View Full Version : New Game


Martin Schmidt
Dec 19, 2000, 07:35 AM
Anyone like to play a chess mach , here
is my first move :
e2-e4

stellar converter
Dec 19, 2000, 08:22 PM
thanks for startin a new game. i would just challenge someone.

Smash
Dec 20, 2000, 04:26 PM
I'll have a go.

1.e4...e6

Martin Schmidt
Dec 21, 2000, 05:00 AM
french defense , outch im not prepared to this http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/smile.gif .

1.e4...e6
2.d4

Smash
Dec 22, 2000, 07:22 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5

Martin Schmidt
Dec 23, 2000, 06:24 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3

Smash
Dec 23, 2000, 03:16 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4

Martin Schmidt
Dec 23, 2000, 05:17 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2

Smash
Dec 23, 2000, 07:10 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4

Martin Schmidt
Dec 24, 2000, 09:55 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3

Smash
Dec 24, 2000, 02:59 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+

Martin Schmidt
Dec 25, 2000, 08:28 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...

stellar converter
Dec 25, 2000, 10:28 PM
me thinks bish x N was a bad move. however, i have no idea how to play french.

Smash
Dec 26, 2000, 01:19 AM
Yes.Perhaps "not the best" would be better.Book line is 5.....Be7

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6

Martin Schmidt
Dec 26, 2000, 10:30 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5

Smash
Dec 26, 2000, 02:54 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7

zoo
Dec 26, 2000, 02:57 PM
i im new here, im from quebec and i want to demonstrate my knowledge of this game on a multiplayer games

zoo
Dec 26, 2000, 02:59 PM
Originally posted by zoo:
i im new here, im from quebec and i want to demonstrate my knowledge of this game on a multiplayer games

i don't really know how it work at the moment!!

stellar converter
Dec 26, 2000, 11:23 PM
do you mean play chess?

Martin Schmidt
Dec 27, 2000, 08:07 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...

Smash
Dec 27, 2000, 08:30 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5

Martin Schmidt
Dec 28, 2000, 09:09 AM
That was a surprise , im lucky to have at
least my next move .

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...

Smash
Dec 28, 2000, 06:57 PM
Not too often I get to make move that threatens 4 pieces.

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5

Martin Schmidt
Dec 29, 2000, 11:26 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...

Smash
Dec 30, 2000, 12:11 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2

Martin Schmidt
Dec 30, 2000, 01:37 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...

Smash
Dec 30, 2000, 08:41 PM
Here we are at page 2 of this thrilling contest allready http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/smile.gif

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6

Martin Schmidt
Dec 31, 2000, 03:51 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...

Smash
Dec 31, 2000, 09:25 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6

Martin Schmidt
Jan 01, 2001, 10:43 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...

Smash
Jan 01, 2001, 08:14 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8

Martin Schmidt
Jan 02, 2001, 04:44 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...

Smash
Jan 02, 2001, 10:05 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6

Martin Schmidt
Jan 04, 2001, 02:37 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...

Smash
Jan 04, 2001, 11:24 PM
That pawn grab sure killed any initiative I may have had.

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7

Martin Schmidt
Jan 05, 2001, 03:12 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...

Smash
Jan 06, 2001, 04:51 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5

Martin Schmidt
Jan 06, 2001, 05:44 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...

Smash
Jan 06, 2001, 03:21 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...Qf7

Martin Schmidt
Jan 08, 2001, 06:12 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...Qf7
18.Nf4...

Smash
Jan 08, 2001, 03:59 PM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...Qf7
18.Nf4...Nxf4

Smash
Jan 09, 2001, 04:24 AM
<IMG SRC="http://www.geocities.com/truesmash/vsMS.jpeg" border=0>

Martin Schmidt
Jan 10, 2001, 03:51 AM
1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...Qf7
18.Nf4...Nxf4
19.Bxf4...

stellar converter
Jan 10, 2001, 10:27 AM
smash will have some problems, me thinks. he(probably) wont be castling any time soon, unless he wants to weaken his position. actually, i dont know, it could go either way. looks as if martin has upper hand, though.

Smash
Jan 10, 2001, 02:39 PM
hehehe..well we'll see.Its a good game though.Unclear at this point.

1.e4...e6
2.d4...d5
3.Nc3...Bb4
4.Ne2...dxe4
5.a3...BxN+
6.NxB...Nc6
7.Bb5...Ne7
8.Nxe4...Qd5
9.Qd3...f5
10.Ng3...Qxg2
11.Bf4...a6
12.Bxc6+...Qxc6
13.Be5...Rg8
14.0-0-0...g6
15.Qd2...Qd7
16.Qg5...Nd5
17.Nh5...Qf7
18.Nf4...Nxf4
19.Bxf4...c6

stellar converter
Jan 11, 2001, 09:38 PM
i was looking for b6, which would have allowed castle, and, however, the loss of a pawn, i think. im trying to go by memoryhttp://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/smile.gif here, ill review topic:

im curious to the reason of the move c6 now. actually, nevermind. oh, hey, whites down a pawn. i didnt realize that. many chances for counterplay though.

Martin Schmidt
Jan 12, 2001, 03:36 AM
I can think of two reasons for the move c6 . First is to prevent d5 second is to free the Queen from protection of c7 , i expected c6 .

stellar converter
Jan 12, 2001, 09:15 PM
d5 is still quite possible, after whites next move, which i willnot say, because i may be accused of helping you. after that move, i do not see anything preventing d5. i might have expected b6, to release bishop. hes not going anywhere now, it seems.

Smash
Jan 12, 2001, 11:00 PM
um..c6 is pretty much forced here.

Martin Schmidt
Jan 13, 2001, 08:02 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...

stellar converter
Jan 13, 2001, 06:45 PM
why is c6 forced?

Smash
Jan 13, 2001, 11:48 PM
Because of d5.

Smash
Jan 14, 2001, 10:22 PM
This is tough.Never should have grabbed that pawn.Attack first,pawn grab later...

19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7

anand
Jan 15, 2001, 05:07 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Smash:
[B]Yes.Perhaps "not the best" would be better.Book line is 5.....Be7

---

Huh? Both 5..Be7 and 5..Bxc3+ are book. According to NCO (Nunn's Chess Openings) both lead to equality. As a tournament player I play the French myself, and always play 5..Bxc3+ in this line. I don't think I've lost a game with this as black yet.

Smash
Jan 15, 2001, 07:21 PM
ssshhhh!

I hope you are not the anand I've heard of.

anand
Jan 16, 2001, 01:36 AM
Originally posted by Smash:
ssshhhh!

I hope you are not the anand I've heard of.


No http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/smile.gif but he's my favourite player.

Martin Schmidt
Jan 16, 2001, 04:06 AM
True , but i have to admit i would have taken the pawn too if i had the opportunity . At this point it didnt look that troblesome to develop your pieces .

19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...

Martin Schmidt
Jan 16, 2001, 04:14 AM
anand wrote :
'Huh? Both 5..Be7 and 5..Bxc3+ are book. According to NCO (Nunn's Chess Openings) both lead to equality.'

That is maybe true but to me
5... Bxc3+
6.Nxc3...Nf6
7.f3...exf3
8.Qxf3...

seems to be a very dangerous gambit . Have you ever encountered this ?

Smash
Jan 16, 2001, 06:41 PM
Nc6 is kinda a "must play" in this line.The alternatives give white advantage early.

I didn't like the pawn grab but I kinda felt like I had to play it to justify Qd5.

19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7

anand
Jan 17, 2001, 12:20 AM
Originally posted by Martin Schmidt:

anand wrote :
'Huh? Both 5..Be7 and 5..Bxc3+ are book. According to NCO (Nunn's Chess Openings) both lead to equality.'

That is maybe true but to me
5... Bxc3+
6.Nxc3...Nf6
7.f3...exf3
8.Qxf3...

seems to be a very dangerous gambit . Have you ever encountered this ?

Hmm interesting. No I haven't seen this before, but then I play 6..Nc6 which pretty much forces 7. Bb5. After that theory goes 7.. Nge7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 0-0 10. Qd2 f5 and that's just the beginning http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/smile.gif

Martin Schmidt
Jan 18, 2001, 03:44 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...

Smash
Jan 18, 2001, 07:54 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5

Martin Schmidt
Jan 22, 2001, 06:20 AM
19.Bxf4...c6 20.Rhe1...Bd7 21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...

Smash
Jan 23, 2001, 07:59 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.K-b1...Qf8

copy and paste

Martin Schmidt
Jan 25, 2001, 03:37 AM
I used linux (netscape) last time to send the message , that copy and paste seems to work not correctly there is only one oddity . It's even hard to read plain text , because it is displayed to small and not sharp . Does anybody know if there is a setting which i have to change ?

19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...

Smash
Jan 25, 2001, 05:38 PM
I use Netscape 4.74 for Mac.My settings in preferences/fonts are:

for encoding-western
variable width-12
fixed width-10
Page specified fonts including dynamic


19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6

Martin Schmidt
Jan 26, 2001, 07:07 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6

Smash
Jan 26, 2001, 04:44 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ

Martin Schmidt
Jan 28, 2001, 07:55 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...

Smash
Jan 28, 2001, 02:47 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8

Martin Schmidt
Jan 30, 2001, 03:38 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...

Smash
Jan 30, 2001, 02:55 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...Kf7

Martin Schmidt
Feb 01, 2001, 03:58 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...Kf7
28.b3...

Smash
Feb 01, 2001, 04:17 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...Kf7
28.b3...a5

Martin Schmidt
Feb 05, 2001, 03:46 AM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...Kf7
28.b3...a5
29.c4...

Smash
Feb 06, 2001, 04:15 PM
19.Bxf4...c6
20.Rhe1...Bd7
21.Re3...Qe7
22.h4...b5
23.Kb1...Qf8
24.Rh3...h6
25.Qxh6...QxQ
26.Bxh6...Rh8
27.Bg5...Kf7
28.b3...a5
29.c4...a4

Smash
Feb 06, 2001, 09:17 PM
<IMG SRC="http://www.geocities.com/truesmash/vsms2.jpeg" border=0>

[This message has been edited by Smash (edited February 06, 2001).]

Martin Schmidt
Feb 08, 2001, 03:59 AM
30.b4...

Smash
Feb 09, 2001, 02:59 PM
30.b4...Rab8

Martin Schmidt
Feb 13, 2001, 03:37 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...

Smash
Feb 13, 2001, 02:44 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7

Martin Schmidt
Feb 15, 2001, 10:07 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...

Smash
Feb 16, 2001, 05:56 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8

Martin Schmidt
Feb 19, 2001, 03:44 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...

Smash
Feb 19, 2001, 05:23 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5

Martin Schmidt
Feb 20, 2001, 03:43 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...

Smash
Feb 20, 2001, 03:16 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7

Martin Schmidt
Feb 21, 2001, 03:27 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...

Smash
Feb 21, 2001, 06:30 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8

I don't like this position much.

Martin Schmidt
Feb 23, 2001, 04:09 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...

Smash
Feb 23, 2001, 02:48 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6

Martin Schmidt
Feb 26, 2001, 09:06 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...

Smash
Feb 27, 2001, 02:36 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R(http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/cool.gif-7

Smash
Feb 27, 2001, 04:24 PM
I accidently made a smily.Apparently 8+) gives http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/cool.gif

should be R-8-b7

Martin Schmidt
Feb 28, 2001, 09:41 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R8-b7
38.Kf4...

Smash
Feb 28, 2001, 07:17 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R8-b7
38.Kf4...Rd6

Martin Schmidt
Mar 03, 2001, 08:58 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R8-b7
38.Kf4...Rd6
39.Ke5

Smash
Mar 04, 2001, 03:39 PM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R8-b7
38.Kf4...Rd6
39.Ke5...Rb-b6

Martin Schmidt
Mar 05, 2001, 10:22 AM
30.b4...Rab8
31.Rc3...Rb7
32.Kc2...Bc8
33.cxb...cxb5
34.Kd3...Bd7
35.Rd1-c1...R(h)-b8
36.Ke3...Rb6
37.Rc5...R8-b7
38.Kf4...Rd6
39.Ke5...Rb-b6
40.Bd8...

Smash
Mar 05, 2001, 11:19 PM
This is becoming an epic.


40....Rbc6

Martin Schmidt
Mar 07, 2001, 02:31 PM
40....Rbc6
41.Txc6...

I dont see a way to play for a win so i propose a draw.

Smash
Mar 07, 2001, 09:46 PM
draw agreed.1/2-1/2

Good hard fought game.The game was almost out of hand before I returned the pawn.After that I felt much better although my position was still difficult.

I thought I could get an edge with 41....Rd5+ but my "analysis" showed me different.What I looked at ended with black having an f pawn and white with a b pawn.Neither of which could successfully promote without the other doing the same.




[This message has been edited by Smash (edited April 08, 2001).]

Martin Schmidt
Mar 08, 2001, 08:38 AM
Thanks for playing.
I think the decision to give the pawn back for queen exange was good. After that my winning chances where minimal because of the different bishops.