Shall we ratify Article K of our Constitution as follows?

Article K: All irreversible game actions must progress during a public turnchat, while reversible game actions(ie build queues) that adhere to legal instruction can be prepared offline.


Relevant discussion

DG4 Discussion - Const: Article K (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=70274)

Please vote Yes, No or Abstain

This poll will run for 96 hours.

I voted Yes.

I voted yes.

From what I read of the Article K discussion, I assume that the details of "reversable/irreversable" and "Legal Instructions" will be spelled out in the CoL.

Good work guys.

I vote YES

Voted no. This is a step in the right direction but we should allow for off-line trades and treaty making as well.

Originally posted by donsig
Voted no. This is a step in the right direction but we should allow for off-line trades and treaty making as well. I would support a clause that allowed for brief pre-turn actions (city investigations, trades, etc.), but they could always be done in a brief chat designed to do only that action.

I also support this for the same reasons as boots. We should only have brief-preturn actions such as trades. ONLY if it takes place in the chat room.

Sigh - such feedback would have been nice earlier - too late now though.

-- Ravensfire

i voted yes just to get these articles out of the way however as ravensfire said we need to have more feedback during discussion not during polling times.