Search results

I haven't been able to figure out how to automate workers at all. Help?

Has anyone else noticed that the autosave intervals are verrryy large in this game? Back in Civ IV, the game autosaved every 4 turns--I thought that was very reasonable, especially considering it saved me from having to redo hours of my life when my game crashed. But in Civ V, autosaves are...

More leaders in addition to civs!

I miss... 1. Scenarios and Maps (I loved RFC) 2. The music! Civ IV's era specific music was great (Industrial was the best imo) 3. Map trading 4. Worker automation 5. Religion 6. Civics...to an extent. The new social policy tree is really cool, but I liked being able to switch gov'ts...

BtS was definitely the best iteration of Civ to date. Even if you forget about the huge amount of options, gameplay, random events, etc that it introduced, the scenarios that were shipped with the game ALONE would have made it the best.

Interesting, Napoleon was phased out very early in my game, killed off by a combination of Hiawatha and Rakhmahaeng (sp?). In fact, in my game, Darius has been THE warmonger, so far taking out Augustus and Ramses, in addition to building a loaddd of wonders.

QFT. This really needs to be patched please!

I haven't gotten that far yet, but really? No more one currency or nuclear proliferation votes?

Thanks so much! I was taking a totally different, Civ IV esque approach where I would build a large empire, create lots of units, invade, and annex everyone. I guess I was playing this like Civ IV.

Please sticky! A lot of these may be subjective, but a lot more are legitimate issues!

When I read these threads, I feel liek there's something wrong with me. At some points I'm fighting for my life on Prince >.<

Did they patch the bug where leaders literally give away their whole empire through negotiations?

Some posts to add: * Map Replay: When the game is over, I always loved going into the map replay and seeing how my empire and others grew. Not any more :( That was a really helpful feature, as well as interesting because you could see what was going on in those 2000 years in that other...

Oh wow really? I didn't know that at all... Were the Civ III and Conquests scenarios also fan made? I mean, if so, then I no longer have that big of a gripe with Firaxis about this. (although they COULD have made scenarios and maps internally... :P)

Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz ATI X1300 2 GB RAM 30 GB Hard My GPU is below minimum, so I'm running the whole thing on minimum and low settings... :( native resolution is 1650, but due to frame rate issues, I've had to drop it to 1024. I tried leaders on medium and the sound began to go...

Will do. I haven't had much time to play a large amount of matches, but we'll see what happens once I kick back this weekend :D

THESE TWO. Especially the first one. I have no idea why Firaxis would remove them at all. It doesn't make sense to me... But I disagree on the point of UI. I think it has been streamlined to be more easy to use, as I can certainly keep tabs of my empire much more easily now. While I do miss...

Shucks...that's not fun to hear. Oh well...I guess I can always use the strategic view option. Is anyone experiencing this issue who has a graphics card at or above minimum reqs?

Has anyone noticed that Bushido seems really overpowered? When I was playing as the Japanese Empire, it was really helpful, sure, but I can imagine being an opponent of Japan and getting utterly pissed off when my opponent has Bushido. Basically, it becomes unnecessary to build up more than a...

Hmm so basically if a city is too far away, there's no more need for roads? Just use a harbor? What about, say, transporting from City A to B?