Simple Poll. You know the drill.

1. None
2. Sedentary
3. Roaming
4. Restless
5. Raging
6. Random
7. ABSTAIN

This is a public poll and will be open for 7 days.

No villages would handicap expansionistic civs.
Raging barbarians add an additionally random factor, that may add some spice to diplomacy.

Raging barbarians add an additionally random factor, that may add some spice to diplomacy.
I remember some discuss about NoAIPatrol= settings from our last DG. Simple way: No barbarians = no problem, beside someone would play as Maya. But this may not happend anyway. Barbarians from a village would'nt be so bad overall.

Actually that is something I hadn't thought of. I still have the NoAIPatrol settings from when I was playing SGOTM, but it will affect how the barbarians respond. No barbarians would remove the problem.

We have a tie between Sedentary and Roaming. Restless comes in at a close 2nd.

So roaming would be best choice if wie don't want another poll about this.

What kind of decision did CivForum arrive at?

We have not yet voted on barbarian activity.

Cool. Then we have time to do a run-off poll between Sedentary and Roaming.