For Flexible (modified traditiona) supporters, I have a big question.

What do you, the supporters, see as the key features of the Flexible (traditional modified) proposal which draw you to it? Which critical things have to be there for it to still be itself? Are you willing to consider a middle ground where the most important attributes of the Flexible (traditional) proposal are incorporated into a compromise government?

Most important parts:
Small amount of 'defined' positions
Ability to create positions as needed
Middle Ground:
Keeping the same role of the Judiciary and Legislative branches
Other things I haven't mentioned
Least important parts:
The actual names of the defined roles. I don't care if it's Military, Foreign, Internal, or Trade, Technology, War, etc.
Whether there is a poll for each person nominated for a created position or it is by appointment

Clearly definded positions so it is obvious who does what.

My major concern with this ruleset is that it's been the least developed of the proposals. There are some significant gray areas that I would have like to have seen development in, as the other sets were putting forth more details.

-- Ravensfire

Simplicity, not to much Beurocratic mumbo. Also gives more trust in the leading officials and supports change to what ever gameplay we choose.