View Full Version : Citizen Group: This Thing Of Ours!?
Nobody Feb 18, 2007, 04:21 PM If you have to ask you will never know....
the most prestigous citizens group in demogame history...
presidents ... judges ... governors.... senators... every walk of life...
Pm me to join, all are welcome, Much much more if you follow the white rabit....
Nobody Feb 18, 2007, 04:33 PM Though our membership is hidden, once you join the family the old person dies and the new member is baptised into this thing of ours.
Members
Don:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/uploads/2194/untitled.JPG
Consigleri:
Lil Boy Zini
Captain:
Solider:
The Icepick
The Hat
Picks to follow, Real identitys located at HQ
Disclaimer:
The La Cosa Nostra is primarily a role playing group remember this.
The La Cosa Nostra is not a political party if you join you will never be told or asked to vote a certain way, in elected to a position you will never be told decisions to make. In the event of a trail of a La Cosa Nostra member you will never be asked or told which way to vote. Although La Cosa Nostra recruits a certain type of person, it is no coincidence that often we will vote the same way.
The La Cosa Nostra is not against the government or the moderators. In no way to do condone the breaking of Civfantics forum rules although at certain times we may bend constitutional law to achieve our goals. Although we will not be intimidated by Either Court officials or moderators, The laws are there so the courts have a job and the moderators are their to enforce forum rules not the law if unfairly banned we will appeal decisions in the normal way, in actuality they can ban us but who really cares.
Nobody Feb 18, 2007, 04:47 PM testing something
ice2k4 Feb 18, 2007, 08:57 PM Citizen group membership should be open and visible to all.
Id like to clarify that that's an opinion, and rules pertaining to citizen groups are no where to be found in neither initiatives or the constitution.
Nobody Feb 18, 2007, 10:22 PM hmmm the i posted the same thing twice lol,
Citizen group membership should be open and visible to all.
It actually says in one of the first lines it is open to anyone. And Theres no rule saying our membership has to be open.
ravensfire Feb 18, 2007, 10:39 PM I suspect it's a forum rule, not a DG rule.
-- Ravensfire
Chieftess Feb 19, 2007, 08:31 AM Id like to clarify that that's an opinion, and rules pertaining to citizen groups are no where to be found in neither initiatives or the constitution.
Forum rules supercede that of the Demogame rules. You wouldn't believe the things the demogame's gone through. One time, citizens wanted to vote to ban moderators. :crazyeye:
ice2k4 Feb 19, 2007, 09:56 AM Forum rules supercede that of the Demogame rules. You wouldn't believe the things the demogame's gone through. One time, citizens wanted to vote to ban moderators.
Where in the forum rules does it mention citizen groups, or any other member initiated groups?
Chieftess Feb 19, 2007, 03:37 PM Where in the forum rules does it mention citizen groups, or any other member initiated groups?
If you're referring to allowing and disallowing membership, there is a section in the forum rules about not preventing posters from participating in threads.
Nobody Feb 19, 2007, 04:03 PM Membership is open to anyone, anyone can post in this thread. Spefic details of who is in is only open to those currntly in the group. But all are able to join its fair.
Byshguy Feb 19, 2007, 04:22 PM Interesting, possibly the first "Supreme Court" decision. It seems to me that any group formed should be able to have their membership list open or closed. Perhaps those that disagree should start a different group, I would think the openness would be a selling point
ice2k4 Feb 19, 2007, 04:25 PM @Chieftess I don't think it was an issue with denying membership. Nobody stated that membership is hidden.
DaveShack Feb 19, 2007, 05:26 PM If you're very observant, it's not hidden. ;)
DaveShack Feb 23, 2007, 08:20 PM I split off a discussion of citizen group membership (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=208958). Please continue discussion there and let this thread go back to its original purpose.
|
|