bound to hit a critical spot.

Vietcong
Jul 04, 2005, 02:49 PM
but tis one aro, not hundred, and it wasnt a bi plane but a ww2 eara bomber

Fox Mccloud
Jul 04, 2005, 09:13 PM
but thear arows!! what thay shold have is for civs that are behind in teck able to buy guns or modren troops like merchanys from say a budlign named "black market" that whold be a way to balance the game out with out haveing bomers blown to crap with arows!!

That is a good Idea! I'm sure you could make that somehow using scripts, but I dunno how.

PS: Learn to spell. :p

Vietcong
Jul 04, 2005, 09:43 PM
That is a good Idea! I'm sure you could make that somehow using scripts, but I dunno how.

PS: Learn to spell. :p



read my signature, im autistic...

Karaman
Jul 10, 2005, 09:36 AM
I dont like the game either :)
It is pathetic :)

frekk
Sep 13, 2005, 02:31 AM
I don't know if it's pathetic, but it certainly doesn't have much replay value. Played the campaign once, it was fun, but I couldn't really get interested in playing it again after that ... it just seemed it would be more of the same.

Concona
Sep 28, 2005, 06:22 AM
you are a freak

Dreadnought
Sep 28, 2005, 02:16 PM
no it dosent!!! u choldnt even hit a plane with a freaking araow, and if u happend to it wholdnt even pirce it or take it down!! ITS SO GAY!!!

yea mgs are eak agisnt tanks, but y shold thay be weak agisn hourses!

MGs are weak against horses because the tanks and horsemen are 'classified' together. So you either have both tanks/horses good against MGS or MGS good against both tanks/horses

Vietcong
Oct 06, 2005, 09:26 PM
exacly, y not clasifie them difrently? that whold be much beater!

Captain2
Oct 10, 2005, 09:58 AM
exacly, y not clasifie them difrently? that whold be much beater!
because that would be a ****load of work, so instead of bad mouthing a great historical game, just put it back in the corner and leave it alone. I will be over to rescue it shortly :p lol

Vietcong
Oct 10, 2005, 11:48 AM
historical???? it has a paper, rock blah blah system.. it sucks...

a singel calvery unit kills my mg, a guy with a musket destroys my tank, a damn AROW SHOTS DOWN MYA BOMBER!! AN AROW A FREAKING AAAAARRRROOOOOOOOOWWW

Fox Mccloud
Oct 10, 2005, 03:08 PM
historical???? it has a paper, rock blah blah system.. it sucks...

a singel calvery unit kills my mg, a guy with a musket destroys my tank, a damn AROW SHOTS DOWN MYA BOMER!! AN AROW A FREAKING AAAAARRRROOOOOOOOOWWW

BY DA FREAKING TP EXPENTON PAK, TEN NO MOR CALVERY KILL MGZ, AND THEN NO MORE ANTIARCRAF AAAAAAAAARRRROOOOOOWWWW 4 U!!!!!!11111 :rolleyes: :shakehead :p

Mrdie
Oct 10, 2005, 03:44 PM
BY DA FREAKING TP EXPENTON PAK, TEN NO MOR CALVERY KILL MGZ, AND THEN NO MORE ANTIARCRAF AAAAAAAAARRRROOOOOOWWWW 4 U!!!!!!11111 :rolleyes: :shakehead :p
HA HA!

:D

But yeah, shut up if you don't like the game, Vietcong.

jehangir
Oct 28, 2005, 04:15 AM
I think there are a few more nations that should be added : like u need something in Australia

Also NOTHING EVER MISSES which is a bit disturbing ... it kinda takes away the point of having those ranged cav fire on the move!

Red Door
Nov 04, 2005, 03:14 PM
I dont hate the game, but I dont love it. A great game when you feel like killing something.

Tank_Guy#3
Nov 25, 2005, 03:48 PM
I rather enjoy RoN, but I understand your frustration.

I would have to agree with this.

Dudy80
Feb 04, 2006, 09:03 AM
I like your sig vietcong, right out of the book 1984 ( :

KingCruz
Feb 05, 2006, 04:56 PM
I don't play this game. But if your gonna be a critic. Be a constructive critic...
:p

Fox Mccloud
Feb 06, 2006, 04:27 PM
I think there are a few more nations that should be added : like u need something in Australia

Austrailia?

They should have the Arabs first. How can you not have the Arabs in?

GlobalOppressor
Mar 08, 2006, 11:24 PM
Ive seen stuff miss in RoN, its just not ranged cavalry- try Archers or Fire Lances.

BTW, I think that RoN is probably one of the best RTSs ever made, though the Expansion does add a lot more intricacies to it, and therefore makes it a far more interesting game.

Shaunold
Jul 22, 2006, 04:04 AM
Its a gobotastic game!:eek:

Winner372
Sep 04, 2006, 08:35 AM
ok, about your "arrow" incident.

1. Your bomber had low hp
2. if it was a lookout, lookouts are close to SAM installations, therefore it kills the bomber
3. yer ****ed up :P

dimaliok
Sep 12, 2006, 08:00 AM
well get a stelth bomer since only fitghter air craft can kill it

moksheebs
Oct 19, 2010, 01:51 PM
yes vietcong you're the only hater
now go drink your napalm