civ_manu07
Jun 15, 2007, 10:46 PM
Why?....If select other tell me what is it?
|
View Full Version : Which one is the most important to you? civ_manu07 Jun 15, 2007, 10:46 PM Why?....If select other tell me what is it? civ_manu07 Jun 15, 2007, 10:48 PM dammit i forgot to make a poll.... Rancid Sushi Jun 15, 2007, 10:49 PM Which what? PimpyMicPimp Jun 15, 2007, 11:12 PM I like production, since if you can build anything fast, you can improve your money/culture/military situation pretty easily. Sadly, my last couple games I havn't had very many good production cities :( I think I'm getting worse at Civ as time goes on... Morgrad Jun 15, 2007, 11:16 PM Military - because with it, you can get everything else. PimpyMicPimp Jun 15, 2007, 11:23 PM Military - because with it, you can get everything else. But you need production to make a military :O Dan Quale Jun 16, 2007, 12:03 AM Production is by far most important, production can do anything plain and simple. High production cities are very useful for almost anything, war wonders, emergency commerce and research. Production creates millitary, most importantly, which is why I voted for it over millitary power. potatokiosk Jun 16, 2007, 08:02 AM You can compensate for lack of production by whipping, so I think money for research is important. petermarkab Jun 16, 2007, 08:06 AM I voted other, for food, for without food, you have no population to work production and commerce tiles Mulholland Jun 16, 2007, 08:06 AM Money is certainly the most important and probaly the hardest to aquire. Without it you cant have a massive army or a large enough civiliation to win the game. Not to mention that without it you science rate stagnates. r_rolo1 Jun 16, 2007, 08:07 AM Food.... No food = no citizens + no :whipped: = no money + no production + no military + no culture = no good :( potatokiosk Jun 16, 2007, 08:45 AM Okay, the food people have outsmarted me. Traitorfish Jun 16, 2007, 09:26 AM I'd say production, but food is obviously a close second. Dutch Canuck Jun 16, 2007, 01:12 PM Money, it helps to cover the maintenance costs from growth and seriously affects tech research. And I love buying things quickly once I have the Uni Suff civic! Okay, I admit it. I like shopping. :lol: :D yewsef Jun 16, 2007, 01:44 PM Are you guys who prefer food seriously build everything based on hurry production of slavery? if not, then you need production eventually. r_rolo1 Jun 16, 2007, 01:52 PM ^^true enough, but first things first. You can't work mines without a backup food supply, unless you want a eternal 2 pop city The Ninja Jun 17, 2007, 09:25 PM Money, because with it I can research, buy anything, and support an army. Although, if they were in the game... (Please BTS, PLEASE!!!) Ninjas, because they're NINJAS!!! :D The Ninja :ninja: Rusty Edge Jun 17, 2007, 10:16 PM Whenever I play, I often say to myself "It's the economy, Stupid!" Meaning that if I have a strong, growing economy , I can have whatever I want, or a couple of things I want at the same time. taillesskangaru Jun 18, 2007, 03:00 AM Money rules Civ4. Tech lead anyone? zbyszke Jun 18, 2007, 05:12 AM Food first, everything CAN come later if we have enough food. Mauritania Jun 18, 2007, 08:28 AM Production because it's the only way you'll ever get any decent money, culture and military. BrantleyL1 Jun 18, 2007, 12:27 PM Production preceeds everything, so It almost goes without saying.... I tend to concentrate on military. Maybe not for offense at first, but those damn barbs. Build some axemen and you are safe for a while. I used to worry about money, but don't as much. I'm happy to run a small surpluss. Later, though, it comes in real handy. Nothing like paying to upgrade when you are under attack. Those old axemen and macemen just don't cut the mustard against invading riflemen. salty mud Jun 18, 2007, 12:29 PM Production. Without it, things take for ages to build, and you will lag severly in games. Papa Smurf Jun 19, 2007, 08:04 AM money>military>production> everything else need money for military ddog14 Jun 19, 2007, 11:16 AM I'd go with production, but only as a prerequisite for a strong military. I use military power to make people afraid to declare war on me as I fight smaller civs for resources and land. However, without good production, a military is generally going to be smaller than is necessary, not to mention being an aggressor means you must be powerful at all times, or else you will be invaded. Allenbird Jun 19, 2007, 12:33 PM Oddly enough my favorite one to acquire is culture. I just enjoy creating culture and making my borders expand. To me it's one of the most exciting parts of the game. Quintillus Jun 19, 2007, 11:56 PM Other: Technology. By commerce or by war, technology is #1. Money of the other four, but then again it doesn't help much without production. And it's hard to get lots of production without food. And to get food, you often need larger borders by way of culture. But to defend that territory you need a military. Technology isn't as powerful in Civ4 as in CivIII, though. Neither is commerce, for that matter, with upgrades being so expensive. KMadCandy Jun 20, 2007, 12:27 AM Other: Fun. which totally depends on my mood. the style of game that will be most fun for me that day can vary wildly depending on my mood. somebody pissed me off lately? i'm gonna want to be a warmonger! i don't have much time but i want to play, not do anything supposedly productive? OCC, so there it's probably more production than the others listed, but a very big emphasis on resources that are visible on turn 0 ... if i don't see health at the start, that map ain't gonna work out. just, you know, keeping up my role as the queen of oddball situational answers. King Flevance Jun 20, 2007, 04:35 AM Other - Tech. Although production brings up a very close 2nd, if not tied for 1st. Jerrymander Jun 20, 2007, 04:59 AM Production. It's not on the same plane as the other three items. fed1943 Jun 20, 2007, 06:38 AM Food, first. No food means, no grow,no production, no commerce, no military, no game. Best regards, ngraner42 Jun 20, 2007, 06:54 AM Food is king. Churchill's Hat Jun 20, 2007, 10:18 AM money and food, i'd say-- without very much of either you'd be too low pop or too low technologically and would be playing catch up the entire game. However, I chose money because food is more abundant. Papa Smurf Jun 20, 2007, 11:59 AM Food wasnt one of the choices duh of course u need food Other: Technology. By commerce or by war, technology is #1. good point Quintillus but.. Papa Smurf Jun 20, 2007, 12:03 PM sry hit enter by mistake but.. u need money for science, but.. u need food to grow to have more money but.. u need production to build money maker buildings like market and bank and a military but.. u need techs to hav a more adv army but.. u need money to hav a big army but.. u need food to hav more money ok i think u get it, u need a balance between all no one thing is better then the other ( exept culture ) this is a stupid argument thats not goin anywhere BALANCE OF POWER jkp1187 Jun 21, 2007, 12:17 PM Homer Simpson put it best.... Money can be exchanged for goods and services. :goodjob: |
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.