It may have come to the attention of some of you that the supervisor of moderators, 2K_Greg, honoured this subsidiary of the 2K forums with his presence during the last days.
Accordingly, to prove submissiveness, some potentially dangerous threads with heretical content had to be closed immediately.
Should civ 5 have been called civ rev 2.0? (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=410933)
Has opinion of the game changed, or the mix on the forum? (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=410693)
Nothing Wrong With Civ 4 Vanilla (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=410752)

Luckily, threads like Civ is like CRACK (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=410926) have been recognized to add many never before discussed topics to the forum.
Unfortunately, due to time constraints (receiving orders) 2K_The_J has not yet been able to make above mentioned thread sticky. I regret this, but I am full of hope that he will do so in the next minutes.

I am sure that 2K_The_J will have a very successful career in the future, as he knows when and what action of him is expected by superiors. :goodjob:

Someone sure is crabby at the moment. One thread was praising Civ 5 while another praised Civ 4. The third was about changing opinions good or bad. Can't understand the mods reasoning.

:undecide:

Well. we're not supposed to discuss the mods, but he needs to get his PM working again. It's been months now and if he is going to drop the hammer all the time, there needs to be recourse or at least rebuttal/clarification opportunity.

Thread closed.

We do not allow user-specific threads -- especially critical ones -- directed towards moderators, just as we do not allow such threads directed towards any user of this forum.

If you have a complaint with a moderator's actions, please PM that mod. If he does not respond, please contact one of the many other Civ5 mods.

Publicly criticizing a moderator isn't going to make him any more tolerant of your viewpoint.