ravensfire
Apr 30, 2007, 10:06 AM
This is a log of all Judicial actions taken in this DG.
This is not a discussion thread
Chief Justices - please create one thread for your term, and update it will all action made during that term.
ravensfire
Apr 30, 2007, 10:10 AM
C4DG2JR1 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5248306&postcount=20): Found to have no merit. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5251403&postcount=35)
C4DG2JR2 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5250487&postcount=28): Found to have no merit. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5251403&postcount=35)
-- Ravensfire, Chief Justice
ravensfire
Apr 30, 2007, 10:24 AM
C4DG2JR3 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5277671&postcount=9): Found to have no merit. The Judiciary does not have the authority to create a process to name things. That authority resides with the citizens. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5291774&postcount=23)
C4DG2JR4 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5277671&postcount=9): Found to have no merit. There is no requirement for a "None of the Above" option in polls in any law, thus it does not need to included as a poll option when naming things. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5291774&postcount=23)
C4DG2JR5 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5278250&postcount=10"): Found to have no merit. The Judiciary responds to specific requests for investigation. It is not here to "police" the game. That responsibility falls to all citizens, who can refer a specific matter to the Judiciary for an investigation.Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5291774&postcount=23)
C4DG2JR6 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5313593&postcount=26): Found to have no merit. Although the correct process for naming the Capital was not initially followed, it was ultimately followed, rendering this request moot.Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5365143&postcount=49)
C4DG2JR7 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5315031&postcount=32): Found to have no merit. The legal requirements in the Naming Initiative were not followed. When noticed, the names were changed to their legally required names, rendering this request moot.Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5365143&postcount=49)
C4DG2JR8 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5365193&postcount=50): The Term Limit clause in the Election Act does not conflict with Article B of the Constitution, and thus is constitutional. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5385169&postcount=79)
C4DG2JR9 (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5377036&postcount=72): A citizen may hold an elected office, and be appointed to another elected office. Ruling (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=5385169&postcount=79)
-- Ravensfire, Chief Justice