View Full Version : Poll: Should we make the these alliances against the Indians?
eyrei Jan 09, 2003, 11:26 AM This is a poll to determine whether we should sign the following alliances against the Indians:
Iroquois
We give gems, 4gpt and world map
Russians
We give a new peace treaty, RoP (the Russians will likely be fighting the Indians in our territory), and incense
Babylonians
We give a new peace treaty and 25gpt.
China
We give 37 gpt
Total cost of alliances: 66gpt, gems, and incense.
Shaitan Jan 09, 2003, 11:42 AM Yes, we've been caught in a knickerankular position (pants around our ankles) and need both assurance against a domino effect and strong distraction for our Indian foes.
Chieftess Jan 09, 2003, 12:24 PM Wow.. 66gpt.. Atleast those gems got us something, and we'll have two more next turn IF we can defend Dapperdan.... That should hopefully get more income for the war effort.
Immortal Jan 09, 2003, 04:44 PM yes, any alliances which will allow us the upper hand in the campaign gets my support.
Fier Canadien Jan 09, 2003, 05:20 PM I voted yes because the Indians are a major threat for our security.
They dared to attack mighty Fanatika, let chaos fall upon them.
Donovan Zoi Jan 09, 2003, 05:26 PM Regarding China:
Keep in mind we can save 200g in the long run as China will also accept 540g up front(instead of 37g x 20= 740g). However, I will not let this minor detail affect my support for this plan, as we can fix it later if you find it appropriate to do so.
I vote YES.
TNG Jan 09, 2003, 07:59 PM I voted yes, so what's after this war?
Zarn Jan 09, 2003, 08:58 PM I looks good for the yes option so far. It looks like we have allies.
CivGeneral Jan 09, 2003, 09:16 PM We should distract the Elepants away from our cities.
*Grand Admiral CivGeneral notices the Elephants are heading for Octavian's Peanut Butter Doughnut stash ;)
eyrei Jan 10, 2003, 11:49 AM Originally posted by Donovan Zoi
Regarding China:
Keep in mind we can save 200g in the long run as China will also accept 540g up front(instead of 37g x 20= 740g). However, I will not let this minor detail affect my support for this plan, as we can fix it later if you find it appropriate to do so.
I vote YES.
We are not offering any civ gold from our treasury, so that, if they break the treaty, they get no more than they gave.
Donovan Zoi Jan 10, 2003, 01:27 PM Good call, eyrei.....you are absolutely right! That will also give us more gold for upgrades and knight rushes.
amirsan Jan 10, 2003, 02:10 PM We should pay the alliances to get those Elephant of our back. If we get all the nations surrounding India then we won't have to worry about building as much military units.
Chieftess Jan 12, 2003, 09:47 AM :hmm: why does one person always seem to vote no? Must be an Indian agent...
Octavian X Jan 12, 2003, 10:45 AM It's the same person who voted for the last option in this poll. (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=41353)
Zarn Jan 12, 2003, 03:32 PM Originally posted by Chieftess
:hmm: why does one person always seem to vote no? Must be an Indian agent...
I don't know. Maybe.
*looks at Chieftess suspicously*
|
|