| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
HOLY DOOLEY!
|
Is Empire now in a playable state?
I think that Empire has possibly the most interesting time period of any Total War games. Everyone loves the Romans and Medieval crusades but these are done to death in a variety of other games, books and films. As a game, Empire and its setting are quite unique. As such, I think it would be worth it to give another "try" to the game now the dust has settled, two years after its original disastrous release. With patches and mods, is the game fun? Is it worth installing and playing over Napoleon and Empire? Or is Napoleon: Total War superior in every aspect if you want a musket-era war?
Listing of good mods, that could improve aesthetics, gameplay, immersion, whatever it may be, would be much appreciated and help me as well as others try and give this game another go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fluffy
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 9,936
|
I didn't enjoy Empire that much, both on release and after giving it a try a year later. I rather enjoyed Napoleon though - I didn't play it that much, but it "felt" better.
__________________
A Madman with a Box
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
the green Napoleon
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 17,195
|
It was perfectly playable in 2010. It might not be as amazing as Shogun 2 or the non-gunpowder TWs but it is still the best RTS(hybrid) game of that era.
__________________
(I am) Fresh Prince of Buckingham | Game Sales & Bargains Thread Insults are the last refuge of the out-argued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
the green Napoleon
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 17,195
|
Yeah key word is "was", when it came out, in 2009 . Not after some point in 2010 once they had patched it up and several mods were out.
__________________
(I am) Fresh Prince of Buckingham | Game Sales & Bargains Thread Insults are the last refuge of the out-argued.
Last edited by Maniacal; Jan 12, 2012 at 01:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Formerly known as low
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 1,210
|
I've only put about a dozen or so hours into it (just got it recently) but I'm enjoying it without mods. Of course I can't compare it with it's previous state, but it's been far from boring...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Proud Kentuckian
|
I can Agree, it couldn't compare to Medieval, but it was certainly playable.
__________________
"The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid 'dens of crime' . . . but in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice." - C.S. Lewis, from The Screwtape Letters |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Dangerously Genre Savvy
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, California, US
Posts: 7,990
|
Assuming you're talking about M2 and not M1, I still don't quite understand why everyone showers M2 with so much praise. I honestly didn't find it to be a very good game; in fact to me it didn't really seem like anything more than a step back from RTW (and a big one with the release of the expansion). My opinion will certainly change when (if) EB2 ever gets released, but M2 was just...boring (RTW vanilla to a large extent was too). M1 in my mind was this series' peak, although I haven't yet played S2.
__________________
[21:25] <+Anonymoose> You sure are. Like a cool cat. Cooler, perhaps. I shouldn't get hasty about it, but I'm pretty comfortable in saying that you're as cool as a cool cat, with a standard deviation of .3 cool points. My mission to see 1081 great movies before I die - Last Updated 11/29/12 - #43 Pinocchio (1940) New url! http://1081movies.blogspot.com (old reviews) http://1081beforeyoudie.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Brit Patriot
Join Date: May 2007
Location: RAF Biggin Hill.
Posts: 1,489
|
I'm going to be Mr. Unpopular Opinion here and say that, yes it's playable, and well worth playing. Have to admit, I enjoyed it more then M2.
Then again, that's just me.
__________________
For Britain and the AAR's watched: The Sound of Drums HOII AAR: Medal of Dedication, “‘Postponed-due-to-leaves-in-the-air’ Battle of Britain” Award |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Vampire Slayer Slayer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Standing next to Waldo
Posts: 425
|
I like Empire a lot. the only problem with gameplay is that the Netherlands is hard to play as effectively. A pirate ship sails into the indies quickly and kills your trade fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
your ad here
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blue Jay Way
Posts: 2,660
|
I got it in a bundle when I bought Medieval 2 a few years ago. I've never bothered with the campaign map and only play the custom battles. That part of the game is still quite buggy, in my opinion. My biggest pet peeve is the AI really likes to begin it's battles by having it's general charge into your ranks head on. Incredibly stupid stuff like that. In fact it often does that with most of it's troops - ignores their guns, and just charges in for a melee. It sucks a lot of fun out of it.
That said, the graphics are quite nice (repetitive faces aside) and I had quite a bit of fun at first just marching my men around in lines and firing off cannons.
__________________
..I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 4,227
|
I play darth mod and the Empire AI in battles is still horrible. Usually they charge in with their horse too hastily, and leave their flanks hanging in the air. So you simply use your horse to attack the flanks and rear of their army, while your infantry and cannon destory their center. Its the same old thing for the most part from battle to battle.
The other issue are sieges, once you get howitzers you can simply stand off and destroy all enemy troops inside the walls with limeshot and explosive shells. Its long and boring. The thing that would make it better is to play with limited ammo for your artillery. I have not tried that, but the game would be better, becuse you would have to use your manpower to take forts. This makes your campaign more difficult, which makes the game more challenging. All in all though the AI in this game needs a rework. They should apply the Fall of the Samurai AI to all other Total war games. The AI in these games has evolved quite nicely. The current AI in FoTS has been very challenging.
__________________
"All science trembles at the searing logic of your fiery intellect. " Brig. Gen. Lewis A. Armistead |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
the green Napoleon
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 17,195
|
Honestly DarthMod AI hasn't impressed me since RTW. If anything I felt it was worse in NTW :/
__________________
(I am) Fresh Prince of Buckingham | Game Sales & Bargains Thread Insults are the last refuge of the out-argued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 2,153
|
I still only like one Total War game series, and that was Rome Total War done by the original Creative Assembly crew and launched by Activision, i think the coming of Sega screwed everything and the game lost its magic and playability.
I´m awaiting for Rome Total War 2, but if the graphics and gameplay are like Medieval II, Napolean and Shogun, i will be very disappointed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 4,227
|
Quote:
__________________
"All science trembles at the searing logic of your fiery intellect. " Brig. Gen. Lewis A. Armistead Last edited by nokmirt; Apr 05, 2012 at 07:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Vampire Slayer Slayer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Standing next to Waldo
Posts: 425
|
Just went through another game in Empire. It is comparable to Napoleon, but I think battles are more fun in Empire. With a walled city, you can withstand even a large army sieging you
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
The Red Carnot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O'Connell Street
Posts: 22,376
|
Quote:
__________________
"The great only appear great because we are on our knees: Let us rise!" - Big Jim Larkin
"Philosophy was for them more important than opportunism, and so they achieved in the end philosophy rather than opportunity." - Thurmon Arnold (-8.75,-5.15) Ask a Red IV The Revolution Will Not Be Televised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Chieftain
|
I play with darthmod, and I quite like the game. The campaign AI still isnt the greatest but quite good. The AI occasionally take each other out!
I would have to agree that fort battles are extremely difficult to control and I prefer not to defend from a fort, I just start with all my guys outside except a general to 'hold the square' but otherwise an enjoyable game. Im still no good with naval battles though when the odds are against me. I can win with even or good odds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Vampire Slayer Slayer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Standing next to Waldo
Posts: 425
|
Fort battles are really easy, once you get the hang of them. maybe not as easy as in RTW or medieval, but I have beaten large armies with only armed mobs. Invading is even easier, as rushing some dragoons to the other side as your main infantry charge the front. Once you climb up the walls, you have a whole lot of melee combat, and then finally the outcome is decided. Grenadiers are helpful if you blow a whole in the enemy wall, or if you are trying to defend a hole yourself.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|