View Full Version : Builders too powerful
civoholic Jul 07, 2008, 07:37 PM I think builders are to powerful becuase they can automatically make any building or wonder, even the nuke.
I think the change should be they can build 50% of the building (give you 50 resources for collosses 100)
Widowmaker313 Jul 07, 2008, 08:22 PM Thats dumb, then you could just waste two! What difference does it make, the player worked to get the great person so he deserves that bonus!
BOSS NASTi Jul 07, 2008, 08:56 PM Thats dumb, then you could just waste two! What difference does it make, the player worked to get the great person so he deserves that bonus!
I agree. Some players just need to improve their strat to stay ahead of the game. Practice you azz off.
civoholic Jul 08, 2008, 07:48 AM I agree. Some players just need to improve their strat to stay ahead of the game. Practice you azz off.
nice job with the spelling there
builders should complete BUILDINGS, not wonders
espicially not the wonders that can win the game
it turns the game into luck
the first one to get the builder wins
vapaach Jul 08, 2008, 07:52 AM There are not much builders in the game, something like 7. And there are like 40 great people in the game. So its roughly a 1/5 chance to get a great builder.
Widowmaker313 Jul 08, 2008, 10:03 AM There are 20 Great people I thought.
exclamatio Jul 08, 2008, 10:13 AM the first one to get the builder wins
you obviously havent played much online
Widowmaker313 Jul 08, 2008, 02:33 PM Yeah, even online demo will show builders amount to money, because they rush things, You should realize that everything in this game can be counteracted.
EmperorSnefix Jul 10, 2008, 02:30 AM Everything is overpowered, so everything is balanced.
civoholic Jul 10, 2008, 08:01 AM you obviously havent played much online
I have, and you know what, i cant play it, i took 6 minutes just to get through the first 6 turns, the ones where they go through you making your first warrior, online is SO slow, i dont know how i could get through the whole game.
civoholic Jul 10, 2008, 08:02 AM you obviously havent played much online
I have, and you know what, i cant play it, i took 6 minutes just to get through the first 6 turns, the ones where they go through you making your first warrior,it would only take me 1 minute MAX. online is SO slow, i dont know how i could get through the whole game.
Krikkitone Jul 10, 2008, 03:08 PM nice job with the spelling there
builders should complete BUILDINGS, not wonders
espicially not the wonders that can win the game
it turns the game into luck
the first one to get the builder wins
Builders CAN'T rush wonders that win the game (at least not directly)
I do think the Manhattan Project and Apollo Program should be similar to the World Bank and UN (No Rushing)
PimpyMicPimp Jul 10, 2008, 04:54 PM The whole idea of CivRev is for it to be fast and furious (at least compared to it's PC cousins) so it makes sense, to me, for builders to be able to rush whole wonders.
exclamatio Jul 10, 2008, 06:38 PM I have, and you know what, i cant play it, i took 6 minutes just to get through the first 6 turns, the ones where they go through you making your first warrior, online is SO slow, i dont know how i could get through the whole game.
i didnt say you hadnt played i simply said you hadnt played much and obviously you havent :P
civoholic Jul 10, 2008, 07:07 PM i didnt say you hadnt played i simply said you hadnt played much and obviously you havent :P
ah, its okay, i just got on a rant about how hard it is to sit down and play through multiplayer
exclamatio Jul 10, 2008, 08:54 PM keep trying pal it is worth it, it seems like your experience is similar to how mine was
now ive played many more games the bad ones have started to become a minority
civoholic Jul 11, 2008, 09:38 AM Later in the game, when i get my builder, or great scientist, i pick the hardest tech, or the longest wonder to make, so
I think once you commit to making a building or unit, and pick your tech to learn, its your final decision, you cant change your mind
I think it will make the game more stratigic, and you have to plan your moves perfectly
Krikkitone Jul 14, 2008, 03:02 PM Bad idea primarily because it is very unfun and leads to stupid micromanagement
MKElderGod Jul 16, 2008, 03:45 PM Your still a freshie in this game if u think builders win games.
Helmling Jul 21, 2008, 09:08 PM In single player, getting a builder and then rushing the nuke is tantamount to winning, if done quickly enough.
But am I correct in thinking there is absolutely no way to influence which GP you get?
Krikkitone Jul 22, 2008, 03:08 PM Well I do consider Apollo Program and Manhattan Project to be the 'winning wonders' for Tech and Domination Victories.
|
|