May 31, 2004, 07:47 PM
I recently bought this game because all my mates said do it and I did it and I found out that there is only 1 Panzer that does'nt look like Panzer adn I think that in the new game they have to put more panzer and Tiger because what's the point of only one since Wermaxt was very powerfull and mecanized
they have to put stukas too but maybe thats asking a lot for a new game...
thanx Itried to put the smile but it does'nt work so smile
May 31, 2004, 07:58 PM
Welcome to CFC [party] :banana: [dance] :hatsoff:
the goal of civ3 isn't to replicate historty down to every last detail (you's make hundreds of units if you were this particular about muskets, and cavalry) the game shows a nations movement through history, and you can't get to caught up in the details to stop enjoying the game. and just out of curiosity are you sating the panzer doessn't look like a panzer, or a tank diesn't look like a panzer, or a modern armor doesn't look like a panzar
May 31, 2004, 08:13 PM
Welcome to CFC
I think you could add to the game units that you feel that are missing. There is a big library of units http://forums.civfanatics.com/forumdisplay.php?f=60
I'm sure I saw several Panzerkampfwagen including Tiger, Tiger 2 and Panther although I'm not sure about JU87(stukas)
you can find how to add them here http://forums.civfanatics.com/forumdisplay.php?f=57
and you could also use a completed modpack about the specific period like this http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=18078
May 31, 2004, 08:25 PM
to msny spekllingh errorss to reeed do yorhy messauge, i m sorrie pleese yrite aGEN
May 31, 2004, 08:34 PM
I think you shouldn't. It is not polite.
go over your own posts for a start, The last great naval battles proofed that battle ships were becoming redondend if you are so good at spelling.
You really did not get what he meant?
Jun 01, 2004, 06:45 AM
Verowin and Garbarsardar, stop fighting each other.
Jun 01, 2004, 07:00 AM
So, on topic: I think there should be a little more variety of units in the game, but only if each has its own benefits that make it worth building, so maybe a faster panzer with less attack or without blitz or a panzer who's especially strong vs. Infantry and so on...
If only one type of panzer is the best for all actions then they don't need to put in more panzers...
Jun 02, 2004, 08:44 AM
So, on topic: I think there should be a little more variety of units...or a panzer who's especially strong vs. Infantry and so on...
Yeah, give us the Flamer Tank! :goodjob:
Jun 02, 2004, 12:39 PM
As long as I get my super star destroyer...
oh wait wrong game ;)
Seriously tho. More units != Better or more fun game. To have more variety for every single possible tactical situation would bog down gameplay and make micromanagment even worse than it is. I feel that Civ IV should focus on less micromanagement without dumbing down the game. IF you want all kinds of units, play smac. Or smac 2.....