Duke of Marlbrough
Jul 10, 2002, 10:42 PM
I think I know what the answer would be to this one, but I'll throw it out there anyway.
Do we wants to have huts in the game? They can easily be removed from the entire map.
duke o' york
Jul 11, 2002, 02:49 AM
We don't want to make it too hard for ourselves do we? We will benefit from some NON units for exploration and be given dud techs to slow our monarchy research! What about some advanced tribes so far away that they'll be crippled by corruption until democracy? The NON settlers are a major plus though so don't think I'm all doom and gloom. Huts add a welcome random element to the game! :goodjob:
starlifter
Jul 11, 2002, 03:19 PM
Well, I can't vote yet due to the BBS problems, but let's have huts :).
Zwelgje
Jul 12, 2002, 11:38 PM
I like the huts, it's a bit of a surprise what we will get when we pop a hut and I like that.
Ren
Jul 13, 2002, 04:02 AM
I agree, huts are goodie :D
MajorGeneral2
Jul 13, 2002, 08:35 PM
I can't seem to vote either, but huts add a nice element to the game. I'd say yes.
Cunobelin Of Hippo
Jul 13, 2002, 10:10 PM
Huts - if you were running for president, they'd vote for you! :D