Most of the countries under ottoman rule rebelled all the time during the occupation.
For the zulu thing, I said to a lesser extent for representation. They needed a few from Africa and a few from NA thats why Zulu and Native american empires were included.
You could say the same about other countries, yet no one constantly whines about their inclusion. Not that I hate poland or anything, but this game should be about civs that have made a global impact on civilization in some way and to a lesser extent to fill in gaps of representation on each...
Of course not. Unless they have conquered the region for several thousand years and fully assimilated it, they should not be a representative. They must have the unique culture, not just be land under control of a foreign power.
We might as well count poland as central europe
after all they are catholics and use the latin alphabet while most of eastern europe is orthodox and uses the cyrillic alphabet
they are a slavic people though
That is indeed what I am saying. This forum tends to turn into a nationalistic battlefield. :lol:
Anyway, you should read a book; a dictionary. Partisan traces its origin to154555 from latin origins.
Besides from what I've read they were simply an opposition group in WWII to fight...
Ya yugoslavia and about 40 other countries used the t-34. Idk about the other uu's, but to claim partisans as unique would be absurb. The iraqs fighting american forces in iraq are partisans. You can keep the marine guy I guess.
Edit: If you do claim the tank at least call it the Type A tank...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.