View Full Version : Amendment to rule 2.4 vote
Oct 15, 2005, 01:37 PM
Another amendment to vote on. (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=131404) Yes, no, abstain or whatever Daghie says. :D
For me, on the surface this seems fine since I don't think we would ever do this type of renaming anyhow. Then again, I'm not an attorney.
Oct 15, 2005, 02:13 PM
I'm for the amandement, since you never know what kind of people are in other teams, thus precision is needed here just to keep order and to avoid any nasty situations.
Oct 15, 2005, 02:20 PM
I haven't bothered to read it, so option #4 for me :)
Oct 15, 2005, 03:56 PM
We have previously stated that we don't care too much about renaming as long as it is not used to make phony deals. The amendment works allright in preventing that and also allows the, by TNT, much wanted renaming practice in other cases. To put an end to this discussion we might just vote Yes because it will have no negative impact on our game as far as I can see.
Oct 15, 2005, 04:16 PM
I see no reason to vote No. I don't really think it's necessary, but it won't hurt anything to say Yes.
Oct 15, 2005, 04:25 PM
Like tom said, we never know what kinda dummmmmmm de di dum dum deee we will encounter.
Oct 16, 2005, 04:45 AM
Seems alright as long as it's the "Description"-part that defines the rule. The "Verdict"- and "Definition"-parts are rather lacking, mentioning nothing about renaming workers to techs or gold, or renaming cities to other cities in order to trade a less important city, for example.
Edit: Although on a second thought I'm not sure if the worker would still be called Computers (Persia) so maybe that's not an issue. :)
Oct 17, 2005, 09:12 AM
OK the vote went 8 for "whatever Daghie thinks" and 4 for "yes".
Daghie will you act as our new UN rep? I think it's appropriate that you should since anyone who can comment about Kant in a public thread deserves to be our UN rep.
Oct 17, 2005, 02:58 PM
On my way.
Oct 17, 2005, 06:09 PM
I know Daghie will do an excellent job, but it was rather sad to read your resignation Whomp. :( I don't suppose it's possible to have two UN reps, huh? Love ya both, man (men)!!! :cry:
Oct 17, 2005, 06:13 PM
Ah c'mon Gram..it ain't no thing but a chicken wing. I have big responsibilites spinning the "eaten doughnut scandal" in the POTKISS offices. :mischief:
I love you guys, (wo)man! :cry:
Oct 17, 2005, 06:28 PM
Awwww, we need a big http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-5/180352/grouphug.gif here.
Oct 18, 2005, 02:10 AM
Sneakin' me in as UN rep. might be one of Whompsies most brilliant moves. There I can BS about everything and nothing and that might just lower my spam rate in here. First a http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads10/grouphug.gif then a few http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads10/pint.gif
Oct 18, 2005, 08:40 AM
Then a few :vomit: ...