Search results

Sorry, what? Did you actually just use the BIBLE, the Old Testament nontheless, as a reference for HISTORY!?

This is despite the fact the Royal We was first used by Victoria. Yes, I was also very dissapointed with England's greeting (as well as its leader... and its name for that matter)

And this has been admitted by Greg that some Civs will only do well on default settings. But this is like saying that your strategy won't work if Diplo and Space are th eonly victories allowed, that's changing the settings. Firaxis aren't going out of their way to make MP less enjoyable, they...

As has been said before on this Thread, Civs are no longer balanced on UA alone, they are balanced as a whole, UA, UU and UBs.

They didn't even say the word 'organic' :lol:

By a very loose definition of 'started'. I could just as easily say it started with the Magna Carta.

Americs 1) America- Either as the 'Mario' Civ, or as an economy-focused one. While I personally don't agree America is a Civ, more a mixing-pot of Civs, I couldn't see a Civ game without America. 2) Aztecs- It was either these guys or the Mayans, and ol' Monty is pretty much a fixture in Civ...

I only agree in so far as she gave the people confidence. Elizabeth was a success story in so far as she probably made the best use of propaganda ever seen at that point in history. British people back then, and even many today, are convinced she was a great Queen, despite most of the credit she...

Wait... What? So, you just admitted everyone has a dark side, including your beloved King... And then you claim everything negative that is said about the King is 'garbage'? I'm sorry, but this is just complete hypocircy. Wow, you have completely failed to listen to anyone who has shown...

However, this would still thwart the attmepts ot make the AI behave like a human, because human players still wouldn't care if an AI was the same Religion as them or not.

I'll drop the issue and stop arguing, but I can't guarentee I won't utterly destroy Siam in game if I have to :p.

The problem of religion as I see it is that in real life, yes it caused countless wars and detahs (and that is why I, presonally, despise religion), but almost all of the wars, with a few exceptions, were basically minor scuffles in the scheme of things between border countries, they didn't...

Japan, purely because they seem to have the most red in their borders. Also, I kinda voted in the poll before Zeroes were confirmed to be quite a bit blander than I expected, but still: Samurai! The next game I will probably be Persia, and attempt to play a financial game where I buy everything...

-Social Policies, I just find them to be a really good idea, and might encourage more roleplaying, rather than with Civics where you just went for what was msot convenient. -No Health, I found the Health mechanic to be really quite annoying, placing another limiter on growth besides food. -No...

This is also an incredibly redundant argument as it can be applied to absoloutely anything. "People who supported Mao believed that Mao's Governemnt was great, therefore you can't criticise it", "People believe what Al Quaeda are doing is for the greater good, therefore they can't be...

This may be due to the fact that I haven't seen 2K Greg in the time this topic has been up, so I don't think he's here. And to be hoenst, I do think we have a reason to think you overly conservative, you respect the monarch only on the basis thta a few kings you've had in the past did a good...

Wait, what? So basically, he's evil because he made health care almost free... :confused:. Basically, all you're making out is that the 'red-shirt' (whoever they are, I presume you mean socialists, whom I sympaphise with) saw him in the same light you seem to see the Monarchy in, so I'm still...

I would just like to ask if it is in the whole naitonal conciousness of Thailand that the King is the greatest person ever, because, to be quite honest, that is a very silly thing. Especially if it was based on the achievements of one guy, most of which are based on the expansion of an Empire...

I'm sorry, I agree with you on everything else, but this is just silly. It's obviously not King Naesuan, otherwise you'd have endless Naresuan clones in your army, sicne even one unit is represented by multiple people. Besides, witht he Great Generals it is likely there will be national heroes...

Wow, I do think you're in trouble. Also, thsoe Warriors in the bottom left are walking on water, that's another graphical bug they'll be fixing, I presume.