View Full Version : Is there any rome for role playing?


classical_hero
Aug 14, 2005, 07:16 AM
This subject has been brought up by some members of my team. We were wondering what the other team thought about the idea.

Provolution
Aug 14, 2005, 07:46 AM
When and if we meet, there are ample opportunities to roleplay. Being in character, I cannot play a role to someone I never met.

fe3333au
Aug 15, 2005, 01:29 AM
i guess that is a yes then ;)

WarDance
Aug 16, 2005, 07:05 PM
I think that some role play would add some nice color to the game. I think doing it publicly in the forums though will have to wait until everyone "knows" each other of course.

Provolution
Aug 18, 2005, 08:57 AM
Rome for Roleplaying, TNT is Persia, not Rome. But we will call ourselves Irôn, for that purpose. The Team will always be TNT, but the nation will be Irôn.
I suggest Iroquois will be Iroq (at least we will refer to them that way), whereas Celts and Greeks, will be referred to as Dar Al Harb and Dar Al Gôl respectively, for roleplaying purposes.

Pentium
Aug 29, 2005, 01:43 PM
Don't you think the other teams should have the right to choose their own names?

Just don't make Iroquois Iraq :D

Daghdha
Aug 30, 2005, 01:31 AM
I suggest:
Celts-Feadaíl Caora
Iros-BlasdaToll
Greeks-Sleagh Glas
Persia-Dian Luch

Provolution
Aug 30, 2005, 04:47 AM
Don't you think the other teams should have the right to choose their own names?

Just don't make Iroquois Iraq :D


It is Iroq, not Iraq, no worries :) What is wrong with Iraq then, it is like any other country. And possibly, Iroq, the Iroqi people and Iroqi insurgents could be terms we use. But by all means, nations should refer to themselves as they wish.

fe3333au
Aug 30, 2005, 04:14 PM
But by all means, nations should refer to themselves as they wish.
and the rivals as they wish as well :p

Provolution
Aug 30, 2005, 04:36 PM
and the rivals as they wish as well

But of Course :)