View Full Version : Constitutional Amendment


classical_hero
Jan 07, 2007, 04:57 AM
I propose that we give the exploration to the Commander in Chief.

So this is the Consitution as it stands.
Sultan
*Plays the save.
*In charge of worker moves
*In charge of exploration.

Commander in Chief
*In charge of :strength:, including troop movements and drafting new troops.
*In charge of battle and invasion plans
*Second back-up turn player.

And now here is the proposal as it stands.
Sultan
*Plays the save.
*In charge of worker moves
*In charge of exploration.

Commander in Chief
*In charge of :strength:, including troop movements and drafting new troops.
*In charge of battle and invasion plans
*In charge of exploration.
*Second back-up turn player.

Are there any objections to this admendment?

dutchfire
Jan 07, 2007, 07:42 AM
More work for me :p

greekguy
Jan 07, 2007, 10:04 AM
i guess it would simplify things. it would have my support. :)

gbno1fan
Jan 07, 2007, 10:10 AM
Should we also specify that settlement is under the jurisdiction of the Bean Counter?

Cyc
Jan 07, 2007, 10:44 AM
The proposed Constitutional Amendment is fine by me and I would vote for it in the Official Poll. But I do not support gbno1fan's suggestion. Sorry.

classical_hero
Jan 08, 2007, 05:53 AM
We can just assume that it is under your jurudiction, gb.

lost_civantares
Jan 08, 2007, 07:01 PM
Do we wish for an official poll then?

dutchfire
Jan 09, 2007, 03:40 AM
why not? It might be good to have a poll now and then :p

greekguy
Jan 09, 2007, 01:28 PM
well, to amend the constitution, the amendment needs to be be passed in a poll with a 3/4 vote. so, yeah, we should poll this (even though it will almost certainly pass).

lost_civantares
Jan 09, 2007, 06:16 PM
lol, poll to be posted shortly then. :)

Edit: Posted