Realpolitik of the Smoky Skies - The Reboot

((If I could be considered to lead the scouts it would be an honor))

That would be possible, I don't think you need the government to approve you leading the Scouts but I certainly wouldn't object to it since we haven't made any specific orders on what to explore (except to find the city-state up north).

3) There are also two sub-classes, Adventurers and Officers:

*At any time, any player can choose to become an Adventurer and take command of a unit to explore. Discovering a new Civ, City-State, or Natural Wonder while leading the unit that made the discovery gives a small one-time boost to an Adventurer’s Funds and the opinion of all POPs in the Adventurer’s home city. This bonus carries over after the Adventurer returns to their original class. While on an expedition, the Adventurer cannot carry out any Actions and, if a member of the Legislature, cannot vote.

You would have to choose which Scout though, since there are two of them.
 
I support the motion as well.
 
I would like to lead the Northern Scouts in their mission to find the city state if possible. May we find glory and riches for Pulias in our trek North!
 
I thank you for your support my friends, if all goes well we will come back with great tales to tell.
 
I forgot to add a debate timer to the Orders Act, here it is.

Time left to debate Orders Act: Ended early due to fast-track motion.

3 Senators have approved a fast-track motion, and with me and Barnard as party leaders there is enough votes to go through with it, but I would like to see the approval of at least a majority of Senators before doing so since this is a very fundamental act for this term.
 
I support a fast track since the entire Senate has already debated these Orders behind closed doors and if any Senators had any public statements they wanted to make about them they've had ample time already.
 
Alright, and I agree. That means debate ends and voting begins on the Orders Act 1833.

Time left to vote: [TIMER="2015/08/30 22:30 UTC;Expired"][/TIMER]

I vote Aye.
 
I vote aye.
 
Today's edition of the Godwin Herald contained the following article:

Cultural Minister Abuses Station
by Gilbert Granville

It here follows:

Spoiler :
There are storm clouds around Senate House with accusations the Minister of Culture has abused his authority.

Senator the Honourable William Melda, second-term Senator for Haven of Peace, former Deputy Prime Minister, former President of the Pulias People's Party and current Minister of Science and Culture in the Second Gurra Ministry has been accused of using his ministerial authority to attain favourable treatment for his composer son in pushing for his work to be immortalised as the Pulian national anthem.

Sources from inside Senate House have confirmed that the minister attempted to convince Cabinet to adopt Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix, a composition by his own son, Charles Melda, to become the official national anthem of Pulias. Beyond abusing his authority in what appears to be a nepotistic manner, he is also accused to attempting to brand the Realm with iconography of his own political party, with the name of the anthem evoking the image of the official symbol of the Pulias People's Party: the Red Phoenix of Pulias.

How the Government and the Prime Minister will deal with the minister and this scandal is as yet unknown, however there is no indication she has reprimanded her minister for his apparent abuse of authority which if true would appear to make her complicit in this abuse of authority and process.

What was the selection process for this proposed national anthem? What are the credentials of its composer, other than being progeny of the Cultural Minister — surely not an equitable and fair qualification for anyone else to match. When were the Government going to tell us of this decision? And most importantly of all: why does the Government and the minister feel they and he can get away with pulling a stunt like this?

Senator Melda and Mister Melda have been contacted for comment.
 
Melda, why are you so hard on yourself? :lol:
 
The Zealot

The Case of the National Anthem

I have heard much fanfare over this supposed abuse of power by the new minister in regards to the new national anthem. How it saddens me that the our newspapers which used to tackle the burning issues of our day reduced to a haggard toothless old crone, sinking her teeth into soft stories, because she cannot handle the hard truth. What a pitiful sight indeed.
Now I know people will insist that it is the principle that counts, but that doesn't hold up for me. How does this directly affect us? The minister did not spend any public money promoting his son. He did not broadcast his music from the speakers meant for public announcements. He has merely proposed his son's work as a governmental symbol. This is no different from hiring an interior design decorator for the Senate halls.
Because here's the thing-no matter what song the government chooses, that won't automatically make it the national symbol. That is what the nation decides. We will collectively place value in something and make it a symbol. That is how symbols work. The government can try calling something a symbol and try promoting it, but unless we the people go along with it, it will remain a governmental symbol and not a national one.
I personally believe that no matter what song ends up being picked, it won't matter, because in my eyes, this nation already has a song. It is the sound of the workers slaving away in the factories, the sound of wedding bells signalling the beginning of two people sharing their lives together, the noisy pub where people go to relax and drown in sorrow, the sound of children laughing as they play, the silence as loved ones comfort each other, the sound of grief after a calamity has struck and on and on and on until all the sounds of humanity have been listed. It is not always a pretty song, nor is it always in tune, but it is a powerful song and a deeply moving one. But that is perhaps a bit difficult for marching bands to copy.
 
((Note: if you want to listen to the composition referred to in this article by the cultural reporter, the link to do so is here. Enjoy!))

Today's edition of the Godwin Herald contained the following article:

Favoured or Fraught?: the Phoenix Phenomenon
by Isaiah Meriwether

It here follows:

Spoiler :
Much paper has been inked furthering the views of the controversy surrounding Charles Melda's work, the proposed national anthem Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix. But I am not here to write about that; I think that has been covered more than enough elsewhere by people far more qualified to comment than I.

I am here to review the musical merits of the work as divorced from the political debate. I was fortunate enough that Mister Melda agreed to meet with me for an interview; given the circumstances I'm not sure I would be so eager to have any contact with the press if I were in his shoes at present.

For those who have not yet heard the piece, it begins with a brass fanfare which builds into a larger version of the fanfare with the entire military ensemble. Flute trills fly overhead and it is really quite excited. The piece then settles into a lightly understated iteration of what will soon become apparent as the main theme, interplayed between lightly duelling trombones and horns. Flutes and tinkling concert bells join in before the arrival of trumpets heralds the main thrust of the piece, at which point the entire military band joins in and the main theme is stated proudly and unmistakably. The lyrics of the proposed anthem can almost be heard even when listening to just the music without the accompanying singing. The piece then moves through various other stages, trying out new variations of the melodic lines and different orchestration arrangements within the ensemble. An understated but sprightly duet of the main theme between bassoon and clarinet leads back to the full ensemble with a restatement of the main theme as heard earlier. A decidedly playful sounding coda and an almost curt finale.

When I asked Mister Melda to sum up his thoughts about the tenor of the piece, he said it was "unashamedly triumphant and patriotic". I asked if he felt triumph and patriotism was missing from modern Pulias and he surprisingly disagreed. "No, I don't think that at all. But Pulias really has risen from the ashes like the proverbial phoenix of myth. It only seems fair that such a triumph of the people be matched by an equivalent musical work."

"The first minute of the piece isn't really it's strongest, is it?" I asked.

"No," he conceded. "I'll admit it does take a while to really get onto its feet. If it were ever adopted as anything official, like an anthem, I would perhaps suggest they the introductory sections out completely and get straight to the main section of the piece."

Missteps such as this will probably stop occurring as he matures and grows into an experienced composer.

When I had first learned Mister Melda was working on a piece for military band I was expecting something different, something perhaps more militaristic, which seemed to amuse him. "I don't think I have a militant bone in my body. My father might have an explosive temper at times but he's definitely not a violent man and he would probably disown me if I were!" He laughed but I couldn't tell if he was joking or not.

I asked him about some of the instrumentation choices, particularly a new instrument with which I wasn't previously familiar. "Yes, the instrument you're referring to is the saxophone. It's very new and isn't very widely distributed yet. Pulias is one of the only countries in the world that has one." Its timbre is strange, almost like a squeezed bassoon or clarinet. I asked him about it. "Yes, it does have a more . . . sonically pungent timbre. It's definitely hard to miss. It looks like a brass instrument but it's not, it's actually a woodwind instrument."

He explained that he was expecting the instrumentation choice, namely that of the saxophone to be controversial in some circles. "I didn't for the life of me imagine the whole piece would become infamous with controversy." He looked wistful at this, like he was trying to find humour in the situation but coming up short. That this paper had led the charge in the controversy was a point we politely ignored during our interview.

I decided to avoid delving further into the political aspect of the piece, and asked about his plans for the future: the experience hadn't caused him to abandon his career prospects in music, had it? "No," he assured me. "In fact, it's given me ideas for new works." He refused to give any further details, though, only saying that his experiences in life often fed into the music he produced.

If the twenty-five year old composer were to turn the maelstrom of politics surrounding his proposed anthem into a sonic form, I shudder to think of what dissonance it would surely yield!

So my verdict: divorced from the political entanglements I think Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix is a perfectly serviceable piece for military band. I don't yet feel we've reached a mature phase in his works, but this is definitely the most harmonically and orchestrationally complex work he's produced to date. If he can create works for such large ensembles at so young an age I look forward to seeing what he can do with ever larger ensembles! If you get a chance to hear this work I recommend you do so. And I suggest you forget about the political quagmire with which it is involved, and simply enjoy it on its musical merits, which are many, especially if you can make it through an admittedly last-lustre introductory minute.




Portrait of Charles Melda, composer (1830)
 
Today's edition of the Godwin Herald also contained the following article:

Mixed Reactions to Minister's Lapse of Judgement
by Gilbert Granville

It here follows:

Spoiler :
In a surprising development, public criticism has been muted for Senator the Honourable William Melda, the embattled minister at the heart of the first real political scandal of the Gurra government. It is no surprise that his friends and colleagues have defended him, arguing that his actions were a misjudgement at worst, not worthy of censure, however even political rivals outside of the Senate have been reluctant to criticise him too strongly.

Here is a selection of quotes from persons who wrote into the Herald regarding this matter:


"I'm sure he did it with a good intention, but once you're in the government, there are a few things that should not happen. And that is one of them. If it was the appropriate composition, I'm sure someone else would've proposed it."

--- Albert Bazil, retired Senator and until recently veteran member of the recently renamed Pulian Imperial Party


"Melda likely had the best intentions, but was, involuntarily predisposed to his son's music. I don't personally blame him, I merely wish he would be more careful in the future."

--- Senator the Honourable David Richterson, independent Senator for Coventry and Minister of Intelligence in the Gurra government


"I and the Democrat Socialists believe that if his son is able and his music satisfies the people, it is no shame to adopt his music as the national anthem. We judge people according to skills, not family background and we certainly do not object to giving honors to sons of Ministers if they deserve it."

--- Adam Smith, founder and leader of the Movement of Democratic Socialists


"There is currently no official selection or consideration going on, or planned to be undertaken anytime soon. Melda merely showed off the work of his son, like any proud father, whilst stating that perhaps we should look into finding a national anthem for Pulias. We didn't take the time to look into it any deeper and the matter was put aside by the Cabinet a few days ago as we found it more important to focus on the Orders Act 1833 and other senatorial business."

--- Senator the Honourable Aurora Gurra, Prime Minister of Pulias and President of the Pulias People's Party


"While I can see the issue is a seeming conflict of interest I think that Charles Melda is an excellent composer and that his song is an excellent candidate for an anthem. Should a man ignore the talents of others just because they have a familial connection?"

--- Henry Absoluti, leader of the Dawn Party


Clearly what this demonstrates is that most people do not seem to consider the minister's indiscretion to be a serious matter.

And that raises all sorts of questions: if the people who lead us cannot see the issues surrounding even a perceived conflict of interest in a minister of the crown putting his own son's work forward for governmental consideration with no formal selection process, then how are we to trust that they can lead us securely into the future without engaging in more damaging scandals that could have more serious consequences?
 
Okay, so I've gone through and updated the in-universe constitution (since there was one minor and one major alteration) as well as the legislative list.
 
A Bulletin from His Imperial Majesty, Emperor Franz of Pulias

I have been following with no small interest the recent scandal emerging within our esteemed legislature, and I am disappointed that a member of the cabinet, ostensibly sworn to serve all citizens of Pulias, would take advantage of his position to benefit his own family. Surely the Hon. William Melda must have been aware that he was conducting a blatant act of nepotism when he proposed that his own son's composition be adopted as the national anthem for our glorious nation, and thusly he should be reprimanded and Charles Melda's piece rejected. In its stead, I propose, and will support as much as my limited executive power permits, that we instead adopt as the Pulian National Anthem a musical composition written for my own family. Penned in the dark days of the Fall, surely it would serve as a much more inspirational piece for our glorious nation?

OOC: I was expecting more outrage over this :p. Perhaps this questionable act by the Emperor might stir something up...?
 
Yeah, I was expecting more rancour from opposition parties outside of the Senate, to be honest. ;)

Also, I just realised the Government has experienced an embarrassing defeat in the Senate: in accordance with the Senate Voting Act 1822 a quorum of four votes must be cast. Only three were. The Orders Act 1833 therefore fails to pass the Senate.

I propose that the bill be commended again to the chamber, and that it be fast-tracked once again. I also vote aye for its passage!
 
Top Bottom