The Judge Advocate is part of the Judicial Branch along with the Chief Justice and Public Defender, and is tasked with upholding, clarifying and reviewing all changes to the Constitution and its supporting laws through Judicial Reviews, and upholding the rights of all citizens through Investigations. The Judiciary will carry out all its tasks in a fair, impartial, public and speedy manner.

The Judge Advocate will act as the prosecution to an accused citizen

Please submit nominations for the Judge Advocate in this thread and Accept or Decline any nominations you may receive. Self nominations are allowed. Citizens may only run for one elected position.

Nominations will close and elections open 00:00 GMT on the 28 August (that’s 8pm EDT 27 August).

I nomiante Strider.

I nominate black hole

I nominate black hole
Thank-You, I accept

I'll accept my nomination. Doing this for several reasons:

1) I'm fairly unhappy with several rulings made by the Judiciary this term. The laws of common sense seems to be often thrown away, to be replaced with avaricious reasoning.

2) I need to get back into the game, I've had some health issues the pass couple of weeks and I've had trouble getting caught up. This will hopefully give me more motivation to get caught up, and back into the game.

3) The Judiciary has always been a large black spot in our constitutions. It has remained, because it is the most efficient way to deal with this part of the democracy game. I plan on using my term inside of the Judiciary to aid myself in coming up with a alternative, or possible modifications that will allow the Judiciary to work just as efficiently (if not more), but also allow democracy to reign to it's fullest.

Anyway, this will make things more interesting this game. The only parts that have been remotely fun are the newspapers. Everything else is just a copy of past games.

I'll accept my nomination. Doing this for several reasons:

1) I'm fairly unhappy with several rulings made by the Judiciary this term. The laws of common sense seems to be often thrown away, to be replaced with avaricious reasoning.

2) I need to get back into the game, I've had some health issues the pass couple of weeks and I've had trouble getting caught up. This will hopefully give me more motivation to get caught up, and back into the game.

3) The Judiciary has always been a large black spot in our constitutions. It has remained, because it is the most efficient way to deal with this part of the democracy game. I plan on using my term inside of the Judiciary to aid myself in coming up with a alternative, or possible modifications that will allow the Judiciary to work just as efficiently (if not more), but also allow democracy to reign to it's fullest.

Anyway, this will make things more interesting this game. The only parts that have been remotely fun are the newspapers. Everything else is just a copy of past games.
any particular rulings you did not like?

This Nomination Thread is now closed for nominations. Please continue any debates/discussions in the Election Thread

Thank You