Search results

Older Civ games from 1-4 and including Civ Rev, the player spends a lot of time in the city screen. First, the city screen in these earlier versions were much easier to view and parse. Most importantly the player bonded with these cities they painstakingly nurture. I would check up on them every...

V and VI may be more technically advanced, but not necessarily more aesthetically pleasing or strategically deeper or interesting. 1. With the rush for new graphics, ironically the screen became more cluttered and harder to distinguish between elements. At a glance, hard to tell apart units...

Some (many? most?) ancient cities were surrounded by walls. (Note how city walls in the game only cover the center tile.) Naturally when population inflates, excess population must move and settle outside the walls (long before high rises, so building upwards was not feasible.) They also...

seems the real problem is the Shape of cities. why is every city built as a circle around the initial city center? natural expansion is to expand where there is usable land. seriously what (ancient) city looks 50 miles into the ocean and claims that as usable area of the city? instead even...

this game scales fine for 3840x2160,

Wrong forum. Answer is yes.

Civ 4 may have the most depth and breadth strategically. But Civ 2 made you feel like a god.

uploaded new version for the patch

compatibility update for 11/16 patch

Chinese American updated CA Enhanced Main Menu with a new update entry: compatibility update for 11/16 patch Read the rest of this update entry...

yep seeing all the roads everywhere makes the map look a lot more impressive and reflects the majestic progress of your civ. the detriment of Civ 5 keeps removing immersion and grandeur of your empire

I just came to the same conclusion. Civ 5 and 6 have identity issues. They want to be both empire builder and tactical wargame, but is good at neither and satisfies neither fanbase. I'm more solitaire player, so i dont care if AI is dumb. So my main drive in Civ games is the rewarding gameplay...

5 and 6 turned the series into a bunch of mini games. Lots of minor things to do, but none of which are particularly fun, compelling, or satisfying. Such as unstacking armies and cities were supposed to make the game seem more "strategic". But in reality just adds more tedium and makes warfare...

Just add this line at the end of \UI\FrontEnd\IntroScreen.lua : AcceptEULA(); and comment out the previous line: --Startup();

I'll see what I can do. Can you describe the situations where features cannot be removed? Coasts get the same benefits. However Ocean tiles never get resources. Unless you want me to put them there as well.

within the Steam folder, look for the folder mentioned in the first post. backup the two files MainMenu.lua and MainMenu.xml. extract the .7z that you downloaded to replace these two files.

it fills as much as possible by raising the probability of putting a resource on a tile. there may be other factors that may prevent a tile from getting a resource. it doesn't discriminate which type of resource; that part of the code is untouched. ideally there should be more resource types in...

New map option "Resourceful" to have resources fill the map.

Chinese American submitted a new resource: Resourceful - Map is filled with resources Read more about this resource...

to get rid of micromanagement, remove the map screen entirely. have a button to directly launch an attack on target city. no more complaints about 1UPT versus stacks.