View Full Version : SM3 - AWDG in RaR with special rules


Smart
Feb 11, 2006, 12:19 PM
First game (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=150880) was somewhat easy and peacefull (won by SS launch in 1725AD) and I decided to start a tough game full of wars, with special variant rules.

Settings
Version: RaR v1.04b, How to install (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=2687194&postcount=65)

Difficulty: DemiGod
Civilization: Vikings
Victory conditions: All are enabled, but only conquest is acceptable

Size: Standart
Landmass: Continents
Opponents: Random


Standart SG rules:

Don't use any exploits, including ship chaining and free palace jump. If you aren't sure about something (for example you popped an SGL and have to choose what wonder to rush), ask about it here.

There are 24 hours to post a "got it" and 48h to play. If you can't play, please ask about swap or skip before this time is over.
Everybody can roll a start and play first 30 turns. We will play 20 turns per set in the first round to see if AW start is worthwhile, and then 10 turns per set.

Variant rules:

First of all, this is an Always War game, which means that we should be at war all the time with every civilization. Here are AW rules stolen from Handy:
You may only trade when you first meet a civilization, and must declare war on the same turn after trading is complete. If you see a new AI unit, you must make contact & declare war that turn. Absolutely no GPT trades allowed. If you see a new face on F4, you are obligated to declare war that turn (after trading). Players must declare war if they are exploring and see AI units, but are not required to actually attack the units they come in contact with. No peace treaties, ever. You may check F4 as often as you like to spy on the AI's tech, resources, luxuries & city count.

Discuss any move that seems exploitive before doing it with the team. Although there are not too many exploits available in AW, we’ll follow the forbidden blatant exploits banned by GOTM and RBCiv such as no "Free Wealth". Other normal game exploits such as "Baiting the AI" with an empty city to create a kill zone are an AW tradition and are allowed. Also, you ARE allowed to initially keep a city, move a settler to the same spot as the city, and then abandon and immediately resettle. This is considered an exploit in RBCiv rules, but is okay in our AW games. In addition if you need to build a city one square deeper into enemy territory just to move borders to steal a resource, go for it. We may keep or raze cities, and can keep slaves. You may whip at will, including captured cities or cities where all citizens are unhappy.

Pillaging Restriction: Basically no pillaging by armies is allowed. Land units cannot bypass a city without destroying it first. Sea units can go anywhere and drop off land units on any coast. The land units must then destroy the coastal cities before passing them either inland or along the coast (though they can bypass the coastal city by getting back on the boat). The idea here is to lessen the AI weakness of ignoring armies completely and allowing the human massive pillaging freedom. If the AI didn't have this weakness, you could pillage coastal resources by using boats, but inland resources would require fighting your way there. Thus guerilla type hit and run pillaging by non-army units is allowed. In other words, you can drop off a smaller force by boat, pillage, and get away again instead of being killed. (© Handy900)
In other words, pillaging with Army isn't allowed, because AI will NEVER attack it. However we can pillage using normal units.

Conquest variant: We are not allowed to build cities on second continent. We should destroy all civilizations only using our core for unit production and keep conquered land on other continent clear.



Roster:

Smart
Mathias
Madviking
Open!

madviking
Feb 11, 2006, 12:51 PM
DG? :lol: I can barely beat Emp!
I dunno...

Smart
Feb 11, 2006, 01:12 PM
In the last Emp game all AI's were behind by one era :mischief: It was easy enough, I'm sure that DG is an optimal variant. You can play in SG one level higher then usually, because team will help you :)

Mathias
Feb 11, 2006, 01:57 PM
Confirmed.

madviking
Feb 11, 2006, 02:23 PM
I think the Souix are a good civ for AW...

conquer_dude
Feb 11, 2006, 04:25 PM
Will be lurking.

Beorn-eL-Feared
Feb 11, 2006, 04:50 PM
I've been too strapped for time lately to say I'll join, misfortunately. The Sioux are outstanding for AW because of the traits, TSU and UU, but there are other options. Germany, for instance, will have the TSU and the cheap libs, which help a lot in keeping up. Vikings have the TSU and ATAR curraghs to instill war-mode everywhere, plus a tremendous UU.

When I get a break from work I might ask to tag along but right now 10h/week + full time studies is a full plate, and the # of hours isn't going down.

Smart
Feb 12, 2006, 06:32 AM
Thanks for good advices, Beorn, I'll vote for Germany - TSU will do a good job early and in RaR SGL chances are higher because of a lot of techs to learn. UU is very late, but I hope game will not be over when Panzers will come in - pillaging restriction and prohibition of settling on second continent will slow down conquest.
Lets discuss early game goals - what techs will we research (beeline to Dynasticism?), what will we take from philisophy (probably IW), goverment path - Chiefdoom >> Monarchy >> (???). Random suggestions are wellcome too.

We have three players atm, with one more game could be started... Dunno if someone else in SG community have RaR mod :crazyeye:

Roster:
Smart
Mathias
Madviking
Open!

Ansar
Feb 12, 2006, 09:27 AM
Lurking...:)

Mathias
Feb 12, 2006, 09:42 AM
I'll vote for any of the previously mentioned civs except for Germany. I'd rather play as a non-scientific civ.

Oh... barbarian settings?

Smart
Feb 12, 2006, 10:14 AM
You think scientific will be easy because of cheap improvements and SGL's? Remember, we should so self-research in AW game.
Vikings are good too, ensalved units with attack of 6 will roxx in the Middle Ages. And Sioux's UU is slightly useless, imho...

barbarian settings?
Restless.

Mathias
Feb 12, 2006, 07:36 PM
Well, if being scientific leads us to building a Wiseman in every city, then yes, it will be easier. Then again, modern warfare in RaR is awesome, if a bit overpowered. Definitely something to look forward to.

madviking
Feb 12, 2006, 07:49 PM
Did I hear someone say nukes? :p
That'll be fun...

Mathias
Feb 12, 2006, 08:42 PM
Nukes? No. I said "modern warfare." I was refering specifically to Gunships and Radar Artillery

Smart
Feb 13, 2006, 05:08 AM
Now I understand why scientific trait is overpowered in RaR, like agricultural in C3C...
I roll few starts today to get it started.

Smart
Feb 13, 2006, 09:11 AM
I took first coastal start with river. Without food bonuce on start this game will be more tough. Played 30 turns.
I meet Mali and declared war.
Build order was TG >> TG >> Champion >> WH.
Techs were researched: Masonry >> ABCD >> Pottery, queued techs to Urbanization for a walls.

We have two nearby nations. I killed 4 Mali warriors and got elite TG. We have to build stack of Champions (3 turns for each after WH) to capture that red town. We need second city ASAP.

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads11/SM3_Start.JPG

Roster:
Smart
Mathias - UP
Madviking - on deck
Open!

Play 20 turns in the first round to see if we can survive after the first wave and handle the game, then continue with 10 per set.

>> SAVE << (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads11/SM3_Start_2550_BC.SAV)

Beorn-eL-Feared
Feb 13, 2006, 01:33 PM
No bonus start? I'd try to research the food bonus techs before going further towards Dynasticism dude :mischief:

Smart
Feb 13, 2006, 02:34 PM
If you said it before, I'd research Cultivation first too, it is needed for Urbanization anyway :mischief:
But nothing is lost, we will start researching Cultivation next turn, and may research domestication after walls...

Beorn-eL-Feared
Feb 13, 2006, 03:55 PM
Don't forget wool, fishes and wines in the food bonus ;)

Mathias
Feb 13, 2006, 04:23 PM
Olive Oil, too (Urbanization)
Still, I think Domestication is our best bet, as we will need to find Horses.

Worker Housing no good yet. Need 4 shield base to get 1 shield increase. I'll switch that to another TG, then start training Champs. (Got it.)

Mathias
Feb 13, 2006, 06:28 PM
Mali sent two more warriors, 1 vet and 1 reg. The vet attacks, promoting a second TG. I had sent the first Elite to cover worker, just for this chance. The reg forts, so I send champs. Lose one, but make slave.

Pop a hut 3W from Birka, get barbs. No big surprise, but that's actually a good thing. Mali archer kills one, second promotes our champ, third kills Mali archer and later falls to our TG who has just returned to Birka.

Meet Rome, opt not to buy any tech, declare war. Sent three champs to Veii, tested my luck with one, but only knocked a single hp off the TG. Sent the other two around to pillage his road. Another champ has arrived, but I strongly suggest not attacking until we have at least 5 champs there.

The barb camp (defense: 3.5) should keep Mali busy for a little while. Do be aware of the river, which I have overlayed on the mountains. You can see it in-game by using clear map to hide the mountains.

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a190/DMathias/SM3_1750BC.jpg

Smart
Feb 14, 2006, 03:54 AM
It's going right, I hope to find food bonuce after Cultivation. With 2 more champions we have good chances to get that city.

Next 20 turns for you, madviking :yup:

madviking
Feb 14, 2006, 04:09 PM
got it...
dootdoo...

madviking
Feb 15, 2006, 03:14 PM
0- goods.
1- :sleep:
2- Cultivation -> (s)Crap Mining for Iron
3- we burninate Veii getting a slave and 3 workers :D
4- bore
5- start a hardy clan in Trondy
6-8 snore
9- Crap Mining finally comes in. We have iron to the west near the 2 gorges river.
...
16- WE GOT WINES!!! :cheers: (dying to try some new smilies)
17-20 notinhg, cept barbs

save and screenie coming on up...

madviking
Feb 16, 2006, 07:36 AM
SAVE (http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads11/SM3_1250BC.SAV)

http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/5042/sm3stuff6wf.png (http://imageshack.us)

Smart
Feb 17, 2006, 02:04 PM
* reading posts in madV thread *
Madviking, if you don't like AWDG level, or this SG, you can just drop out.
I'm thinking about abandoning this game due to lack of interest, RaR isn't popular now :sad:

Mathias
Feb 17, 2006, 04:10 PM
That would be quite alright with me. I'm not terribly fond of this start anyway. Truth be told, my interest in Civ is waning again.

Smart
Feb 17, 2006, 04:37 PM
Yeah, but why not to say it here? I don't like when people are speaking about something behind my back...