Ankka
Mar 20, 2004, 12:59 PM
So, for easier referring to units, I suggest we rename them all. :)
I'll put up a list for names for units.
I could also put up a unit- specific list, if you want. So that a warrior wouldn't be called S/S Treshold or anything.
Well, ideas? :)
Gainy
Mar 20, 2004, 01:28 PM
I was just thinking we needed a thread like this ;)
I don't think we need to name all of our units, just the ones that are going to be used for offence and exploration - then again, we might not know what units we're going to attack with.
What I posted in the other thread just before seeing this:
We could name the Eastern warrior Edward and the Western one Wally
It would be a kinda boring if we were to use make names like they are in the Pacific war Conquest, hence, I chose more fun ones :)
Names of units should be circumstancial...
Peri
Mar 20, 2004, 02:30 PM
Edward and Wally are fine by me. :)
Pegster
Mar 20, 2004, 02:36 PM
I go for Knut and Arvid:)
Ankka
Mar 20, 2004, 11:26 PM
Hmm... I like oth suggestions, But I think Edward and Wally sound better and are easier to remember. :)
DZ, could you please rename the units when you next time play the save?
Donovan Zoi
Mar 21, 2004, 09:44 AM
Edward and Wally, eh? :mischief:
I already played 3400, but I will try to remember to rename them next turn. :)
akots
Nov 10, 2004, 09:25 PM
Please note that according to the rules we cannot rename units in the game unless we add the names to their denomination. So, it will be SUPER EMP - Javelin Thrower or Patton - Ancient Cavalry.
Provolution
Nov 10, 2004, 09:38 PM
then we should nominate and denominate special units.
Swordsman: Belisarius
Medieval Infantry: Borgia