Grow up, you got caught in false definition now your crying like a girl if you don't want to back up your arguments don't but you've done nothing but insult me since page 2 and you still haven't proven that your definition is acceptable?
Logical fallacy.
1. A dictionary is not necessarily correct
2. Throwing insults at me is not very intellectual, mr. Intellectually McIntellectual
3. I've already explained why criterion 7 is bunk, but you are either unwilling or incapable of understanding and accepting that.
Sidhe said:
So come on what is the definition of intelectual- I thank you, now go away and bother someone else, or make a decent argument, because if I'm average and this is the sum of your worth then you not even on the scale.
Several fallacies in that little snippet.
1. I've already given you a definitiib and explained why your criterion 7 that you cherish is false.
2. Insulting me does not, oh brilliant intellectual, mean anything.
Sidhe said:
And I want a detailed explanation as to why everything above is a logical fallacy?
First prove to me that you actually want said explanation.
Sidhe said:
But first I want you to admit you were wrong, the defenition of intelectual according to everyone except fifty is not what we're talking about, either concede the point or stop putting up fascile crap and spamming up the thread please.
1. just because you dont understand an argument does not make it wrong.
2. I've already explained why criterion 7 is crap.
3. Later on in THIS VERY POST I'M REPLYING TO you deride me for going with the popular judgement, and now you are screaming at me that your definition is the most popular. :crazyeyes:
Sidhe said:
And don't start spouting your usual drivel and basically flaming me, let's stick to the argument why is your definition only used by you and no one else a valid definition?
Because it avoids the problems with criterion 7 that I've already outlined.
Sidhe said:
Answer this and only this, if not don't open your mouth again and remove all doubt.
I'm puzzled by this accusation. Are you actually yelling at your computer screen? Because as for me, I just type, I don't actually open my mouth.
Sidhe said:
Also wrong another non sequitor. And you haven't porven that I don't, only that I can't spell so wrong.
Bolding and underlining by me, this literally made me laugh outloud
Sidhe said:
You two need to get a room
I'm an exhibitionist.
Sidhe said:
Another error based on faulty definition. Non sequitor
I've already explained why your criterion is wrong. So why dont you stop standing by your dictionary and we can actually discuss the issue instead of just you randomly spouting various near-incoherent accusations about every little thing.
Sidhe said:
Funny, because that's exactly your entire point about your stupid criterion 7.
Sidhe said:
Really i'm an exhibitionist.
Sidhe said:
Also based on an erroneous definition, clarifying that you have no idea what the word means and thus have been comitting a logical fallacy ever since your first post.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_definition
Wrong! The heart of the debate is about the definition of an intellectual so to accuse my argument of being incorrect because of a false definition is begging the question.