For Triumvirate supporters, I have a big question.

What do you, the supporters, see as the key features of the Triumvirate proposal which draw you to it? Which critical things have to be there for it to still be itself? Are you willing to consider a middle ground where the most important attributes of the Triumvirate are incorporated into a compromise government?

I am keen on the well established scheme of how the gov't is set up.

when I think of "Flexible" governments I somehow see a jumble of people congregating with an idea of how they want things to be... and the process takes a long time for everyone to find compromise.

The Triumvate is more structured but still allows for all players to have a voice. It allows for a good distribution of power and won't bog us down with the "But I think it should be this way..." on a million different aspects of the game. While we're bound to still get that I feel it wouldn't be as bad as with a flexible form of government.

:D

The Triumvirate is a goverment while Flexible is a brilliant THEORY

Pro's

complete
balanced
well-thought out

Con's
I can't find a way to take credit for it:lol: