Shall we ratify Section G of the Code of Laws (Chain of Command) as follows?


G. Chain of Command
1. Determines the Designated Player if the President is unavailable for the turn
chat.
A. If no citizen in the CoC is present at the game play session, the session shall be ended.
2. Settles departmental jurisdiction conflicts.
3. COC
A. President
B. Vice President
C. Minister of Internal Affairs
D. Minister of Defense
E. Minister of Foreign Affairs
F. Minister of Trade and Technology


Relevant Discussion
Section G: Chain of Command (http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=72144)

Please vote Yes, No or Abstain

This ratification poll shall run for 4 days.

-- Ravensfire

Sure

I think third in command should be the minister of defense when we are at war.

But I will vote yes anyways.

Originally posted by Sharkey
I think third in command should be the minister of defense when we are at war.

But I will vote yes anyways.

Great to see new people both voting, and participating, Sharkey!

So that you know, during the game, it is entirely possible for citizen's to change the laws and influence the direction of the game in that manner. Once we get the actual game going, you, as a citizen of our fine country, can propose and lead a discussion on modifying the CoC to something else.

Enjoy the holidays!
-- Ravensfire

I support this chain.

I was in the third DemoGame, just not very active, so most people think I'm new.

The Chain of Command section of the Code of Laws has been Ratified with a vote of:
Yes - 20
No - 2
Abstain - 1

--Ravensfire