Is this stat based on players who play it more than a few months? Or based on the 95% that move on to other games after few weeks.I do not believe the core players stay on low setting.
Old World and Gladius are 1upt and better than any Civ A.I in combat so that is a nonsense reason.The reality is Civ A.I is not a priority for the devs as it does not sell copies.The amount of work they did with A.I each patch was small.
With these new devs and the stupid stuff we got in...
Because people want to play an A.I that can use the systems well and not massive cheats that make the game unfun because they are not really playing the game.
Civ4 is overated in my opinion mainly because it was the first Civ for many players and have that nostalgia that Civ2 does for me.It is not a special game like AplhaCentauri was.Civ5 was better and Cvi6 will be after a few expansions.
They're very much behind the curve compared all the major strategy devs on the market in this regard.It almost seems like arrogance because they sell well.
Yeah and most will stop playing next week like Angry Biscuits and these reviewers who give a half broken game 94%.We are the core who needs half an A.I to continue to enjoy it..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.