He he, just a FYI. It seems pretty nice but slow on my machine. Well it's using the UT2003 engine but slightly improve I think. Nice graphics but still slow..

Tsss... there's something called a Videogames store... Didn't know that?

Well well well, nobody got it so far?
Yum yum ;) Here's "something" to convince you :D Only Doom III will be better graphically...

http://pcmedia.gameworldnetwork.com/screen/1499/12.jpg

http://pcmedia.gameworldnetwork.com/screen/1499/3.jpg

http://pcmedia.gameworldnetwork.com/screen/1499/6.jpg

Looks good but dark.

Hmm I think I'll have to get this eventually.

Originally posted by GenghisK
Tsss... there's something called a Videogames store... Didn't know that?

Or the internet (if you don't mind slight shipping costs and delivery dates) www.ebay.com or www.amazon.com or (a favorite) www.dirtcheapsoftware.com.

Oh yeah---I would get it too, but no way it will run good on the computer i use for gaming :(

Wow that is the best flamethrower since RTCW!!!!

Ah, my monitor at work is dark, now that I am at home I can see details in the pictures....weird.

Playing Unreal2.....don't like it much. I will give it more time before I pass final judgement though.

I will say that the graphics look awesome, even at 800x600x32bit@85Hz.

From what I've heard from friends, its very short and it doesn't have alot of the features that were mentioned in the previews although the graphics are very nice...

Graphics are very nice, but considering the power that they need, it's normal.
Though, the design is not up to Unreal 1, which had a MUCH deeper atmosphere. This one is rather a military shoot rather than a strange and marvelous exploration.

It's also damn short, which make the lack of MP even more a bad point.
Not bad, but definitely not that good.