Alphawolf
Dec 17, 2005, 08:25 PM
Do not vote in this poll Links are coming to the others.
Please Vote HERE (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?p=3474655#post3474655) on whether to have Term Limits or not.
Please Vote HERE (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=148342) on how many consecutive terms in one Office is someone limited to.
Please Vote HERE (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=148344) on how many terms an Official must remain out of an office before being able to return.
Please Vote HERE (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=148340) on which offices ore affected by Term Limits.
-the Wolf
Nobody
Dec 17, 2005, 09:03 PM
There is no option for no Term Limits,
Alphawolf
Dec 17, 2005, 09:21 PM
There was one here (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=144747). Term limits were voted in, this is to define what term limits we want.
-the Wolf
ravensfire
Dec 18, 2005, 12:19 AM
General note - this probably should be three seperate polls - way too complicated.
If you run polls like this in the future, please label the options better. For example, you have "One Term" listed twice. Better descriptions would be "May remain in the same office no more than 1 term" and "Must spend at least one term out of the office"
Again, please consider not running polls like this. You are asking three seperate questions here, not one.
-- Ravensfire
Alphawolf
Dec 18, 2005, 12:20 AM
General note - this probably should be three seperate polls - way too complicated.
If you run polls like this in the future, please label the options better. For example, you have "One Term" listed twice. Better descriptions would be "May remain in the same office no more than 1 term" and "Must spend at least one term out of the office"
Again, please consider not running polls like this. You are asking three seperate questions here, not one.
-- Ravensfire
I got your point I put up three. Although I thought the first post explained it.
-the Wolf
DaveShack
Dec 18, 2005, 01:58 AM
There was one here (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=144747). Term limits were voted in, this is to define what term limits we want.
-the Wolf
Always allow the option to vote no. We could (and should) choose to change the result of the original poll. :p
Alphawolf
Dec 18, 2005, 02:09 AM
Always allow the option to vote no. We could (and should) choose to change the result of the original poll. :p
Why?
-the Wolf
DaveShack
Dec 18, 2005, 08:18 AM
Why what? Why allow the people to change their mind, or why should we not have term limits?
I don't think forced limits are the right thing to do. Trust people not to keep running for the same office, and trust the citizens to elect someone else.
And always allow the people to change their mind. Always.
Stilgar08
Dec 20, 2005, 03:38 AM
I don't think forced limits are the right thing to do. Trust people not to keep running for the same office, and trust the citizens to elect someone else.
And always allow the people to change their mind. Always.
Sounds like the urge to put up a new poll about term-limits in general grows out of a completely biast point of view. But I don't mind to vote again as long as this doesn't turn out to "vote until we get what we want" :p
Alpha: Maybe you should close this poll or write the links to the three new polls in your first post.
In addition it's not completely clear which vote is for which position especially for more "irregular" by-passers... You should specify more in the first posts there, also...
Stilagr