View Full Version : burning questions
october Dec 19, 2002, 08:56 AM I have a dell with one space for a cd drive. I want a burner. I am thinking of getting an external one to hook up with a usb cable. can anyone think of any major drawbacks to this? Should i buy an internal and replace the drive that is there or leave it and get the external ??? i know externals cost more but I'm willing to pay.
Also can you recommend brands and places to buy?
all advice is welcome.
Civddict Dec 19, 2002, 12:47 PM internal, buy on newegg.com and save money.
usb 1.1 is slow.
CornMaster Dec 19, 2002, 01:21 PM External is slower then internal.
USB 2 or Firewire would be ok....but you have to make sure your computer supports it first. Internal is the way to go...much cheaper, and much faster.
october Dec 19, 2002, 03:41 PM Ok if I go internal, I have to replace my cd rom drive. Can I still burn CD to CD?
Civddict Dec 19, 2002, 05:48 PM yes you can, if you make copy of cd to hard drive first.
Perfection Dec 19, 2002, 06:03 PM Cut a hole in the top of the case for the cables to come out and duct tape an internal burner to the PC, Sometimes you just have to think outside the box.
CornMaster Dec 19, 2002, 11:03 PM I ALWAYS copy to the hard drive first. :)
gonzo_for_civ Dec 20, 2002, 12:07 AM Yeah, get yourself a nice internal burner with at least 52x read speed, 24x write, and 16x rewrite..you'll be thankful you did :)
Fool Inc. Dec 27, 2002, 10:14 PM Of course a x48 write, x12 rewrite, and a x48 read is good too, right :)
hbdragon88 Dec 28, 2002, 02:27 AM Get an external, you're driving at 8x. Get internal and can drive at 12x (OK so what if I'm not up to speed? :rollseyes::)
It'd be easy if you had drive expandability bays, instead of have just one.
damunzy Dec 28, 2002, 09:01 AM Try a DVD/CD-RW combo. I got one...it isn't the fastest burner or the fastest reader but it is darn good. 32x12x10 and reads DVDs at 12x. Not bad since I found it on sale for 40 or 50 bucks.
And I always copy to hard drive first, also. I make no coasters that way while copying from CD to CD-RW was extremely chancey.
|
|