View Full Version : the best ideas you will ever see


soren
Apr 12, 2004, 02:48 PM
From now to its release, this will be my official cIV idea list. I will make update when the ideas come to me, which can be found at the bottom.

The Purpose of this list is:
a) to inspire the civ community
b) to actually influce the game for the better; for Firaxis to take a serious look at these ideas (and hire me;) )

[Important stuff is now highlighted in Red ]
[Popular idea (determined by feedback) are in Deeppink (Thus far, #31)]
Here goes:

1) Immigration: Immigration is a BIG factor in civilizations. Just take a look at, say, America - if it weren't for it's large amounts of immigration, it would never be as powerful and influential as it now is. Different people coming in contribute to the innovations, etc. of civilizations and nations (perhaps you can acquire new techs when enough people come from a civ to yours which has for a time had those techs). If your people are happy, and you have a government that is appealing to people, other people from other civs will immigrate to you. Your population increases, theirs decreases. Of course, you can set you policies not to allow them in), and it also largely depends on the other civ. And vice versa. Also, when you are at war with another civ, people from that civ living in yours can become unhappy, and if it is a liberation effort, you can have the opposite effect. Maybe even have a statue of liberty wonder, which increases the chances, or maybe when you build it, you can/must give it to another civ as a present (like France to America). And internally, too, people can move form city to city. For business, education, etc.)

2) Introduce the media: the media plays a crucial role in our society! TeeVee, Internet, Telecommunication! For one, you could propagate propaganda to other civs, and maybe they will become more loyal to you. Or do it to your own people, lie to them about wars, but in a democracy/republic, in wars for instance, their effects could be increased war weariness too, as a risk. But it has a lot of other applications other than war. Internet, for instance, increases globalization and the passing of ideas. Perhaps, with the Internet, you can acquire non-technical techs (such as communism, philosophy, as oppose to nuclear power or computers) other than with the standard research, since people share ideas.

4) Terrorism (aka, modern barbarians): You have barbarisms, I know, but I've never seen ancient-style barbarians with axes running around recently. There should be different kinds for different ages: You may have pirates or looters in the Middle Ages, then guerillas and terrorists. But they also work differently. For one, modern barbarians don't have a physical "hut" and other things, and you start them up for different reasons...maybe even have cyber-terrorism...you spend money on defense...when you have an attack, your economy goes down the drain, but also you may use it to your benefit to go to war in demo/republic and use it as a justification.

5) Other leaders: you have the military leader, and they just added the scientific to conquests, why not have others, such as cultural or religious or political? They should all be able to do something unique pertaining to their qualities...maybe even have great naval leaders, like with land military leaders.

6) Civil wars!: not all civs and nations started out in the beginning. For example, America came to be when it parted from England...you can have them when cities are too far, or isolated from the other cities, or your people are unhappy, something like that. I think corruption was put it to diminish the unrealistic omnipotentness of large empires, but this will add something.

7) Satellites: They have them in conquests, in where they reveal the map. They should have many other operations: for example, for a turn, they should allow you to, say, eliminate fog of war in any location on the entire map.

8) Highways and superhighways: as for land transportation: first, you have roads, then railroads? does it stop there? why should it?

9) economics: there is not much of this in civ. people don't realize what an effect this has on civilizations and nation. I'd like to see concepts of tax levels, investments, business cycles, markets, (un)employment...for example, in communism, you have universal employment, but no capitalism…

10) Have something like national parks. Some square are unoccupialbe by cities, like mountains or jungles. So why not create other uses for them, like national parks, which have, for instance, bring in income or make people happy…also have environmentalism…also maybe be able to create nuclear power plants outside the cities, and connect them via power lines.

11) You should have the ability to trade units. Think about real life. It is often that countries give weapons to other nations. You should also be able to loan money, but have interest on it.

12) Have the ability to transport food from city to city. Perhaps a turn is lost if it doesn't make it that turn via transportation. Also, you may even trade it…

13) Oil rigs, it's an idea...

14) It's a neat idea, but borders are not solely determined by cities and culture! You should be able to claim land by other means. Let me ask you: does Alaska have cities with culture to fill all the land? Also, add the ability to trade land, like the Louisiana purchase.

15) Growth is not determined solely by food availability. Especially later, such as in the modern age, food in plentiful in certain places such as in the US or Europe, but people don't want kids. In this time, there should be enough food, and maybe a new tech (refrigeration, for instance) which helps out here (for example, make it so that each person required 1.5 food, or food output is slightly increased), but, for various such as economic reasons, people don't want kids. Another incentive (good economics and employment) to keep the people happy.

16) wind affecting movement of galleys? probably a bad idea...

17) better interface: for example, if i wanted a certain tech, it is damn inconvenient for me to go and ask each other civ to see if they have it. instead, the advisor should tell right away...

18) the future is cool, but i always thought it's better to have a more developed present and past. But maybe just a little into the future, like cloning could increase population, or nanotechnology, which can do something else. If not that far, perhaps some postmodernism, such as String Theory, or Deconstructivism.

19) there are various ways to keep people happy. Now, it's religious buildings and luxuries, which is all good and well, but not good enough. Later, secularism comes, which diminishes the temples effects (It also depends of governments - for example, temples should have almost no effect in communism - gives more viriation in the game which adds to strategy). Looking at luxuries: they make people really happy like in the middle ages, when nobody had baths, so perfume was on high demand, etc., but now, there are other comfortabilities which make people happy…also, if people are unemployed they are happy, religion too…

20) I think it would be cool, and more realistic, if coliseums, instead of having a fixed number of making people happy, have a percentage.

21) black market? Drugs? Terrorism?...Monitoring nuclear and other WMD?

22) the international space station? Olympics? A supreme court or other national institutions? Welfare: money vs. unhappy people rioting…healthcare?

23) more and different governments, like theocracy or oligarcy. And even have variations, like constitutional monarchies, or virtual and direct representation. Also, the anarchy thing is kind of weird, as is the transition. Does America first become facist to support the units and end WW when going to war in Iraq? Perhaps it should be easier to switch to a more liberal government. It should take longer to become fascist from democracy, than become fascist from monarchy. If people near your civ are revoluting, it spreads.

24) A more detailed tech tree!!! …thus more techs, wonders, improvements…such as staue of liberty, String Theory, Hammurabis code, …

25) Have the UN play a bigger role.

26) you have mountains, but don't you find it unrealistic that a warrior can trek grassland as easily as, say, mount Everest?! have special mountains, that only planes, helicopters, and special unites can go through. Other stuff with terrain, such as terrain transformation over large periods of time…

27) forest fires, earthquakes…

28) underground tunnels? like in japan, or the one between England and France? farms...?

29) how your recourses deplete should depend on how much you use them, in addition to them depleting randomly.

30) resources should have other than military applications: just think today - the US, for example, uses oil for not just military, but for us, citizens, who need to drive, heat our homes, fly, etc...later, upon researching certain techs, you could eliminate or diminish this need (THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT AMERICA SHOULD DO!!!). !!!

31) I say you have more buildings that have negative side affects, such as the power plant (which significantly increases shields, but has the chance of a nuclear meltdown). The best example I can think of is universities: instead of producing 50% science, I suggest it produce more, such as 70% extra, but also increase dramatically war wiriness and have more resistance to "bad" propaganda imposed by the gov. For govs which have no WW, theses should create a minute resistance (like with Iran).

32) Viruses: you have diseases from jungles and marshland, why not have viruses? like SARS. the effects: some citizens may die, others will be unhappy (or both). YOu need to stop it before it spreads. maybe hospitals will do the thing, or the human genome project…or just time….

33) Protectorates: you know, like Guam or something. Sometimes, you don't want to destroy a city, or run it…

34): maybe, maybe, have bridges: you need some tech first, and you can only do it across ONE COAST square, and it should be more complex than a simple workers' action...

35) have an education system, or other civic systems.

36) with corruption, perhaps it should be reduced upon the discovery of certain techs, such as nationalism, media, computers….speaking of techs, it's weird that you "research" techs like communism or philosophy…it's more like they're ideas that spread…

37) perhaps the cost of, say, aqueducts should be based on its distance from fresh water…perhaps this should be cheaper with engineering…

38) air-bases are new in conquests. I think there should also be military bases, seaports, etc. as well.

39) people can start revolutions if they are not happy to something like communism, and you must do something about it. No civ has existed for more than a thousand years, there must be more obstacles…..the Russian Revolution as an example…this increases when civs around yours start having these revolutions…

40) for military units, perhaps have moral and "support the troops" effects?

41) this is more of a minor miscellaneous thing, but civ relations (is this already implemented?) should depend also on governments. For example, fascists and commies should not get along, democracies and republics should.

42) another minor, misc thing: terraced hills in the future?

43) another weird idea: the first civ to circumnavigate the globe (this possibility should be available only after magnetism) gets a bonus (such as +1 movement for the next x turns).

44) other ideas: social engineering, natural wonders, the idea that tourism (via national parks, natural wonders, great wonders, etc.) makes other people loose tourism revenue, trading posts, less war (?),

45) get units and resources from private businesses (only possible in certain governments), like the US gets planes from companies, or oil coming from oil companies and well as governments…

46) …and oh so much more!

soren
Apr 13, 2004, 09:19 PM
My worst fears have came true: this thread, with zero responces, quickly swifted to the second page. Why do you do this to me? By the way, I will, if I find the chance, try to update the list tonight.

oagersnap
Apr 14, 2004, 05:47 AM
I like your ideas about bases, about the UN, about protectorates, and about borders not only being affected by cuture.

General Porkins
Apr 14, 2004, 12:28 PM
#43 reminds me of "golden ages" triggered by certain feats (ie circumnavigation, discovery of concrete) in call to power 2.

i like the idea of seperate military bases to create and garrison units instead of in cities.

also, food should be tradable. how many food producing farms are there in industrial cities like Pittsburgh? you could lose a certain percentage of food each turn it was in transit, which would disappear with refrigeration.

#32: instead of city growth being limited by sanitation, let it grow as normal but with increased chance of plague with each extra population over 12 or whatever value they make it until sanitation.

#27: more natural disasters. volcanoes are just a little too random. have earthquakes, hurricanes, tidal waves, tornadoes, disease outbreaks, whatever. they dont have to be too serious or too often, but they would stir up some action every once in a while and make the game a little more realistic.

i like 39 too. how many times has a monarch decided on his own to lead his country into democracy? there should be revolutions by the people according to a total national approval/happiness meter, which could be decreased by sacrificing some income and maybe population with an adjustable martial law meter and/or secret police small wonder

trading/selling/hiring units...throughout history arms and weaponry have been sold/traded to other nations, there have been mercenary armies etc. this needs to be part of the game

terrorism: have a terrorist funding slider (maybe not until modern ages). this will take income but it will produce negative effects in target nations cities somewhat randomly (ie loss of pop, disorder due to fear, destruction of improvements etc.) with effects becoming more serious with increased funding. or maybe have a terrorist training center improvement/small wonder, allows you to build units with a terrorist flag (invisible, have no nation) that you can give a target or specific orders upon creation but then they are out of your control. also have a "coutner-terrorism" slider. funds sent here will decrease severity and frequency of terrorist activity. maybe have it also reveal suspected countries funding the attacks or have some kind of intelligence bureau to do so.

General Porkins
Apr 16, 2004, 12:00 PM
i think its somewhat sad that people just dismiss a post to to its length. i think soren has some pretty good ideas, and i think you should all read them.

Pirate
Apr 16, 2004, 12:30 PM
Most of this is rehashing things that appear in other threads, but one idea that struck me was having tradeoffs for different city improvements.

Your example of universities producing science but also increasing war weariness is great.

There is another thread about how to make individual cities have their own character and this may be how that is acheived.

<edit> Oh, and I don't think it is post length that discourages posting in threads like this. I think this forum should be one topic, one post. That way specific ideas can be discussed. Threads like this with lots of ideas by one person create lots of cross discussion and repeated ideas which turns into spam.

Shyrramar
Apr 16, 2004, 01:31 PM
1) Immigration...6) Civil wars...

There are threads about these (and some other)...you should join in! You have good ideas!

but I've never seen ancient-style barbarians with axes running around recently.

I think I just saw one going under my window... Probably on its way to a convenient store to chop itself some sausages...

The idea about terrorists is nice, but would it cause too much trouble?

16) wind affecting movement of galleys? probably a bad idea...

:lol: Yeah...

25) Have the UN play a bigger role.


I like this one. In MOO3 they tried something like a Galactic Union or whatever, but it didn't quite work. The idea was good though, and could be made to fit into the game. There could be resolutions that you can vote on - and be stuck with the decisions. Such as "no torture"-pact, which would increase happiness, but perhaps increase the success of spies of other nations.. "No spying pact", well, this could be used to prevent some nations to spy on others. The spying nation would of course oppose, but the ones who didn't spy would like it. The spying nation could either comply, or resign, or something.. An idea with endless possibilities! :)

26) you have mountains, but don't you find it unrealistic that a warrior can trek grassland as easily as, say, mount Everest?! have special mountains, that only planes, helicopters, and special unites can go through. Other stuff with terrain, such as terrain transformation over large periods of time…


This is a good one too. It would easily bring a bit more tactics into the game...

34): maybe, maybe, have bridges: you need some tech first, and you can only do it across ONE COAST square, and it should be more complex than a simple workers' action...

This would be nice. Canals would be nice also. Just for one tile, as you suggested. It should be costly (you wouldn't have those everywhere, as you don't now... perhaps one or two per continent), though.

31) I say you have more buildings that have negative side affects, such as the power plant (which significantly increases shields, but has the chance of a nuclear meltdown). The best example I can think of is universities: instead of producing 50% science, I suggest it produce more, such as 70% extra, but also increase dramatically war wiriness and have more resistance to "bad" propaganda imposed by the gov. For govs which have no WW, theses should create a minute resistance (like with Iran).

This is one of the best ideas I have heard. This would in effect force me NOT to build every improvement to every city. A university would be necessary only in biggest cities if I wanted to wage war. A peaceful nation would then be more easily the leader in tech. Nice thinking, Soren! :goodjob:

weird that you "research" techs like communism or philosophy…it's more like they're ideas that spread…


It is indeed weird. Still weirder is that you research polytheism and monotheism!

This is a nice thread. Many ideas are ideas that cannot be done, but its the ideas that count. Some ideas might lead to another idea, that is actually something that could be implemented. It's the length that makes people scared of it. Hopefully the developers have enough interest and energy to read it through.

You should take an active role in other topics, too, your ideas are sorely needed! :)

soren
Apr 16, 2004, 10:11 PM
Originally posted by Shyrramar
There are threads about these (and some other)...you should join in! You have good ideas!

This is a nice thread. Many ideas are ideas that cannot be done, but its the ideas that count. Some ideas might lead to another idea, that is actually something that could be implemented. It's the length that makes people scared of it. Hopefully the developers have enough interest and energy to read it through.

You should take an active role in other topics, too, your ideas are sorely needed! :)

Thank you for your feedback (and other too)! It is much appreciated.

I would like to comment on other threads more oftern (I do on some), but I have a lot going on that it is at times difficult to devout time to it.

Do_Sa_Nim
Apr 20, 2004, 04:10 PM
26. This is a great idea. Also, I think that its unrealistic that mounted troops can go into mountains and jungles. For the most part mountains and jungles have been infantry only types of terrain. This would make a demand of a really solid modern infantry unit. (not like to TOW but better).

There should be a new tech called telegraphs that make it so workers can build telegraph lines. All cities connected to the capitol would have their corruption reduced. The corruption would be reduced again with telephones and telephone lines. Radios should cut corruption in all cities regardless of their connection to the capitol by half.

Anyone thinks these ideas are good? Or is it just me

Do_Sa_Nim
Apr 20, 2004, 04:12 PM
26. Forgot to add this.... tanks and mech infantry shouldn't go into mountains or jungles unless theres a road. Thats why there weren't many tanks in Vietnam.

Do_Sa_Nim
Apr 20, 2004, 07:43 PM
I forgot to explain why tanks don't do good in jungles. I think its fairly obvious. For a tank to be at its best in needs to be in open ground. When it gets into less open spaces the firepower is reduced becuase of its inability to manuever. It's effectiveness goes down in forests, hills, and cities. Mabye there should be a combat subtraction from tanks in those areas. . . . but mabye not.

Pirate
Apr 21, 2004, 08:08 AM
Originally posted by Do_Sa_Nim
There should be a new tech called telegraphs that make it so workers can build telegraph lines. All cities connected to the capitol would have their corruption reduced. The corruption would be reduced again with telephones and telephone lines. Radios should cut corruption in all cities regardless of their connection to the capitol by half.

I have long thought that this should be so. Mass communications is huge, which is why I was so upset when they took "Radio" out of the game with the latest Conquests patch.

Hawaii is not totally corrupt just because it is far from Washington DC!!

I think corruption should be based on connectivity. The more links (road, rail, telegraph, radio, airport, seaport, free press, etc...) the less corruption. There may be tradeoffs like more war weariness, but overall communication is beneficial.

Further, roads, railroads and highways should decrease corruption based on distance (i.e. the longer the road, the less effect it has on reducing corruption) but overall railroads are better than roads, and highways are better than rail, etc... Instantaneous communication like telegraph and then radio are not based on distance, but have a blanket effect (but could be affected by government and/or religion).

rcoutme
Apr 21, 2004, 08:33 AM
I believe that one of the problems with the Hawaii problem is that the wrong government type was given universal corruption. Anyone who thinks that Washington is less corrupt that San Francisco because it is the capital of the United States needs to read a newspaper!

Democracies and Republics need to have universal corruption, how high that corruption is can be debated, but they are the gov'ts that have more universal corruption. Meanwhile, Communist governments have all sorts of problems with outlying provinces.

Zenon_pt
Apr 21, 2004, 03:04 PM
soren what was n.3?

Shyrramar
Apr 21, 2004, 03:08 PM
Originally posted by rcoutme
I believe that one of the problems with the Hawaii problem is that the wrong government type was given universal corruption. Anyone who thinks that Washington is less corrupt that San Francisco because it is the capital of the United States needs to read a newspaper!

Democracies and Republics need to have universal corruption, how high that corruption is can be debated, but they are the gov'ts that have more universal corruption. Meanwhile, Communist governments have all sorts of problems with outlying provinces.

I second this! :goodjob:

Ultraworld
Apr 21, 2004, 06:54 PM
From now to its release, this will be my official cIV idea list. I will make update when the ideas come to me, which can be found at the bottom.

LOL, I got one too

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84804

soren
Apr 21, 2004, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by Zenon_pt
soren what was n.3?

hmm...that's strange...I really don't know. I first wrote this on a seperate notepad document, so I will check there. Otherwise, it is possible I accidentally skipped #3. Thank for pointing this out, I will check it out.

Do_Sa_Nim
Apr 21, 2004, 09:48 PM
I think the reason why communism is has universal corruption is becuase it would suck other wise, to put it eloquently. If communism was stripped of its communal corruption, then what would replace it to make it good?

Osubaker
Apr 21, 2004, 11:16 PM
Great list of ideas, I love the idea of improvements having positive and negative effects. Like shyrramar said you wouldnt be able to mindlessly build every single improvement. Would add some additional strategy to the game. Hopefully firaxis visits these forums and adopts some of these ideas for civ 4.

Id like to see the ability to set advantages/disadvantages for units when facing different enemies. For example id like to add a flamethrower to the game and make it wickedly effective verse infantry but weak verse armor. Or a sniper that can kill infantry but not armor. Etc etc

Khan Quest
Apr 22, 2004, 01:42 PM
Soren,

While I find it complimentary that you claim my ideas as your own (satellites, terraced hills, and more) as well as other’s ideas, your not adding anything to the discussion. Try elaborating on the old ideas – How or when they might be implemented, how it could affect gameplay, pros and cons, etc. Simply restating other’s ideas is just spam.

I do like your good/bad trade-off of city improvements idea, but all the others we’ve seen before.

soren
Apr 22, 2004, 07:57 PM
Originally posted by Khan Quest
Soren,

While I find it complimentary that you claim my ideas as your own (satellites, terraced hills, and more) as well as other’s ideas, your not adding anything to the discussion. Try elaborating on the old ideas – How or when they might be implemented, how it could affect gameplay, pros and cons, etc. Simply restating other’s ideas is just spam.

I do like your good/bad trade-off of city improvements idea, but all the others we’ve seen before.

While I do have many ideas that are common by now, I have many unique (or so I think) ones. I am merely stating the ideas as they come to me, even if they are already discusses. I consider these all "mine," in the sense as I thought of them. Everyone else can also call it theirs. Some examples of non-so-much-discuess ideas: improvments with good/bad affects, the aquireing of non-technological tehcs as being ideas, dedicating land to national parks, growth not only determined by food, happiness production (say a building) maying a certain percent as oppose to fixed number of people happy, resources being used outside of military, government property (what you control) as being bought from private businesses, etc.... Thank you for the feedback, and I will try to have less already-discussed ideas andelaborating on those.

timberwolf4545
Aug 26, 2004, 12:06 PM
did you ever consider some of the negatives of being massivly ahead of other civs? and this is kind of tied to immigration.

- Immigration could cause overcrowding and possibly starvation if not controlled.
- Immigration could also cause wages to drop making some people very happy, some unhappy and tax revenues to drop.
- A severe differnce in the standad of living form one civ to another could cause facotries to shut down in the richer civ forcing a shift in how economies work.

Trade-peror
Aug 26, 2004, 04:09 PM
A number of economic (and related) features that you have suggested as possibilities in your list have, incidentally, also appeared in my 2nd Edition of the Unified Economic Theory thread (link in my signature). For example, tax levels, markets, international trade, supply/demand, unemployment, the private sector, and education are discussed in that thread, and I would very much like to see your comments and suggestions!

mortalmadman
Aug 26, 2004, 04:17 PM
nice ideas scorn. I would read more but I feel like washing my eyes out with blood. :blush: THAT WAS HUGE! :sad: :eek: :crazyeye:

K.F. Huszár
Aug 27, 2004, 03:44 AM
soren, it is very-very good thread, however, it is rather a contents (or a short list) what all the people here is awating for in Civ4.
Anyway, many (if not all) your ideas had been spoken out here BUT there were no such a list!!!!
I find religion and demographics (population growth and decline + immigration) especially important.

slyda
Aug 27, 2004, 04:44 AM
Hawaii is not totally corrupt just because it is far from Washington DC!!

I think this idea can be really expanded on. for example during the age of Imperialism, when England owned i think it was one third of the total population it didn't experience total corruption in places like Australia or India.

i don't know if you mentioned it but what about trading food inside your own borders. this has historical roots as Egypt exported grain to the city of Rome during the heyday of the Roman empire.

No civ has existed for more than a thousand years, there must be more obstacles…..the Russian Revolution as an example…this increases when civs around yours start having these revolutions…

This is untrue; Ancient Egypt lasted a lot longer than one thousnad years, albeit not without its revolutions, additionally many European countries are celebrating their one thousandth birthdays, like Denmark which has the oldest manarchy in the world.

Bigfoot
Aug 27, 2004, 11:47 AM
Soren, Thanks for this list. :goodjob: I had previously posted a suggestion similar to #1, and I think there were other players here with a similar idea. One thing, it is important to remember not to design a game that is too complicated. If a player has to micro-manage everything the game becomes tedious and ceases to be fun. Often there is a tradeoff between playability and historical detail and accuracy. Of course, to the extent that these suggestions can be implemented without slowing down game play, I am for most of them (other than the 'wind direction' concept). One thing, can you expand on how you think religion will be factored into Civ 4? It is hard to assess some of these items without understanding how game play will be affected. Thanks again.

rhialto
Sep 21, 2004, 05:54 AM
I think they should make it possible in some governments for the capital to have WORSE corruption than the outlying cities. In some government models (such as corporate republic) that actually makes a lot of sense.

No offence, but using the name of one of the lead programmers for civ4 as your nick seems rather presumptious of you, and is apt to cause some confusion.

soren
Dec 30, 2004, 10:53 PM
I think they should make it possible in some governments for the capital to have WORSE corruption than the outlying cities. In some government models (such as corporate republic) that actually makes a lot of sense.

No offence, but using the name of one of the lead programmers for civ4 as your nick seems rather presumptious of you, and is apt to cause some confusion.

Actually, this was not at all my intention in choosing my nn. In fact, I have never hear of the programmer until much later after joining this forum. I choose Soren as a nn after the philsopher, not programmer.

danegeld
Dec 31, 2004, 08:06 AM
back in civ 1? you could take over a city and then say mmm make this a city controlled by X civ or was that when you took it with espionage?

it was kinda cool becuse you maybe didnt wnat it becuse it was too far away and there would be a coulture flip. or maybe you were busy and couldnt fight but you wnated this other PLayer or AI to have it so they could be a thorn in the side of the player/ai you jsut stole it from

I still miss where you destroyed the capitol of a rival civ and it caused a scism where half the nation joined some other nation