View Full Version : Paganism


Phyr_Negator
Aug 27, 2005, 01:57 PM
Question: I am a big fan of all of your games. I have been playing Civilization since the first one was released and I can not wait for Civilization IV. I do have a question about Civilization IV as it relates to religion. Can your government have no state religion? If so can they influence border nations with their secular beliefs?
Sid: Hello Orie! Yes, the default is Paganism, which means there is no organized religion. At the other end of the spectrum is Free Religion and that offers tolerance of all religions. It's not possible to spread no religion where there is already religion. It's a play mechanic, but I am pretty sure it holds up that way in history as well.
Right now relating to news' info paganism is like despotism as I understand. That means it's just religion that should be changed to another as fast as possible and can't contest with other standart rels like Chr/jud/isl/other.
I don't think that's correct. Aztecs, Maya, Mongols, early Russia and Scandinavia was pagan and they were formidable powers(mentioned few of caurse). Wouldn't it be better choise to implement two forms of Paganism - Early Paganism- that will play despotism and "unorganized religion" role as start rel and Late Paganism - witch should be equal in bonuses/penalties with other religions. I can say more - Paganism can be divided to Agressiva and Defensive. Aztec paganism was surely agressive, but Russian and Scandinavian paganism CAN be called defensive as well - it wasn't spreading by missionaries and after conuests defeated nations rarely were allowed in conquerors' religion so it can be reshaped in assimilation penalty. But people was not WORSHIP Pagan Gods - they were...cooperating will be suitable word. So it can provide vulnerability to foreign religions influense bonus and military bonuses - pagans will rather die fighting but never surrender - cuz if they die as slave they will be slave at their haven!(got no info about Aztec/Maya beliefs - that's related to Scan/Rus rel). I hope Sid will change his position about paganism.

RCL
Aug 27, 2005, 02:01 PM
What about adding Ateism? :) It was (is) very much like state religion and can be also spread very well.

MrMahk
Aug 27, 2005, 02:07 PM
yeah, i agree with adding atheism

I am the Future
Aug 27, 2005, 04:41 PM
athiesm isnt a religion. It is the absence of one. No country has gone out and said "THERE IS NO RELIGION"

and dont even say comunist russia and china :cool:

Dr. Salazar
Aug 27, 2005, 10:21 PM
Why exactly, shouldn't we? In Either case, Albania under Enver Hoxha.

Crayton
Aug 28, 2005, 03:35 PM
To address the original topic: Hinduism is the game's representation of "Late Paganism". It would be foolish to add the Norse, Greek, Egyptian, Hindu, Aztec, and Roman Pantheons so game designers put the default religion as "Paganism" and put the largest surviving polytheistic religion "Hinduism" in the game.

I guess, according to game-designers the Aztecs would be "Pagan" until the arrival of the Spanish when many became "Christian"; after-all, none of the 7 world religions are based in the Americas.

I can't think of any "Pagan" religions that are not just continuations of pre-historic religion. I do know that such religions are common in the South Pacific, parts of the near-Arctic, and Southern Africa.

Hinduism is unique therefore because it was never "founded" nor had a great prophet that taught the people. On the other hand, I'm rather ignorant when it comes to Hinduism.

EDIT: Atheism needn't be in the game because there is already a civic-option that removes state-religion. That would be equatable to today's Atheistic Communisms and today's Secular Democracies.

Israelite9191
Aug 28, 2005, 04:48 PM
Crayton- Hate to tell you this, but Vodun (also called Voodoo) is a polytheistic religion that is a continuation (it is not a recent Neo-Pagan) of ancient African beliefs. It is the predominent religion in Togo, Benin, and Haiti (although in Haiti most people follow Vodun and Catholicism simultaniously, but Vodun is still more popular). Also, what about Shinto? While most people who practice Shinto are also Budhist, they are generally Shinto first, Budhist second. I think the polytheistic religions should be Paganism (mabey divide it by culture group or something, but it doesn't really matter), Hinduism, Vodun, Shinto, and Neo-Paganism (as a modern religion, to keep religion as a major factor on to the late game).

EDIT: I forgot to mention that Vodun alsso has large amounts of followers in Louisiana, the Dominican Republic, most of West Africa, Florida, Chicago, New York, Paris, and Montreal.

Dr. Salazar
Aug 28, 2005, 07:26 PM
Vodun still lags behind, not even making the top 22nd religion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Present_day_religious_adherence_and_trend s

Crayton
Aug 31, 2005, 10:10 PM
We shouldn't badger about size of religious following now.

Okay; Shinto, Voodoo, and Hinduism are all "pagan" religions that survived to today.
My point was that to choose the 7 major religions (or 8 if you wanted one added) Hinduism superceded/represents these 3 because it is the largest.

Neo-Paganism? I'm not all to familiar with this. I've heard of Wiccan, but the best I could call this is a cult or heresy of Christianity. I've heard of the Muslim parts of the world, the Hindu parts of the world, but not the Neo-Pagan parts of the World.
Enlighten me please.

jwijn
Aug 31, 2005, 10:37 PM
Well, I gave it a shot, but one man arguing against four gets tiring after a while (and I also have work to do :( ) But this is basically the same as this thread (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=127138) in cIV General Discussion

Crayton
Aug 31, 2005, 10:51 PM
True. Naming the thread: "No Religion" Option
is sure to draw people "With Religion".

I don't know what you wanted.
"Paganism" is neither of the big 7 religions.
"No State Religion" negates any religion's effects on government.
"No Religion" is, frankly, not a religion.

To address the first post: Pagan religion gets military bonuses???
Most religions had a strong military component, doubly so when engaged with heathen forces. The Muslims in Jerusalem didn't just lay down when the Christian Crusaders came, they also would die before being captured by the Europeans.
On the other hand, this is just an attribute of religion, so, I guess I made a mute point.

jwijn
Aug 31, 2005, 10:56 PM
Crayton,

The whole idea of including atheism (or even no religion) in the same game mechanics as the other 7 is to be able to see the spread of atheism in the same way that one could watch the spread of christianity or judaism. Oh well, I'll just mod it in then (but perhaps one of you kind CFCers could create some sort of Voltaire/scholar-looking unit as my missionary?)

Desertsnow
Sep 01, 2005, 09:02 PM
Hinduism is a specific form of late paganism, just as the Abrahamic faiths are specific forms of monotheism (also called Desert Monotheism). I'm with Phyr on this issue, more or less.

Pounder
Sep 01, 2005, 09:30 PM
I am not looking for the top 7 seven religions as they are today. I am looking for alternate histories to take place in the game.

The religions they choose are too close to each other. Judaism, Christianity and Muslim all have the same roots.

I would love to see Druidism become the dominant religion in a game or some other earth/universe/sun type worship.

There has to be better base choices. Hopefully there will be an option to shut religion off as I fear that it will become too dominant a feature in the game.

MattII
Sep 02, 2005, 06:29 AM
I red in National Geographic that Norse Paganism is still hanging on with its teeth (a few dozen believers at most) in Iceland, and down here in NZ I think a few people still endorse the old Maori Paganism, though I can't be sure. Pounder's right, after all, Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism anyway.

Hrafnkell
Sep 02, 2005, 03:22 PM
Paganism would naturally be the default, but I don't agree with the process that makes all other religions an improvement on the original religions of the various civs. Christianity is not an improvement on paganism or heathenism, it is merely an alternative. We see it as inevitable that Christianity triumphed but that is only because it did. If it had not, we'd be saying right now that it was inevitable that Christianity could never triumph over the other religions. To limit paganism (and by that I mean all tribal belief systems everywhere) to a default setting that has no real value is ridiculous...all those huge temples and expensive statues were not built for nothing. And Christianity owes as much to the Hellenistic belief systems, Zoroastrianism and Mithraism as it does to Judaism, if not more...to include Judaism and exclude the rest is ridiculous.

Come on Firaxis, give the past its due. As for heathens, there are more of us than you might think and they're not limited to Iceland. The Mediterranean pagans are making a comback too. Don't count us out yet.

Hrafnkell
Sep 02, 2005, 03:30 PM
I red in National Geographic that Norse Paganism is still hanging on with its teeth (a few dozen believers at most) in Iceland, and down here in NZ I think a few people still endorse the old Maori Paganism, though I can't be sure. Pounder's right, after all, Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism anyway.

I would not entirely trust National Geographic...for instance, they are wed to the idea of the Mitochondrial Eve despite the many arguments against it (and you'd never know those arguments exist if you only read that magazine), and it should be noted here as well that Asatru is the only legally recognized religion in Iceland besides Protestantism and that Christianity was never more than skin deep in Iceland..."heathen" was never a bad word there.

Corvex
Sep 02, 2005, 04:41 PM
I've heard of the Muslim parts of the world, the Hindu parts of the world, but not the Neo-Pagan parts of the World.
Enlighten me please.

Parts of Northern Canada could probably be called 'neo-pagan.' I use the term loosely, however, since I am referring to primarily to the local natives practicing their ancestral beliefs. Since the rights and ceremonies involved are largely reconstructions (because aboriginal religion was heavily suppressed by the government and the various churches during the mid-twentieth century), these religions may be considered to be 'neo-pagan.'

As for myself, I look forward to modding-in my favourite religion in the entire history of the world: the Pythagorian Number Cult, and then converting the infidels ;)

Bluemofia
Sep 02, 2005, 05:27 PM
I would like the idea of nature worship, as it was a very important religion in early civilizations.

MattII
Sep 09, 2005, 04:56 AM
Nature worship, is that the same as worshipping the earth mother as portrayed in Jean M. Auel's Earth Children series?

Krikkitone
Sep 09, 2005, 11:29 AM
Paganism would naturally be the default, but I don't agree with the process that makes all other religions an improvement on the original religions of the various civs.

Well its an improvment in terms of its non localized nature (although here I agree with you that Judaism..and to some degree Hinduism..fail on that count) They basically make it in due to their current strength or recognizability among the target audience (as well as Judaism having the significant difference from most early pagan religions of asserting the universal superiority of their God)

That is essentially what religion is some non local belief system that ties people together, helping/hurting dimplomacy either internal to the state or between states.

civmod19
Sep 11, 2005, 11:23 AM
These religions are fully customizable? If yes, we can resolve some problem here when we go to mod it.
Only one form of paganism in the game is incorrect. The paganism of the Roman Empire was not the same thing as the early paganism.
Christianism was good to ensure domination over foreign peoples, conquered people, as, for example, the spaniards conquering the aztecs and forcing christianity upon them as a form of cultural domination.
But roman paganism, the Religio Romana of the Republic and the Roman Empire already have this tatic of using religion as a means of cultural domination. The gods of foreign peoples were added to the pantheon as these foreign people were conquered. This was called romanization, and was applied to every aspects of society, not just religion.
In civ3 we have monotheism as a advance to polytheism. This is just emulation from real history, but history can be altered.
And what about mithraism? Various aspects of mithraism were incorporated in christianity, and mithraism is not the same as the early persian paganism.
And what about hellenism? The greeks distinguished themselves from the more primitive barbarians outside of Greece. The term barbarians was coined by them, to designated other people that dont share the more advanced greek culture. The barbarians were the ones with the early paganism, the greeks with the more advanced one.

warpstorm
Sep 11, 2005, 11:54 AM
Religions in Civ4 are just names.

Aussie_Lurker
Sep 11, 2005, 08:33 PM
Well, I personally feel that Paganism and Polytheism-though they can mean the same thing-often are not the same thing. For instance, I feel that Greco-Roman, Ossirian and MesoAmerican polytheism have as MUCH RIGHT to be represented as seperate religions, in the game, as Hinduism does. Sure they might not be around today, but at one point they were the highly organised, Pantheistic faiths of some of the most powerful empires in their region. I might even suggest that Norse Poytheism belongs there for the same reason, though the argument is not nearly as strong. My point is that they are a world away from the unorganised, nature-worshipping pagan religions that flourished in the Late Stone Age to Early Bronze Age-and need to represented as such.
That said, I understand why they went for 7 religions-at least initially-and even why they went for the ones they did (they are, whether you like to admit it or not, the most easily recognisable faiths). I do hold out hope though that, in either an Expansion or Mod, a way will be figured out to add some of these 'lesser known' religions to the game in a way which does not upset gameplay balance.

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.

wolf_brother
Sep 12, 2005, 01:11 AM
I've heard of Wiccan, but the best I could call this is a cult or heresy of Christianity.

I'm insulted. Know what you're talking about before you shoot off your mouth. Ignorant fool.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/witchcra.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicca

Now have a nice day.

And to stay on topic, I agree with warpstorm. Not only are they just names in game context, but also we know that civ4 will be highly modable, so if you want to add or subtract a religion than just do it. I know what I plan to tinker around with them abit as is, and everyone else is thinking the same thing. Give it a month a more universal system will be adopted by the online community.

Phyr_Negator
Sep 12, 2005, 09:06 AM
Custamizable religions? then I'll buy civIV just to see Phyrranity and Negatorism cover Earth in oceans of blood and put N+1 millions of heretic unbeleavers to purifying flames!
P.S.I can even accept loss of population due to daily sacrifices.

Tunch Khan
Sep 12, 2005, 09:14 AM
Shamanism can also be discussed here as there were both nature worshipping and monotheist Shamanist beliefs.