Search results

What do you think? Standard map, speed, shuffle, emperor/immortal would be settings.

Are their any that are so OP that you won't play them out of principle or they are too easy? I find I don't play Persia as I feel it's just too strong. I never played Scythia either, ever.

Japan gets rated god tier or top tier on other forums and gaming sites but bottom tier on this forum, odd.

In a peace deal you get 1 gold 1 luxury and peace but you can get that exact same deal and a relic too. If you take the relic are you cheating? I want the relic so bad it looks so nice and shiny.

I was playing Peter and planned on Divine Spark as I was thinking about a culture game. Then I see my capital has 2 cows and 1 horse with 2 sheep 4-5 hexes away that city #2 can snag and another horse 4 hexes on the other side for city #3. I feel I have to take GotOS no matter what now and was...

Do you care about warmongering penalties? What about when you are playing a Civ like Macedon or Persia? Do you even attack friends sometimes if you feel like it? Does it matter even if it is egregious penalty? When playing Macedon for instance do you feel it best to wait for a casus belli? or...

What tickles your fancy?

Me too, I feel like dropping down to King. Emperor seems annoying to me post-patch like they cheat more or something.

My poll: Is Civ 6 more difficult post-patch and have you changed the difficulty you play?

I need opinions on this. Many people say divine spark is a no-brainer but what if you have 5 pastures in your first 2 cities? Still take divine spark?

What's your favorite difficulty to play? Is it lower than what you can consistently beat?

I wonder what keeps people playing with an AI rated that low (2)? Civ 6 is obviously a popular game and a successful title. I assume the majority play single player as I do. So it's curious how it hasn't completely died if the AI is this bad.

Like enough for several cities or do you just maybe post a few troops there and ignore it for the rest of the game?

How would you rate the depth of gameplay and the AI in Civ 4, 5, 6? 1-10 scale would be nice.

The AI does that? I'm impressed.

I recently came back to game and was researching a prophet I had 1 turn to go and no one was close, on the turn I was supposed to receive the prophet I got nothing and on the great person screen said something like no more can be recruited. Any idea what happened?

I haven't played this game in many months thought of coming back but wonder if this DLC is worth it, price seems steep to me

This game apparently has some good mods out and universal acceptance of a horrible stock AI. If you choose not to play with mods, is there any particular reason? Such as the stock game provides a good enough challenge? Or the mods don't make enough difference for the trouble?

The graphics are a strong point of the game IMO.

So build IZ in every 3rd city more or less?