Search results

Hi Tabarnak, Yeah aesthetics make it more fun for me; I'd say that contributes a lot to my enjoying the new game on single player mode, but even with Civ 4, when animation for battles was disabled, you would at least get to see your troops move. Also, not being able to see the other leaders...

This is what I'm hating about Civ V. Multiplayer with friends was my favorite part about Civ IV. Civ V's multiplayer just sucks right now because much of the fun has been disabled from it.

This is a quick thought that has been bugging me. I've not seen it mentioned on here, so I thought I'd post to see if anyone has any thought on it. It seems to me that City States make up for some of the benefits you could receive with corporations and religion, from Civ IV. That being...

When people talk about the complexity that religion/corporations brings to the table, they seem to forget about the role of city states--they really take up the slack with the loss of religion and corporations. You get cultural and indirect financial benefit from allied city-states.

I ended up unintentionally winning a diplomatic victory. Every city state voted for me. It was grand. :-) Though, I still don't get how his happiness was so high (I saw it in one of the ranking lists). It just doesn't make sense. He had so many cities.

Yes! He's taken over the world and done everything to pick a fight with me. He has a ton of cities. I thought he received extra happiness from the size of cities and then that was negated by the number of cities. He keeps on spreading. Now, all city states are against him because he's...

One thing I've noticed in a couple of games now (on king level). India dominates the globe on a large map. They will start taking over everyone around them without any seeming consequence. I thought there was more angry faces with the larger number of cities that they own? It seems like it...

... I miss is how everything would change when you go from one era to another. I liked how even the music set changed in other Civilization games. With 5, I have not noticed much of anything that differs all that much when you go from one era to another. I think that change helped give a...

I just built a system and Civ 5 was one of the motivations for me in doing that, so I've been looking at current stuff A LOT for the last month or so. Here's my two cents: Stretch it to Quad Core, and your power supply is not sufficient to power a decent graphics card. Civ 5, from what I've...

I'm loving it too--especially in relation to the actual game play itself. Everything else I don't like has more to with what I'm use to from the past, but that will change, I suspect, as it has with every new version. (I took started out at Civ II).

I've never even heard of a deluxe edition. In the last week or so, I just built a new computer system, keeping this specific game in mind. I have a GTX460. What is the deluxe version? Is there something in it that the "regular version" doesn't have? I wish I would have known about this.

I think AA becomes less important the higher the resolution you're playing on--maybe you're playing at 1080p or above, so that's why you can't tell a difference? I know there is some point at which it doesn't matter and it is of no use having it on. Ironically, if it's the higher GPU cards...