spycatcher34
Dec 18, 2001, 06:30 PM
Ok we got one phalnax guarding no enemies in site. Time for soem infastructure?
Also please give your veiws on resource allotment as we are still at the point were there is a choice. Wheat or buffalo? Each has pros and cons as disscused in other threads.
TheDuckOfFlanders
Dec 18, 2001, 07:11 PM
I go for settler.No need to build infrastructure in this city at this state.We need to be expansive for the moment.We have more unit's than we can support at this moment.So there's no need for unit building neither.
knowltok
Dec 19, 2001, 07:47 AM
Settler! We have to grow quickly. We'll need another Phalanx when we get to monarchy and can support it for free.
ACM
Dec 19, 2001, 03:15 PM
Settler. Let's expand agressively just like the AI in Civ3.
Alcibiaties of Athenae
Dec 20, 2001, 01:32 PM
Didn't we agree on building only settlers in the capital till we had at least five cities?
It seems we are voting on things that were decided awhile back, aern't we?
Also, since we are on an island, the tech path after Mon and Trade must be altered to include mapmaking.
spycatcher34
Dec 20, 2001, 03:11 PM
Originally posted by Alcibiaties of Athenae
Didn't we agree on building only settlers in the capital till we had at least five cities?
It seems we are voting on things that were decided awhile back, aern't we?
Oopps. Ohwell. We still need to DECIDE on resource allotment!
Also, since we are on an island, the tech path after Mon and Trade must be altered to include mapmaking.
Dont come complaining around here go talk to the tehcie people about that.:p
Apollo
Dec 20, 2001, 03:33 PM
Originally posted by spycatcher34
Oopps. Ohwell. We still need to DECIDE on resource allotment!
Keep it on the wheat. As it is, with the wheat giving more food and less production than the buffalo, we will produce a settler before we grow to the next level.