View Full Version : Next turn - 3200bc


Jayne
Mar 24, 2003, 03:27 AM
3450bc - Tax changed to 60% science. Production in LP changed to warrior.

Barb horse starts to move south.

3400 - Barb horseman disapppears

3350 - NONE archer heads to RF. LP warrior heads east.

3300 - LP builds a warrior and starts another.

3250 - Nothing of note happens.

http://www.civfanatics.net/uploads4/cfc3200bc.jpg

I'll move on Wednesday or Thursday, depending on how the discussions/polls are going.

:queen:

Elsaak
Mar 24, 2003, 04:16 AM
well, about the SSC west site, there is quite a lot of job : 5 jungles + 2 forests....
and what hurts me the most is that it has 6 squares in commun with RF : isn't it too much ??

Where was the other SSC potentiel site ??

Octavian X
Mar 24, 2003, 11:48 AM
Elsaak is right - I'd rather our SSC have a full radius to work with...

Talar
Mar 24, 2003, 09:37 PM
I agree the western part of the river doesn't look very good for a SSC. Maybe the river area in the black will be better.

naervod
Mar 24, 2003, 11:10 PM
Lets try exploring in the black for a better SSC site.

As for the rest of exploring, Archer should move back to RF if that is indeed its destination. If not I recommend sending him south or southwest to do more exploring. As for the warrior, keep on going east. If you need any help on determining where to explore, check the expansion poll tha tI made. It should be near or at the top.

GaryNemo
Mar 25, 2003, 03:32 PM
Uh, RF will shortly go into civil disorder.

I think there is time for the Archer to move SW W N into RF.

TheViking
Mar 25, 2003, 06:09 PM
A few comments:

LP's production should be changed to settlers.

RF is about to grow to size 2 so the archer must immediately go there.

I'm not concerned about a possible big overlap between RF and a possible SSC (we would simply prevent RF from utilizing the squares common to both cities). A bigger worry is the time it would take to build an SSC at the perfect site WSW of RW because of the time needed to change the terrain. So another possibility is to get an SSC running more quickly just to the NE of the warrior where it would have access to two specials. Not as good but still decent.

LP's warrior should IMO head east and RF's warrior either S or W. We badly need to know what the terrain S of RF looks like.

DvR
Mar 26, 2003, 03:00 AM
Since we won't have a settler for another 8 turns (unless rush-build), my idea would be to move RF's warrior to the East to see if there's an alternative SSC site..

And i agree with theViking, LP's production shoulf be changed to settlers

Duke of Marlbrough
Mar 26, 2003, 04:07 PM
Next Turn Thread (http://www.forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=48672)