Gentlemen

I would like to make this a qualification poll for the consensus proposal, with
Carthage as our main chosen civ and Netherlands as our main chosen civ if another civ chooses Carthage, or we can simply choose Carthage and stick with it anyhow, as Duplicate leaders are allowed.

Best regards

Provo

I'm going to wholeheartedly second this proposal, with my reasons stated in the other thread.

I am in favour of the two civs proposed and would take our second preference if the first is already taken.

I also support the proposal, I'm sure it'll be great either way, both solid civs I think and we'll have fun regardless.

I'm happy with Carthage or the Netherlands, though a Creative/Financial ruler is my favourite type :)

I'm good with C n N, I don't really want to have a duplicate, and they are both excellent choices.

900th post!

Then it is settled, we go for Carthage, if any other Civ picks it, we may decide to take Netherlands (If there are both Carthage and Netherlands taken, we take the civ with the fewest "versions" of it).
Really, Financial trait is so overpowered or multiteam maps so geared to this trait, that its becoming boring.

Should point out - currently the suggestion of how we should pick a leader would require more choices if we wanted to have the chance to switch. At least if the admins are going to require 6 choices.

IMO we could always just do something like
-Hannibal
-Willem
-Pacal
-Darius
-Elizabeth
-Victoria

just listing spare FIN leaders to fill it up. If someone really wants to toss in a break point though - like if all Hannibal/Willem/Pacal are taken we go with India or China or something, that's fine.

Anyway I'm expecting (and disappointed) that all or all but one other team probably will choose from the list of financial leaders. I think Carthage would be cool but I won't cry if there's a duplicate.