View Full Version : greatest leader of all time
mr_lewington Nov 27, 2007, 06:34 PM i was just think of who i think were some of the greatest leaders of all time and thought id make a post on here i also realise that this is without a doubt somewhere in this area, just thought id liven it up (again?)
cybrxkhan Nov 27, 2007, 07:20 PM there is of course no defnite answers, but i would like to condemn you for your obvious eurocentric choices. :D j/k
anyhow, on my list of the top:
- Genghis Khan - ultimate conqueror
- Asoka - one of the nicest emperors ever
- Quang Truong - Vietnamese Emperor who nearly would've beat the crap out of China had he not died
- Alexander the Great - nice conquests
- Theodora - shes hot, and shes got brains.
But, i do object to some of the choices on the list...
Mao: i don't want to debate this.
Lenin: Similar condition to Mao, except there wasn't as many deaths
Franklin Roosevelt: Thuogh i wouldn't say hes horrible, i think he is sometimes overrated... but im not really sure.
mr_lewington Nov 27, 2007, 09:13 PM hmm ure really a fan of east/ SE asia arent u lol?
cybrxkhan Nov 27, 2007, 09:21 PM ^well, i AM from the east, so that does justify my position, doesn't it? :D
But I just noticed the majority of the leaders are from Europe/European Colonies, so... :)
mr_lewington Nov 27, 2007, 09:24 PM sry but, as being from the west, i know mostly western leaders, u on the other hand probably know just as much if not more on the east
cybrxkhan Nov 27, 2007, 09:39 PM understandable.
oh, and you spelled Ho Chi MinH wrong. :)
Civfan333 Nov 27, 2007, 10:43 PM Augustus Caeser. Worshipped as a saint, started the Pax Romana and of course IS AT THE TOP OF THE LEADERS YOU CAN RULE LIKE!!!!!!:lol: :lol:
taillesskangaru Nov 28, 2007, 12:10 AM This is really hard to judge. And do you mean just national (political) leaders or does this include spiritual leaders and military leaders as well?
Here's some of the best I can think of at this moment:
Genghis Khan - possibly the greatest conquerer in all history
Stalin - yes he was a mass murderer, but he was pretty successful overall as leader of the USSR. Before he came to power Russia was an economic backwater, its people were half-starving and largely illiterate. Stalin changed Russia from that to a great industrial and military superpower, and this is despite revolution, famines, international isolation, near-annihilation in World War II and Stalin's own abuse of power. And if anyone have ever gotten close to ruling the whole world, it was Stalin (by the time of his death he controlled roughly 2/5 of humanity, either directly or indirectly).
Akbar the Great - building and consolidating an empire in India when you belong to a minority group is not an easy task. He did it very successfully.
Franklin D. Roosevelt - started with a country demoralised and crippled by the Depression. By the time he was done USA had became a superpower, militarily, economically, technologically.
Asoka - agree with cybrx. He was one of the nicest (and most successful) Indian rulers (he wasn't always that way though, so he's the perfect role model for people who wanted to reform themselves).
Perfection Nov 28, 2007, 08:39 AM 5 greatest leaders of all time:
1. Don Fifty
2. Don Perfection
3. Thunderfall
4. George Washington
5. Ming
Mirc Nov 28, 2007, 12:40 PM Octavian Augustus... from this list. :)
Zenon_pt Nov 28, 2007, 12:46 PM I always have a name on my head, when they ask me that question!
Alexander, the Great!!!
Is one of the many Great Leaders! But for me, he's the 1st one!
Sorry for the others!
Quintillus Nov 28, 2007, 12:56 PM anyhow, on my list of the top:
- Theodora - shes hot, and shes got brains.
:lol: Play CivIII much?
Greatest leader of all time is tough. Sure, the Great Khan wins for greatest conquerer, but the greatest leader is another question altogether. I abstain for now.
Turkish_Aries Nov 28, 2007, 04:08 PM "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" great protective and creative leader
agree with cybrx Asoka was successful leader in Indian History
GigaNerd Nov 28, 2007, 06:21 PM I chose Lincoln, because he won the Civil War, prevented America from becoming a slave-infested nation, and he had psychic powers! :cool:
Emperor2 Nov 28, 2007, 06:47 PM RONALD REAGAN!!!!!!!!! Deafeater of the USSR, Hero of American Capitalism, Saviour of our position as SUPERPOWER!!!!!!!!!
http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h219/pjcomix/blog/ronald-reagan.jpg
Gustav_Adolf Nov 28, 2007, 06:58 PM The "Ogre"
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/Eastlake_-_Napoleon_on_the_Bellerophon.jpg
Zhuge_Liang Nov 29, 2007, 09:36 AM This is SO eurocentric. :lol:
GENGHIS KHAN RULES!!!!!!
Bast Nov 29, 2007, 09:42 AM http://www.micklebring.com/bml/images/victoria66brithday.jpg
Ruled over a larger area (maritime areas inclusive) and more people than anyone in history.
Verbose Nov 29, 2007, 09:45 AM What the devil is Ramses III doing on that list?
Snofru or Zoser maybe, if someone Egyptian should go on it.:)
Quildavyr Nov 29, 2007, 09:52 AM Ataturk is not an option on this poll!!!
Justinian is not there too..
Mmmh,Elizabeth:)
Mirc Nov 29, 2007, 10:55 AM What the devil is Ramses III doing on that list?
I think he meant Ramses II, otherwise I simply can't understand it either.
aronnax Nov 29, 2007, 11:16 AM I guess Asia doesnt exist in Canadian textbooks
Thats a tough choice to make...I say the bext economist to be Elizabeth or Qianlong
cybrxkhan Nov 29, 2007, 02:35 PM What the devil is Ramses III doing on that list?
Ramses III was arguably the last "great" pharaoh of the Egyptian New Kingdom. Apparently, he repelled a Sea Peoples invasion and did a bunch of other stuff, and is also well known for possibly being assassinated, because there was a confusing little story about an assassination of a certain pharaoh which most likely was him. but despite being so, he is not as "great" as Thuthmosis III, for example.
I think he meant Ramses II, otherwise I simply can't understand it either.
Ramses II, from what I know, was not a great leader at all. He was naive in military strategy, nearly bringing about the entire slaughter of the Egyptian army by the Hittites (had not it been by sheer luck some reinforcements came). And then he built a bunch of useless huge monuments (even more than any other pharaoh, i think) saying how great he was even thuogh he didn't relaly do anything great.
mr_lewington Nov 29, 2007, 05:56 PM I guess Asia doesnt exist in Canadian textbooks not quite, but we do tend to learn about our immediete surroundings before the rest of the world first (gr 10) and i really shouldve put in more asian leaders and for that i apologise
Kahran Ramsus Nov 29, 2007, 06:55 PM I voted other, but only because I didn't notice Bismarck in the list. Within under 30 years of power he transformed Prussia from a minor European power to the strongest nation on the continent and did it relatively peacefully with only two short wars that were far more significant politically than in terms of loss of life.
Saim Nov 29, 2007, 07:49 PM There isn't really "one greatest leader". There are quite a few great ones, maybe a great one per area, but not one greatest one for the whole world.
Kahran Ramsus Nov 29, 2007, 09:13 PM There isn't really "one greatest leader". There are quite a few great ones, maybe a great one per area, but not one greatest one for the whole world.
Of course not, but it does make for good conversation which is the important thing.
Adler17 Nov 30, 2007, 01:38 AM Well, Bismarck lead three wars to unify Germany. Anyway: There isn't a greatest leader in the world. You can't simply compare them. However some on the list, especially Stalin and Mao, should be excluded because of being mass murderers. These guys don't deserve to be metioned here.
Adler
fugazi Nov 30, 2007, 02:37 PM I had a hard time deciding whether to pick Augustus or Bismarck but picked Augustus in the end. Sorry Adler! ;)
Eli Nov 30, 2007, 03:03 PM Alexander wasn't that much of a leader. He was a great conqueror and tactician, but had no understanding of stability and consolidation. Basically a one trick pony.
Victoria didn't have much executive powers.
Julius Caesar was one of the few super-men of history but he didn't live to rule a stable empire so we don't really know anything about this aspect of his personality.
I'll go with Octavianus.
Zenon_pt Dec 01, 2007, 04:05 AM Double post!!!
Zenon_pt Dec 01, 2007, 04:06 AM Alexander wasn't that much of a leader. He was a great conqueror and tactician, but had no understanding of stability and consolidation. Basically a one trick pony.
Victoria didn't have much executive powers.
Julius Caesar was one of the few super-men of history but he didn't live to rule a stable empire so we don't really know anything about this aspect of his personality.
I'll go with Octavianus.
You are right about Alex! But don't forget, he didn't live long!
Julius, if they didn't kill him, maybe he should had been greater then Augustus!
Octavianus???
fugazi Dec 01, 2007, 05:05 AM Goes to show how much you know about Augustus, Zenon ;)
Zenon_pt Dec 01, 2007, 05:57 AM Always mix up the names of Brutus with Augustus! You are right!!!
Julius Caesar Octavianus (Gaius Octavius Thurinus)
sydhe Dec 02, 2007, 01:58 PM Augustus among the choices. Cyrus the Great, Akbar, Asoka, Elizabeth and Canute are all admirable in their own way.
GuitarHero Dec 13, 2007, 08:28 PM Are you all ready to know the name of the greatest leader of all time?
SLASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke:
lutzj Dec 14, 2007, 01:51 AM http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h219/pjcomix/blog/ronald-reagan.jpg
REAGAN PWNS ALL
|
|