View Full Version : Should I go for Domination or Conquest?


phoenix_sprite
Aug 02, 2007, 08:18 PM
I just wanna know which one because I<ve started a new game and Im aiming at one of the two!

Realyn
Aug 02, 2007, 08:19 PM
Time win. Sorry but the question is pretty stupid at that point^^

Monty Python Ni
Aug 02, 2007, 08:22 PM
How is it even possible to have a Conquest win? :confused:

By the time you got it, wouldn't you already have a domination victory?

m9x
Aug 02, 2007, 08:39 PM
How is it even possible to have a Conquest win? :confused:

By the time you got it, wouldn't you already have a domination victory?

most definitely, unless all the other civs have all together less than 10% of the land and you have 40%. and then you crush them all. that'd equal conquest iirc

BobTheTerrible
Aug 02, 2007, 08:54 PM
If you raze all their cities rather than capture them, you'd get a conquest.

Tristan daCunha
Aug 03, 2007, 01:21 AM
If you raze all their cities rather than capture them, you'd get a conquest.
Yes, and on larger maps this is sometimes necessary since your economy may not be able to support all the cities you conquer.

An alternative is to vassalize (either voluntary or capitulation) all the remaining civs. This too will give you a conquest victory.