Estimates are in the form of production / extra food
Corruption / waste in the form prod-waste / extra food

Noshuret: 6 / 1
Producing: Temple in 1
Growth: in 6
Queue: warrior / warrior / settler

t+1 temple
t+3 Warrior
t+5 Warrior
t+6 growth, production 7 / 0
t+10 settler

Penguinadua 4-1 / 1
producing: Settler in 6
Growth in: 9
Queue: settler

t+6 settler
new production 3-? / 2
new settler in 10 ?
New Growth in 2
t+8 growth to 3
t+13 growth to 4

Gorina 4-1 / 2
Producing: temple in 15
shields invested: 15, remaining 45
Growth in: 4
Queue: Palace prebuild

t+4 growth
new production 4-1 / 2
shields invested: 27, remaining 33
New growth in 5

t+9 growth
new production 5-1? / 1
new growth in 10
shields invested 42, remaining 18
temple in 5 (2 shield underrun at 4 turns)

t+14 temple

Analysis

Noshuret would grow too slowly to build settlers beyond the upcoming one, unless the plains get irrigated.

Penguinadua needs to mine a grass and irrigate a plains to get consistent production.

Gorina needs a plains irrigated in 9 turns to continue growing each 5 turns, and would benefit from a grass being mined, the temple would come in 1-3 turns earlier.

Is this worthwhile information? Comments please! :D

I focus on Gorina since I am "Minister of Worker Relations of the great city of Gorina / Deputy Mayor". I've just finished my advice to Cyc, mayor of Gorina here (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=53270&pagenumber=3) . My conclusions regarding the laborer use in relation to happyness and the queue are the same as yours. It's nice that 2 people get to the smae conclusion independently.

I think it is an excellent report, d8575. I think this would be instrumetal in helping us use cities as effectively as possible.