RegentMan
Oct 15, 2005, 10:52 AM
donsig has proposed the following amendment to rule 2.4.
Here's the original rule:
2.4 - Misleading through Renaming
Description: No team or individual is permitted to rename a unit or city with the intent of misleading or confusing opponents.
Definition: Cities can be renamed to names of tech or sums of gold or anything else in an effort to not trade what that opponent agreed to. Units can be renamed to other units and appear to be something else entirely.
Purpose: To prevent the misleading or confusion of another team through malicious use of in-game features.
Verdict: Using this 'feature' or any other feature or exploit that allows misleading or confusing another team is a violation of this rule.
Punishment Level: Once – Red (5-Expulsion and forfeiture of double what was not legally traded)
Here's the proposed amendment (changes are in bold and italics):
2.4 - Fair trades and peace treaties; unit transparency
Description: No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent what is offered in trades or peace treaties. No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent unit types.
Definition: Cities can be renamed to names of tech or sums of gold or anything else in an effort to not trade what that opponent agreed to. Units can be renamed to other units and appear to be something else entirely.
Purpose: To prevent the misleading of another team through malicious use of in-game features.
Verdict: Using the renaming 'feature' to name a city after a tech or sum of gold is a violation of this rule. Using the renaming 'feature' to name a unit after another type of unit is a violation of this rule.
Punishment Level: Once – Red (5-Expulsion and forfeiture of double what was not legally traded)
Link to discussion (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=127668&page=3) - Begins in post 59
UN Reps: Please post your team's vote on this amendment.
Option 1 - Yes, my team agrees to this amendment.
Option 2 - No, my team does not agree to this amendment.
Option 3 - My team abstains.
Here's the original rule:
2.4 - Misleading through Renaming
Description: No team or individual is permitted to rename a unit or city with the intent of misleading or confusing opponents.
Definition: Cities can be renamed to names of tech or sums of gold or anything else in an effort to not trade what that opponent agreed to. Units can be renamed to other units and appear to be something else entirely.
Purpose: To prevent the misleading or confusion of another team through malicious use of in-game features.
Verdict: Using this 'feature' or any other feature or exploit that allows misleading or confusing another team is a violation of this rule.
Punishment Level: Once – Red (5-Expulsion and forfeiture of double what was not legally traded)
Here's the proposed amendment (changes are in bold and italics):
2.4 - Fair trades and peace treaties; unit transparency
Description: No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent what is offered in trades or peace treaties. No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent unit types.
Definition: Cities can be renamed to names of tech or sums of gold or anything else in an effort to not trade what that opponent agreed to. Units can be renamed to other units and appear to be something else entirely.
Purpose: To prevent the misleading of another team through malicious use of in-game features.
Verdict: Using the renaming 'feature' to name a city after a tech or sum of gold is a violation of this rule. Using the renaming 'feature' to name a unit after another type of unit is a violation of this rule.
Punishment Level: Once – Red (5-Expulsion and forfeiture of double what was not legally traded)
Link to discussion (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=127668&page=3) - Begins in post 59
UN Reps: Please post your team's vote on this amendment.
Option 1 - Yes, my team agrees to this amendment.
Option 2 - No, my team does not agree to this amendment.
Option 3 - My team abstains.