Bill_in_PDX
Oct 22, 2002, 10:10 PM
This is a poll to set the official policy of Fanatika.
The relevant discussion for this poll is here: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=553329#post553329
Emergency population rushing was approved by the citizens in this poll: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=34403
The intent of these polls is to define the use of "emergency" pop rushing in our nation.
This poll will remain open for 48 hours, or until quorum is reached
Cyc
Oct 22, 2002, 11:35 PM
I voted ABSTAIN. I feel the question is open to interpretation or just plain misleading (unintentionally, of course).
Shall emergency population rushing be limited to captured cities?
Does this mean that if I vote no, I'm voting that I want pop rushing in our cities too, or that I don't want pop rushing, period? Am I supposed to vote YES cause "Gawd, if you're going to pop rush, do it only in captured cities". Too many questions per option.
Shecky
Oct 23, 2002, 06:34 AM
I couldn't agree more Cyc, I am also abstaining from this vote.
Chieftess
Oct 23, 2002, 07:22 AM
I thought it meant either captured cities, no no cities at all...
I think I need to take Polling 101.
Bill_in_PDX
Oct 23, 2002, 10:09 AM
These are good questions, but the context of the vote is that previously, emergency pop rushing was approved by the citizenry, therefore this question is "Shall we only do such pop rushing in captured cities.
A YES vote means that pop rushing (already approved) can only occur in captured cities
A NO vote means that pop rushing (already approved) can be done in any city
Kennelly
Oct 23, 2002, 11:29 AM
Reading this I vote YES as Pop-Rushing should be restricted as much as possible
willemvanoranje
Oct 27, 2002, 10:32 AM
as soon as a city is conquered it's part of our culture, so we should treat it as an equal. True, pop rushing might even speeden integration, but who can resist us anyway.