Search results

Not posted in 2 years but I will to say that's a really nice touch to see a dev here.

Merry Christmas. :D

Also, who takes the time to upgrade a slinger to level 4?

France already has the Garde Imperiale and I could be wrong but I think that's enough of a nod to Napoleon to justify his exclusion this time.

I'd rather have exclusively new civs but since we've got an alternate leader system in place, I'd also rather have it used by a few more civs and I know I wouldn't pay for a separate dlc for them.

I have no trouble believing some civs will get 3 and others stuck with 1 like in Civ VI. Not that that's a bad thing, Kongo wouldn't really work with another leader.

What if GH stands for Georgia, Happy? and we are finally getting Tamar? :bounce: I can dream.

Assuming we get Mali, Indonesia and some Egyptian leader in the DLCs this is my line-up. Mongols Incas Cherokee (or Iroquois) Dutch Ottomans Swahili/Kilwa Khmer Korea Ethiopia, Georgia or Armenia Germany - Bismarck India - Chandragupta France - Louis XIV

Algonquian (Any) 21 Anasazi/Navajo/Other SW NA 20 Bohemians/Czechs/Great Moravia 18 Nazca/Moche/Muisca/Other Andean 18 Olmecs/Mixe-Zoque/Other Mesoamerican 12 Sabaeans/Himyarites/Yemen 15 Swiss/Belgians/Other Western Europe 3 Tamil/Chola/Sri Lankans 14 - The Cholas give necessary Indian...

Hold the thread. IF? As in they could and they have or they haven't but could have and we can't know if the could is a did or a did not? :aargh:

I think it's supposed to be random within eras to avoid players being able to target specific people in the queue.

https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/different-approach-to-science.615544/

Production before Merchant Republic, gold after a couple of traders start travelling internationally. Not because production becomes less useful but because gold becomes a viable alternative wherever the city is. Another thing is unless I'm playing a rare domination game, I find I prefer rush...

The direction a unit faces is purely aestheticand based on the last direction they moved in. Flanking is when two enemies are adjacent to the unit being attacked.

It's a decent idea but I think it might be liable to snowballing: You happen to meet a couple of barbarians early a defeat them -> you get ahead on military points -> unlock new units earlier -> win more fights/produce more units -> stay ahead all game. It's not hugely different the current...

I think the biggest problem with pollution is hat it only effects the very last part of the game. Yes, it probably starts in the Industrial era but it doesn't particularly affect anything until the Information era at which point someone has probably already won. I'd rather see mechanics for...

Abraham Lincoln 20 Ashoka 21 Brennus 20 Canute 20 Charlemagne 20 Churchill 17 - Not a fan of Churchill - not that he wasn't a great leader during WW2 but he was also responsible for (or at least contributed to) a lot of problems before and during that get overlooked because he's over hyped. I...

Babylonians 24 Byzantines 8 Carthaginians 9 Dutch 4 Ethiopians 15 Hittites 16 - Didn't play Civ 3 so I missed out on a good opportunity to play a interesting (personally) ancient empire. Incas 31 Iroquois 14 Khmer 21 Koreans 15 Malians 23 Mayans 22 Mongols 28 Ottoman Turks 14 - Would like to...

Assyrians 8 Babylonians 28 Byzantines 14 Carthaginians 12 - I don't see them using Dido again which leaves Hannibal and warmongering (even the city-state is militaristic) even though gold, trade and the navy would be better focuses and naval combat is weak anyway. Dutch 11 Ethiopians 21 Hittites...

Ashanti 6 - New and deserving African civ. Phoenicians 4 Tibetans 3 - Came so close choosing Phoenicia but decided peaceable seafarers might make for some interesting abilities. Incas can rule the mountians.