Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION V > Civ5 - General Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 18, 2011, 01:13 PM   #1
Palaiologos2
Prince
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Thessalonique
Posts: 346
Thoughts about Ottomans and the new patch.

Since the new patch makes changes to the civilization's unique abilities as well, i thought i'd share my thoughts about the Ottomans. Despite the fact that i am a Greek national, and i am supposed to be biased against them, i am not.
However the Ottomans/Turks never were, are not and as it seems never will be a maritime nation. Its not in their genes i suppose. Therefore giving them a maritime bonus seems tottally out of context. And quite frankly in gameplay terms their bonus is lame.
Now it would be much more appropiate to give them instead a "Ottoman tolerance" ability, i.e a couple of happiness points more in occupied foreign cities. Historically the Ottomans(not their Turkish descedants) were one of the more tolerant empires in the history of the Balkans. Seeing the new nerfs the new patch brings to happiness buildings, i think their tolerance ability would actually make an impact.

The other thing they were generally known for was their highly efficient diplomatic corps, inherited from the Byzantine Greeks. But i don't know how that could be effectively implemented in game.

Since i ussually dwell on the civ2 fora, i really don't know if this has been brought up before.
Palaiologos2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 02:36 PM   #2
BobDole
American Leader in Civ VI
 
BobDole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 783
It's a game; having a naval-based UA adds variety. Is there a lot of historical context for it? Maybe, I'd assume they got it from somewhere, but anyway, as long as it's fun and useful (still questionable if it is, but at least it looks slightly appealing now), that's what matters to most people.

And hey, it makes more sense than Giant Death Robots (although I'm glad there's finally a future unit in the game personally).
BobDole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 03:48 PM   #3
Louis XXIV
Le Roi Soleil
 
Louis XXIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 11,842
Actually, they had a pretty good navy in the Mediterranean. Plus, they did also promote piracy from their sort of clients on the African coast. Was it their focus? Of course not, but the Janissaries and Spiahi help represent them as a land power. There's a certain lack of synergy that is unfortunate, though. Still, on Continents, collect a lot of Galleys and use the navy to support your very powerful land army.
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy
-Ben Franklin
Louis XXIV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 07:08 PM   #4
Thry
Warlord
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 217
It's a game, we don't care if the UA matches what they did in real-life or not.

It's the same fricking reason why you can get Infantry before Riflemen.
Thry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 08:11 PM   #5
Save_Ferris
Admiring Myself
 
Save_Ferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Straight Outa Ponyville
Posts: 3,053
Ever heard of the battle of Lepanto? They lost, but still...
__________________
Can you survive the deadly mountain?

Save_Ferris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 09:39 PM   #6
OrsonM
Our man
 
OrsonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 533
I love playing with Ottomans, they really shine at exploring the world on Continents, Earth and Archipelago.

At the end of exploration, sadly, you were left with around 10-12 ships, which had to be disbanded because the upkeep was too much. Happy to see now you can keep a few of them.
OrsonM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 18, 2011, 10:49 PM   #7
Morningcalm
Emperor
 
Morningcalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,207
Have you guys ever heard of Khair ad-Din Barbarossa? Great pirate who became an admiral of the Ottoman navy, and it is his success whom the "Barbary Corsairs" trait is based on. It's a fitting trait, though I'd argue Spain or England would have been a better choice for a naval UA of some sort.
__________________
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
-Albert Einstein


Currently Reading Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson
Morningcalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2011, 01:32 AM   #8
McRoos
Warlord
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Uithoorn Netherlands
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Save_Ferris View Post
Ever heard of the battle of Lepanto? They lost, but still...
Also; did you hear about the Malta Siege in 1565.

The Ottoman Empire invaded the island, then held by the Knights Hospitaller (also known as the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, Knights of Malta, Knights of Rhodes, and Chevaliers of Malta)

The Knights won the siege, one of the bloodiest and most fiercely contested in history and one which became one of the most celebrated events in sixteenth century Europe.
The siege was the climax of an escalating contest between a Christian alliance and the Ottoman Empire for control of the Mediterranean, a contest that included Turkish corsair Turgut Reis's attack on Malta in 1551, and the Turks' utter destruction of an allied Christian fleet at the Battle of Djerba in 1560.
----

Who said they couldn' sail the winds ?

Then again, if any nation should be seen as a maritime nation, it should be the Dutch. The Dutch East India Company (Dutch: Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie, VOC) was a chartered company established in 1602, when the States-General of the Netherlands granted it a 21-year monopoly to carry out colonial activities in Asia. It was the first multinational corporation in the world and the first company to issue stock. It was also arguably the world's first megacorporation, possessing quasi-governmental powers, including the ability to wage war, imprison and execute convicts, negotiate treaties, coin money, and establish colonies.

No that's what you call maritime and so, when do we welcome them !!
McRoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2011, 03:32 AM   #9
marioflag
History Addict
 
marioflag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Napoli, Italy
Posts: 1,868
One thing i don't yet understand is if the changes applied to Ottomans and Germans are cumulative with their previous UA, or they just replace their previous bonuses?
In the latter case denomination of their UA should be changed accordingly.
marioflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2011, 04:20 AM   #10
Palaiologos2
Prince
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Thessalonique
Posts: 346
As for the Lepanto and Malta arguments i'm sorry but quite frankly are naive. You can find excellent naval commanders and operations in all the nations around the world. That doesn't make their nations "maritime"or "navy oriented".
And of course it is a game and there has to be a variety in the civs abilities. But is a game that very abstractly represents the historical evolution of man. If the developers wanted a couple of maritime civs to balance things up, they might as well have given the traits to the proper civs.

And as a sidenote being a maritime nation means they actually pioneered the field like the Greeks, Phoenicians, Spaniards and Portugeese. And the Brits and Dutch. Not just having a famous pirate who made a name of himself by raiding.
Palaiologos2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2011, 09:22 AM   #11
He-Who-Hunts
2nd Legionary Cohort
 
He-Who-Hunts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 253
I usually play England now but I think i will def be playing as sule after the patch.

You see I generally play a smaller empire game (because I'm on the road these days and am forced to use a lappy - do not have access to my comp back home), and as England I typically build up a small navy (around 4) and I promote the hell out of them.

Its not uncommon to have my fleet all have ranges and Logistics, and let me tell you a group of Ship-of-the-Line's or destroyers with extra range and an extra attack per turn can be quite powerful.

In fact with all my cities on the coast (usually 1 to 3, sometimes 4) its really all the defense I need, perhaps save a ground unit in each city to clean up any left overs. I cant imagine what it'll be like to have 67% off all my ships and have a crap load more due to turning barbs!

PLUS the Janissary is going to be a beast, the patch will nerf Longswords... which is a buff to Muskets.

Very excited to see my Barbary Corsairs!
__________________
“May you love like you've never been hurt, dance like no one is watching, sing as if no one were listening, screw like it's being filmed, and drink like a true Irishman”
He-Who-Hunts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION V > Civ5 - General Discussions > Thoughts about Ottomans and the new patch.

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR