View Full Version : DG4 Game Options: Barbarians


Donovan Zoi
Dec 04, 2003, 10:17 PM
This is the Game Options discussion for Barbarians.

How do we want our barbarians served to us in DG4?

No Barbs
Sedentary
Roaming
Restless
Raging
Random

This discussion will run for 5 days, after which I will post a poll.

CivGeneral
Dec 04, 2003, 11:03 PM
I personally like surprises. I normally have the barbarian settings on random. But since we are in a monarch game, I believe we should play with restless barbarians.

Cyc
Dec 04, 2003, 11:19 PM
I say roaming, but if the people want more of a challenge, a higher setting will be ok.

Ankka
Dec 05, 2003, 07:00 AM
IS this played on Monarch? Was it chosen earlier, or is it set to be so always?

Anyway, I think all the choices are fine, roaming or restless may be the most fun, though.

Falcon02
Dec 05, 2003, 10:15 AM
Random

Rik Meleet
Dec 05, 2003, 11:59 AM
As violent as possible. Combined with my preference for many opponents (forcing us to deal with diplo, trade, FA, sci etc.) the barbs will force us to build up military as well.

Donovan Zoi
Dec 05, 2003, 04:43 PM
I always prefer Raging Barbs, but think that Random barb activity could also be interesting. What if we prepared our military for a barb ransacking and later found that the random setting was No Barbs? Could be an interesting dynamic.

Bacon King
Dec 05, 2003, 04:46 PM
lets go with Raging, it will make the game more interesting.

TerminalMan90
Dec 05, 2003, 05:25 PM
:mad: Since there was a space victory last time, maybe we should get our agressiveness out this time. Let's go Raging Barbs.:mad:

DaveShack
Dec 06, 2003, 09:30 AM
Except for occasional RNG hijinks, raging barbs -> elites. I'd say as high as the people can stomach.

Noldodan
Dec 07, 2003, 03:02 AM
Crank the nob up to maximum barbs.

Inter4
Dec 07, 2003, 01:54 PM
Restless should be good.

Eklektikos
Dec 08, 2003, 10:20 AM
Random. I like the extra challenge that uncertainty brings in the early game.

Furiey
Dec 08, 2003, 10:54 AM
I usually play on random settings for the added interest/challenge of working out what’s what, but elsewhere (land mass, water coverage) I have avoided random so we get a map suitable for a demogame. Here I think any level would be suitable so we can stick with random and at least have some surprises in the game.

Random for me.

ybbor
Dec 09, 2003, 09:15 PM
i say restless, not so extreame that it becomes a problem, but enough that our treasury gets early bosts, and we quickly get elites. we want barbs to be a factor in he game, puting it on raging would mean we would spend more effort on barbs then we need to, don't let the barbs rule our game

Sarevok
Dec 10, 2003, 12:51 AM
Random sounds like a good choice.

Donovan Zoi
Dec 10, 2003, 06:34 PM
Poll has been posted. Please vote here (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=71567).

Strengefuhrer
Dec 13, 2003, 02:29 PM
I used to think the most violent barbs was good. However raging barbs are just too random and unpredictable. I vote for restless.

Aramazd
Dec 14, 2003, 12:58 AM
random